Yesterday Feb 13th here northern UK a bright blue sky earlier in the morning (uh-uh …. a likely chem trail day?) …. I never got time to see the sky from a more open aspect until late afternoon, hey presto parallel tracks in the sky of much faded aircraft trails depositing something un-natural. The usual hazy non-natural effect dulling what should have been a brighter afternoon. This really annoys me and its not easy to find definite explanations, like the clouds themselves the answers are mostly ‘hazy’.
California burned in a most un-natural way last summer and they have suffered chem trail deposition I assume for decades. And yet its still an intense drought. So where is the logic, where is the integrity of the so-called explanations that we are being expected to ‘swallow’. I’m assuming aluminium nano-particles have drifted to earth and aided the incendiary effect. Likewise its thought childhood autism my stem from these metals. Note I preface with ‘I assume’ or ‘in my opinion’ … I do not offer up data as truth when its merely my own conjecture or merely a ‘could be’. but as can be seen by anyone that reads these notes I do have a brain; increasingly rare in this age of successive tv generations.
The so-called explanations as to why these chem trails are allowed or their function do not ‘stack up’.
I’m a trifle tired of broaching ‘climate change’ to what I assume are reasonably intelligent and switched on ppl and getting pushed back as alarmist or the dreaded term ‘conspiracy theory’, not far short of my hatred of the use of ‘cool’. Perhaps I don’t circulate among the right people, theres too much fantasy in the world now, too much disconnect from reality, as to how we make a living; an absurd desire for a degree, often a degree of ‘nothing’ . Unfortunately we live in ‘interesting times’. As Orwell predicted mass media manipulation has exploded and all thanks to online, spin so extreme as to be outright lies, slogans and vague feel-good homilies (MAGA) that bear no relation ship to the outright wrecking from trump. Just as with Orwells ‘1984’ we are so easily tracked and profiled. I’ve known some ppl object to ID cards, I’m fine with the idea, its with our electronic connectivity thats the real danger. The latest absurd ‘must have’ electric smart meters are to my mind quite obscene and the ultimate BS.
So, how do farmers, raisers of livestock, growers of crops and fruit and insects themselves (ie the remaining 25% from forty years ago) view a future of engineered and therefore dull days? If we’ve lost that many insects and pollinators then the outlook is either none or dominant species; likewise the loss of diatoms and plankton, essential for CO2>O conversion and the production of DMS a gas that is tied in with natures way of cloud formation.
Sea level rise is a ‘given’, anyone now in SFO, NY, London, Shanghai must have an increasing nagging doubt as to how things will look in ten years. The arctic has lost its sea ice but its Greenland and the Antarctic that will give us the ‘bulk’ in rising sea levels. The IPCC that brings together the nations of the world is so out of step, so lagging behind the curve as to be as much a hindrance as a benefit. On youtube we find the IPCC predicts summer sea ice in the arctic will disappear by 2080 – its gone NOW !!! Likewise IPCC predictions scheduled for 2050 – 2100 are happening right now. Look at the Prof Peter Wadhams vid in my prev post ie page 2. Heres a link …. IPCC predictions are dangerously slow.
The point of this blog and the time I expend is that I believe my reading of the available material ‘my viewpoint’ is the right one and I use my words to counter what I think is misinformation. For instance ice melt at the Poles, the links and vids prove that rivers running where it should be all silent and frozen and glaciers melting at alarming rates are the evidence for our own eyes, not some blinkered denial from ppl that perhaps cannot even read a book. In other words are of very limited ability in processing and assimilating information. If a person hasn’t got the hunger to have books then I seriously doubt they are qualified to argue with me. Its commonplace to go to a house and theres not a book in sight, no papers, no pens, no note-taking, no retention of anything, perhaps no thoughts of any value. I just could not live in such a barren and passive environment!
Postscript 17th May 2018. Regarding media manipulation. Maybe half a dozen times to different people I’ve pointed upwards to the sky not really getting anywhere and today it was a revelation.
“Oh you don’t believe in that mind control” ….
Uh??
“Of course not but what I am saying is that those straight lines that haze and merge are not conventional aircraft trails, they’re full of aluminium and organic growers are having problems with it, its also why California burned the way it did.”
(Remember …. Monsantos GM patents include aluminium resistance).
So who the heck is talking abt mind control? As with the first two people I mentioned this to and avid Fox News fans, as I did determine from that encounter there is concious effort to broadcast material that ridicules the ‘look at the chemtrail activists’. That indeed is nasty and explains why its so difficult to get ppl to look up and take notice. Thats why its so difficult, they have been set against any such enquiry by it being framed in the media as a crackpot notion. Framed to automatically be seen as a nutcase enthusiasm. You see, theres no tv in this house so how wld I know their prior knowledge is so affected, so conditioned to ridicule my concern?
climate-change-briefing 