facebook chemtrails and an about face…

I should really search chemtrail facebook more often, near zilch to present yet heres much to confirm chemtrails are real and something to question and certainly take note of.

I’m not fighting anyone, nor creating a ‘war’ with any government, merely hoping to bring some sensible awareness that indeed chemtrails are real by bundling together my observations and useful material to strengthen my position.

In the material below we can see older (same day) hazed and aluminized sky, medium term broadening chemtrail into bands of haze and new ‘as being laid’ chemtrail.  I’ve photographed chemtrail here in NE England at night in the dark an hour or more before first light of day, which in that particular morning was so blatant I think would never have been perpetrated in daylight (pics pending).

https://www.facebook.com/Amsterdam-Chemtrails-

 

Scouting around we find many pages or sites that fizzle out over time. I also note how few visitors or followers this material actually gathers considering how ‘big’ or apparent in the sky above the problem actually is.

Rosalind Peterson appears and I know from prior knowledge was a peculiar case of a lifetime chemtrail acknowledgement and activism and latterly a complete about-turn and denial before she passed away in Feb 2018, assuming I’ve got my facts correct of course.

Heres bits and pieces to build a picture ….

Welcome to California Skywatch

 

 

Then the bombshell from Rosalind Peterson in later life, a complete ‘about-turn’, also I’ve pasted some transcript from this specific youtube page beneath the vid below. I wish no disrespect here, merely bringing in material to form a fuller more informed discussion.

I quote …

Rosalind Peterson, founder of California Skywatch, says there’s no evidence that those trails in the sky are anything other than normal contrails, aircraft emissions. Transcript of that portion:

“We have to stick with what we can prove. We have to stay away from opinions and beliefs. And if we go to sue someone, we have to have enough rock solid evidence that is so tight to make a case so that we don’t lose the case, and that we have many many people, in other words experts in various fields, to testify on our behalf. This mean university professors, this means people that can come and back up our statements, back up the studies, where we can prove that the jets for example reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the earth, they change the climate.
And so what happens is, that when I see though, that we are talking about suing, … who? In other words, I find that the direct proof to link up who’s doing what …, and also I can tell you that in ten years of research, other than aluminum coated fiberglass, chaff releases by the US Military, I have no proof whatsoever that the jets are releasing anything but jet fuel emissions.
Now I can prove that the rocket programs in the United States are releasing trimethylaluminum, aluminum oxide, barium. I can prove the rocket programs in the United States are just coating us with toxic chemicals all the time. And these programs are listed at NASA, NOAA, the US Air Force, the US Navy, I mean there’s tests going on all the time. The US Navy CARE program is a prime example. So I can prove, I have so many documents I couldn’t even put them all on the internet, even if I tried, because there’s Pentagon reports, there’s all kind of reports dating back twenty, thirty years.
When it comes to proving what the jets are releasing, I don’t have the documentation, and I don’t have a single study, I don’t have a single solitary verifiable evidence that the jets are releasing anything except military releases of aluminum coated fiberglass by military aircraft.
So there’s a differentiation for me in putting my name or associating myself with something where I can’t back it up. Now if anyone has direct proof, they’ve got university studies, if you’ve got documents, government documents, if you’ve got reports, then that makes a big difference. But right now, after ten years of research, I can’t do it.”

end of quote.

All she’ll talk about is probably what is known as ‘chaff’ ie something to confuse enemy radar, a v old technique.

Disclaimer, you have to realise material online may not quite be what it purports to be, there are bound to some ppl that delight in twisting and turning the facts to suit their own viewpoint, to possibly hijack a subject and in effect attempt to misinform and damage the facts as best presented. Therefore of course, read diligently, be sure to get at the intention of the text or material; wolves in sheeps clothing etc.

Currently USA scientists and environmental experts are held in the cleft stick of shut-up or lose your funding.

 

 

 

Yesterdays chemtrails.

Chemtrail diary.

To economise needless creation of data-bulk links for yesterday will suffice with one pic ‘the star pic’ to finish. I think we need to be mindful that data / web is multiplying to stupid proportions.

Chemtrail geoengineering clues as per NASA Worldview are revealed by colour, sometimes by the creation of corridors as well as random pattern and often visible hints given by the edges of systems and chemtrail geoengineering activity.

chemtrails Berwickshire and Northumberland, northern England … https://go.nasa.gov/2MebJu9

chemtrails southern Scotland, Isle of Man … https://go.nasa.gov/2MhqOLJ

chemtrails Volgograd, Kharkov …  https://go.nasa.gov/2BdbUzF

chemtrails Baltic Sea, Gdansk … https://go.nasa.gov/2oHJ8EE

chemtrails Gulf of St Lawrence … https://go.nasa.gov/35AYwDr

 

