Lines in the sky – today for instance.

Not much here northern UK in March but dribs n drabs, at lockdown a noticeable absence of chemtrail for days, but now these last few days its back to normal. ie today Tuesday 7 April 2020 chemtrail in the sky, as for three days now an aluminized sky which to my mind is obvious in its being so un-natural and now today its back to high alt long straight lines that do not fade away as conventional contrail should do so, mostly haze broader and add to the increasing haze in the sky. I photograph them but energy and time for this is decreasing. What is it that people don’t get? How many instances will it ever take?

So, firstly I can see say two or three lines in the sky per hour and now mid afternoon the NASA Worldview images are available and voila heres what we see ….. ie chemtrails.

Borders and southern Scotland, northern England chemtrail skies Tuesday 7 April 2020. https://go.nasa.gov/2UQQbs0

Everything over sea in the above is chemtrail, the colour is an instant give-away. Click on the link and expand to see some detail. NASA Worldview is only good for say a third of what happens up in the sky in the morning, otherwise it does not record or register anything else. Those long chemtrail lines are from NASA sat image a hundred miles long, this in itself proving that chemtrail ARE NOT conventional condensation trails. all th other hazy material is older chemtrail, either drift-in or from a few hours previously. We get it all the time here, one develops a ‘knack’ and experience from the last two years of taking notice.

Also from the above visit over toward Denmark over the North Sea (link only) … https://go.nasa.gov/2RlxN8l …. now, what the heck are those lines in the sky?

A screen capture I have so far not posted is from coastal Portugal (an often visited chemtrail victim along with Spain, Biscay and the English Channel etc) and so from Feb 2020 lets take a look off coastal Portugal over into the Atlantic …

Feb 1st 2020 and I’d say chemtrail … https://go.nasa.gov/39RbZIa

Feb 2nd 2020 … https://go.nasa.gov/34gaFNS

Feb 3rd 2020 chemtrail east of Gibralter / Portugal … https://go.nasa.gov/3e2LS4l

Feb 4th 2020 chemtrails ….. https://go.nasa.gov/34k4por

Feb 5th … https://go.nasa.gov/2JYZsYR

Feb 6th chemtrails over Portugal – NO DOUBT … https://go.nasa.gov/3c0jmhX

Feb 7th chemtrails Ibiza, Majorca, eastern Med up into the UK … https://go.nasa.gov/39NugpH

Feb 8th chemtrail over Portugal, eastern Atlantic … https://go.nasa.gov/3dW4Ucu

Feb 9th chemtrail Lisbon and the Algarve … https://go.nasa.gov/3dW4Ucu

Feb 10th chemtrail Perpignan, Montpellier, Marseille … https://go.nasa.gov/3aRHNxN

Feb 11th chemtrail Balearics … https://go.nasa.gov/34gXDj0

Feb 12th chemtrail Malaga, Cartagena … https://go.nasa.gov/2XfztUz … and look at northern Spain same day … https://go.nasa.gov/2XjhMUq

Feb 13th a chemtrail ‘invasion’ eastern Med, Gibralter, Balearics etc … https://go.nasa.gov/3e3F1rm

Feb 14th chemtrails Casablanca, Marakech … https://go.nasa.gov/3c5aeZz

lots more for the remainder of Feb etc etc but lets paste that promised 28th Feb chemtrail the Atlantic west of Portugal ie Portugal, Spain Morocco and much further afield.

Tangier, Rabat, chemtrails Morocco, Spain and Portugal, 28 Feb 2020 https://go.nasa.gov/2UOla7Z

Note these chemtrails are hundreds of miles long. And its every day in one form or other in this locality featured for Feb 2020 ie chemtrails Spain, Portugal, Morocco.

Heres another fine example of chemtrail just to the north of the area I am focusing on for this post.

Sea area Fastnet, Sole 5 Feb 2020 chemtrail geoengineering https://go.nasa.gov/2OBp5Bn

As is my habit lets find some youtubes to ‘help get our eye in’ so to speak …

And something appropriate from an expert, a breath of fresh air compared to the Clown in The White House …

Chemtrails from pictures…

… choose a theme ie Stonehenge, google for pics; result, chemtrails are easy to find.

I’m trying to use only a link ‘cos y’know how uppity and precious ppl can be with copyright.

Below, free stock photo, note chemtrail at left and signs of an ‘aluminized sky’ (my term.

See the source image

Below …. thanks for the chemtrail !

See the source image

Below are chemtrails from Stonehenge, look carefully.

See the source image

Stonehenge

Below is included as it is so very illustrative of Stonehenge itself ….

See the source image

I went thro a Stonehenge phase nearly twenty years ago, alignments, Aubrey Holes etc. I was a keen reader then and the County Reference Library knew me as an active borrower of books. There is also ‘something’ else, a real and true physical feature of Stonehenge that can be seen elsewhere in the UK but I don’t want to talk about that as it is controversial ie not obvious (no-one else has observed it, or more accurately bothered to look with an open mind) and it is merely of my own observation and realisation. What I can say and to my mind is that Stonehenge plainly is a vast un-movable calender or clock, meant specifically for this as it copes with the leap year problem, it sets order into the movement of the Sun and the Moon and is located where its geometry is quite beautiful, ie the Suns rise and setting in one day. Ancient man must indeed have been fascinated with it all. Another point in how we apply words, the Bluestones were not ‘brought’ from Wales, in my opinion they were sent, that’s of course if they were not erratics. To send stones from a specific quarry is the act of a big and powerful man, or dynasty now quite name-less. Note Prehistoric folk were really ‘into their stone’, witness the hard to access specific location for Langdale stone axes. Another point I’ve never read of is where are all the ‘stone tools’ or rubbing surfaces all these axes would have created in their manufacture? I cannot believe this point has not been raised, but then again often the archaeologist type bods are not longterm makers of tools day in and day out and I remember years ago on tv students re-enacted a project to smelt or melt bronze which only resulted in a most cringeworthy spectacle, Bath Bristol or somewhere.

Chemtrail testimony.

I’ve pasted this before but at four hundred plus posts this needs pasting again re that chemtrails are real. I detest terms such as ‘conspiracy theory’ in this house and anyone that knows me, it is ‘loose’ and sloppy thinking. What I do hold is that something is happening and we need to observe and record.

below in a few hours I’ll post the last weeks chemtrail as they appeared here in NE England.

Grabbing hold of some ….

… chemtrail pics. Heres just a quick look around at what seems credible material, I avoid the whackier pages.

How can this turn out well? from chemtrails

Interesting chemtrail pic over London:- https://jaydensdailydaylondon.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/chemtrails-over-south-east-london-uk/

Also,

Here below is artist Chris Holden, a creditable piece of work, I couldn’t agree more.

Look up,Not Down – Chemtrails. (Acrylic paint on canvas)

Look up, not down. