Chemtrails … or not?

Tricky subject this, highly emotive.

I personally don’t know which way to go on this, I’m trained to be analytical, to think  (my work which can be often original and of a high level amply demonstrates such) to operate a certain rigour and look further than the merely apparent, however lets try to calmly evaluate what we see.

Yesterday morning Thursday 9th March 2018 say 0800-1000 what had originally been a bright blue sky was chopped up and obscured with fast evolving haze that at present I view as chemical/ particle additives or chemtrails, part of the admitted ‘geoengineering’ activity that the Government admits to. So therefore deniers are already in the wrong ‘cos the UK Government admits to it. I only turned on to this whole subject a few weeks ago, but cannot help wonder why our bright blue mornings and days are ruined by non-disappearing aircraft trails that meld to a continuous sky of haze, a huge hotch-potch of non-conformity. I pointed this out yesterday morning at nine to a neighbour and its like banging ones head against a brick wall, nothing but refusal to read the picture and an immediate use of the dreaded lazy cover-all ‘controversy theory’ to patronise to piss-take, as if teflon coated to refute anything and everything. But another nearby resident was open to the idea that things were not quite right overhead and I can see I set her mind to think on the problem.

We had three days of this before the week of snow recently, observed 22-24th Feb 2018.

The day before yesterday ie 8th March there was none of this hazy contrived sky-scape, just a bright blue sky with the what was usual minimal aircraft activity. But watch out for mornings of high pressure ie a bright blue sky, I know fine well succeeding clear blue mornings would be more likely to produce the phenomena. As with all early sciences and laymans observations we need to develop a formalised reporting card or evaluation, otherwise the observed data itself merely becomes hazy!

My question is,  why is it on ‘chemtrail days’ we see aircraft flying repeatedly where aircraft to my mind normally never run?  Why do the trails persist, whats the high pressure to chemtrail connection? Why the extreme turbulence and rapid change in appearance continually morphing over the two hours I observed yesterday? Why are people not prompted to engage brain cells when what we see above is so contrived, so unreal?  … how I detest the term ‘controversy theory’ a sound-clever lazy catch-all.

The parallel spaced trails may occur because of repeated runs of trail that drift therefore spacing them apart. But so far with early observations the spaced trails often remain where they are planted and looks that the aircraft themselves are spaced sideways, though I do realise the sky above can be highly stratified re wind direction, speed etc.  However, the drift is always at right angles to the flightpath, is this engineered, intentional or is it after all the fingerprint in the sky of repeated journeys? California has had many years of this aerial activity and its thought the aluminium caused the catastrophic incendiary type of effect in recent fires, the second embed below has a parade of intelligent scientific, medical and technical people that all question and condem this activity as certainly to be chem trails and the associated much higher levels of aluminium nano particles that it is believed cause Alzheimers and autism, ie instead of autism in children ocurring at say one in ten thousand its now one in forty eight for boys.  We can also see on ‘busy days’ several aircraft in the sky at once, we are a backwater here, its hard to see why or justify such intense aerial activity.

What also bugged me about yesterday mornings apparent chemtrail activity when the previous day there was nothing was the turbulence and fast evolving haze/ ‘cloud’ system that constantly churned and evolved at a peculier high rate of knots, not at all a ‘steady state’. These were not high altitude Cumulus, merely strands of haze. Every five minutes looking out the door the spectacle had changed. It would have been interesting to capture this on stop-motion photography, maybe I will. I would also hazard that lets say it was a chemical deposition, to my mind it looked to have descended quickly to lower altitude, if we are correct in connecting flight activity with being a man-made and artoficail obscured sky. Thres lots of conjecture here but what we are observing cannot help but prompt questions.

We know that with the present levels of CO2 that plant protein is a third down, transpiration and planetary cooling and CO2 conversion reduced, also plankton loss, ice loss, Jet Stream circumpolar circulation now split and flowing as two loops over the Arctic, arctic temp up a staggering 30C (not a misprint) impending Antarctic ice shelf collapse due to sea undercutting, Arctic methane release in three forms …. etc etc …. and so I realise everything is changing extremely rapidly, much quicker than anyone would have dared to predict and so maybe the atmospheric reaction to air traffic is a natural cause of needless haze and manufactured skies … but I think not. Chem trails are admitted as a multi-million industry, lots of vested interested. But the reasons DO NOT STACK UP.

Incidentally, the whole odea of such chemtrail and weather manipulation activity originated from the Military, to control the weather in the battlefield and cause disaster in your enemies homeland.

Its up to you to find what you wish on this emotive subject; some are hell bent on denying what I write about when its obvious there is some validity. All I wish in this post is to open readers minds and get what I see above into the open for discussion.

In balance here Paul Beckwith tells us chemtrails are phoney  …




Incidentally proving the Government is not squeeky clean  ….

Note on the above link the trail goes dead.

postscript …  Sunday 11th March 2018. At 0700 its v obvious to see chemtrails above our local city in a clear blue sky, twenty minutes later hazed over, would be hard to convince anyone unless having seen the earlier observation; three planes in the sky and two 90 degree turns added to the oddness of the first observation. Its the speed at which the sky/ haze develops that raises questions and churns and develops every few minutes also planes on flightpaths we would never normally see. Yesterday was drizzle then fog, previous day my irritating encounter with a neighbour at 0900 trying to get them to realise something is wrong – not to introduce whacky conspiracy crap but merely to engage some brain cells instead of offering ridicule. Many people just do not ‘see it’.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s