Rome, San Marino, Trieste, the Adriatic, chemtrail geoengineering 14th October 2019https://go.nasa.gov/2Bd939V
Rome, San Marino, Trieste, the Adriatic, chemtrail geoengineering 14th October 2019https://go.nasa.gov/2Bd939V

In the above a full 50% of apparent ‘cloud’ (ie white / grey stuff) is man made and deliberate chemtrail geoengineering. The down side is that chemtrail is a deliberate pollutant, aluminium barium and strontium we are informed being the major ingredients. Hence CA wildfires burnt as they did, hence bees are now suffering from dementia and life in lakes and rivers is much if not totally depleted in some areas of the world, no-one sees bugs or insects on the front of cars anymore. What more proof do we need things are going very wrong. The importance of the hit to microscopic life in water and oceans is not fully conveyed, as I’ve written before the irony of losing the base of the marine food chain ie diatoms looks to have led to the loss of the coral and the marine food chain itself. Ancient diatoms account for the creation of 70% of the worlds oil and gas deposits. In a sense we could say Man is eating itself.

Disclaimer, these are merely my own personal views to help open up discussion, raise awareness and somehow fight back the smothering mass-media influence that chemtrails are a joke. E&OE.

 

postscript: googling for ‘chemtrail pics UK I get good ranking, especially on image searches, a post for period Christmas 2018 and as an example specifically December 22 2018 has been augmented by my current use of NASA Worldview, ie the post for and its recently added content … https://climate-change-briefing.com/2018/12/23/chemtrails-uk-3/

you may also find useful  …

https://climate-change-briefing.com/2018/12/30/chemtrail-reporting-system/

https://climate-change-briefing.com/tag/chemtrails-uk/page/2/

From the 22nd Dec 2018 updated chemtrail post(to include my nowadays inclusion of NASA Worldview material) lets include here below ‘the star pic’ of a chemtrail frenzy, ie the middle of the three recently added.

Lisbon, Porto, Portugal chemtrails geoengineering 22 Dec 2018 https://go.nasa.gov/35ztmfs
Lisbon, Porto, Portugal chemtrails geoengineering 22 Dec 2018 https://go.nasa.gov/35ztmfs

 

 

 

 

Handed on a plate, strong proof of chemtrails UK.

At noon it was easy to see a wall of haze and chemtrail above our local city of Newcastle upon Tyne to the south of here. Four hours later looking at NASA Worldview and my already suspected idea that chemtrail is often added to an existing cloud system as an ‘outer band’  is today finally proven and to my mind without doubt.

All afternoon chemtrails have been added to the existing hazy mess, not high intensity but say at a guess ten an hour. The results we see on Worldview match what has been observed today. I was right, the colour, tone all point to chemtrail when observed on Worldview. Direct observation and Worldview results confirm one another.

across the UK a devious band of chemtrail as observed on the ground 11th Oct 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2IJfkyb
across the UK a devious band of chemtrail as observed on the ground 11th Oct 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2IJfkyb

 

Can I find chemtrails ?

Yes I can, lots of them. A few weeks ago here north east England an hour before sunrise looking up it was like a Regency wallpaper at all the BIG parallel lines in the sky. This would never have been done in daylight, it really would have been too obvious. And so as with yesterday Thursday 3rd October 2019 the morning chemtrail geoengineering was a subtle yet persistent affair but by mid morning was painfully obvious ramped up to a chemtrail free-for-all in that both obvious chemtrail lines in the sky and the randomness of compass heading / directions utilised was quite insulting and yet NO-ONE seems to be savvy enough to look up and wonder what is happening. Most folk know little or nothing about such things, ie no observational experience yet quite openly and immediately will refute the phenomena known as ‘chemtrails’. General media has indeed done a good job at ridiculing such things, remember that anything chemtrail is always bundled up with nonsense and a term I detest … ‘conspiracy theories’.

Most certainly the weathermen / meteorologists must be tied and bound with the Official Secrets Act.

What I need is accurate and archived weather sat images more detailed than the obscure fuzzy offerings of   http://www.sat24.com/gb  which is near to useless for my purposes.

Maybe I need this … https://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/articles/goes-s-next-generation-high-definition-weather-satellite-set-to-launch-forecasting-into-the-future/96497/

To recap, Thursday 3rd Oct 2019 saw obvious chemtrail activity here in NE England.

As the NASA Worldview sat image collected yesterday afternoon demonstrates as witnessed, there indeed was a visible edge to the grey blanket of morphed chemtrail aluminium visible as shown say twenty thirty miles out into the North Sea.

Europe and the UK suspected chemtrail Thursday 3 Oct 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2Ol8QJs
Europe and the UK suspected chemtrail Thursday 3 Oct 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2Ol8QJs

In my opinion and so far developed ‘eye’ to these things the outer right hand curving rim of the above weather system provides an excellent means of laying down chemtrail but what doesn’t follow through is how so much above yesterday was in random directions and also three big arcs of wide-hazing chemtrail. By lunchtime the sky had modified to a grey fug; therefore I would tend to say the above sat image is certainly data from after twelve noon.

