These things bug me.
A lot of my lifetimes work (unrelated to chemtrails) has been to develop insight and intuition, to know the detail of whatever.
Lets look at the evidence fro chemtrails as I see it …
- some days no trails at all which of course makes it even more obvious.
- some days more flights than ever and bingo its a chemtrail day!
- why in the afternoon do we get a vigorous reaction to the mornings chemtrail activity ie heavy cloud on a HP day?
- chemtrails seem to appear when it looks set to be a bright clear blue sky ie a HP day, we seem to be denied a clear sky.
- chemtrails can be random pattern or can be a deliberate ‘corridor’ of man-made cloud / haze either at distance so as to drift overhead or laid directly above.
- these things don’t disappear but haze and spread (as intended) and fuzz up the sky.
- the giveaway is the resultant fast churn and unreal vista above. Five minute observations and the churn is obscene on a heavy chemtrail day.
- Aluminium levels are much increased (exacerbating Ca wildfires) ?
I can’t make it clearer than that. My view is that chemtrails are to increase the reflectivity of the atmosphere, to deflect sunlight. But surely the downside is a reduction in crop growth? If its merely to raise lets say aluminium levels in the atmosphere generally ie for reflectivity then why not just do it where humans cannot see it ie out at sea?
General media wrap up the chemtrail thing with other nonsense so-called ‘theories’ so as to make people like me look stupid.
Goog image search ‘lines in the sky’ and we get pics just like the ones I post here on this blog. https://www.alamy.com/search.html?qt=chemtrails&imgt=0
Also for instance …. http://scribol.com/anthropology-and-history/bizarre-and-offbeat-news/chemicals-or-vapor-trails-either-way-those-lines-in-the-sky-are-bad-news/
There doesn’t seem to be much at all of current up to date blogging or diary of this lines in the sky / chemtrail activity, most blogs I find fizzle out quite quickly. Until I started this climate change blog a year ago I must admit I don’t think I’d even heard of chemtrails.
interesting …. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/strangedays/strangedays03.htm
29th Jan 2019 postscript,
So heres a trick to circumvent google keeping us reined in to our own circular never escaping environment, confined geographically, limiting my outreach … google yr favourite subject and key in another location ( I mention this also in the post above) ie ‘chemtrail pics Vancouver’ or Seattle or San Diego or Holland or Sardinia, the Algarve, Anglesey, Cornwall, Bremen, Brittany etc etc and hey presto full strength bona-fide material appears to hand from other chemtrail photographers! An example … of gold to mine …. http://stopsprayingus.com/
Also … http://thegreaterpicture.com/chemtrails.html
postscript 30th Jan 2019 …. I quote … General media insist on bundling chemtrails up with unrelated ‘nonsense’ theories so as to ridicle ppl like me. Using NASA worldview with the free ‘corrected reflectance’ added for comparison (ie bottom of drop down menu) I see LOTS of chemtrail acivity over Rotterdam, Bremen, northern France, etc also Irish Sea, Algarve, Vancouver, San Diego etc etc. I have devised a DQA reporting system and keep a diary of each day – attempting to see rhytmn or pattern in this chemtrail activity. Its often a high pressure day when they spray, ruining the bright blue sky. I also find that google can tend to enclose or isolate us geographically therefore use a standard search term of ‘chemtrail pictures Seattle’ …. and add any of the locations mentioned above…. from this we can see what others are doing in monitoring this nonsense. unquote.