Paris, Rheims, Luxembourg, chemtrail geoengineering 3 Oct 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2AGhWIO
Paris, Rheims, Luxembourg, chemtrail geoengineering 3 Oct 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2AGhWIO

In the above there is both visible recent chemtrail lines in the sky which are quite obvious and previous ie two or three hour resultant grey chemtrail fug / chemtrail aluminised haze. The links are clickable, the only drawback is that there is a limit to magnifiable definition.

Latest points to note of chemtrail activity 2019 are broken / intermittent chemtrail spraying and pre-dawn chemtrails.

As is my habit, lets look for chemtrail youtubes for Paris, Reims, Luxembourg.

Lines in the sky.

UK chemtrail diary Fri 13th Sept 2019.

Loads of crappy lines in the sky this morning, would have to be blind or stupid or both not to notice, but hey presto …. few take notice.

NASA Worldview luckily displayed lots of lines in the sky ie chemtrails yesterday at 14:40 basically as soon as the data was available for southern England, however six hours later the criss-cross lines in the sky as revealed by NASA Worldview for southern England had disappeared.  Luckily I took a screen shot of the chemtrails at first viewing ie 14:40 hrs.

Six hours later this chemtrail pic was replaced at NASA Worldview to one with far less number of chemtrails. England chemtrails Fri 13th 2019 1440 hrs
Six hours later this chemtrail pic was replaced at NASA Worldview to one with far less number of chemtrails. England chemtrails Fri 13th 2019 1440 hrs

 

Here below is what we find a day later when we view retrospectively chemtrail / lines in the sky for southern England Fri 13th Sept 2019 ie my chemtrail diary.

second version of southern England chemtrails published by NASA for 13th Sept 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/31ktrBi
second version ie altered to eliminate chemtrails of southern England lines in the sky as published by NASA for 13th Sept 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/31ktrBi

On the above elimination of the lines in the sky for southern England ie chemtrail data  note slight difference in area encompassed by the screenshot.

Same day further in northern England as was most certainly obvious early and mid morning we see an obvious ‘corridor’ of chemtrail material. Chemtrails in corridor fashion is one technique as is ‘on and off’ chemtrail spraying when making a more random / any direction chemtrail performance. Another trick often used in North America chemtrail spraying is to tag onto the outer limits of a cloud system as posted here a few days ago; link pending.

Below, is heavy chemtrail action across the Irish Sea, Anglesey, Lancashire and onto the North East as captured and still remaining accessible for Fri 13th 2019.

Irish Sea chemtrails, Anglesey, Lancashire, North East England Fri 13th Sept 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/2ZYt81B
Irish Sea chemtrails, Anglesey, Lancashire, North East England Fri 13th Sept 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/2ZYt81B

Note I am always keen to use the particular name of the day, to try and see some rythmn to the weekly routine of chemtrails.

Heres another for that Friday, Hudson bay ie https://go.nasa.gov/31kuEsk

As is my habit lets go look for some youtubes to accompany these locations …

As the first embed narrator tells us “Its the big elephant in the room nobody is talking about”. 

 

chemtrails Denmark.

My web has been down a week, yes chemtrails continue, yesterday 10 Sept in Newcastle upon Tyne yes chemtrails easily and obviously seen, yet who notices ??  Seldom I visit the trendier synthetic manufactured and no doubt grossly over grant-aided locations yet the comicality of two separate groovesters photographing the graffiti and ‘street-scene’ when in fact chemtrails blaze overhead is quite pathetic. Oh dear.

So today Denmark has some quite obvious chemtrails in the (only partially useful) NASA Worldview (it misses lots) … click onto the link and use the mag icon, theres lots.

Denmark chemtrails Sept 11 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/31gIsUW
Denmark chemtrails Sept 11 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/31gIsUW

 

As is my custom lets hunt around for youtube evidence of chemtrails in Denmark, below.

 

 

What we will never see from NASA Worldview re chemtrails.

Plain as day its not a uniform or ‘joined up’ image. We have lost what could be a lot of chemtrail data to the east ie the right of the screen. I’m posting early so as to see if it sorts itself out (is modified) as the day proceeds. screen capture below taken at 5pm BST ie local UK.

disparate data chemtrails geoengineering southern Ireland from Worldview 15 Aug 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/33B7I9I
disparate data chemtrails geoengineering southern Ireland from Worldview 15 Aug 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/33B7I9I

Below, Denmark, Copenhagen, Bornholm, Oland as is very often the case get lots of chemtrails.

Denmark, Copenhagen, Bornholm, Oland chemtrails geoengineering 15 August 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/33A6kEr
Denmark, Copenhagen, Bornholm, Oland chemtrails geoengineering 15 August 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/33A6kEr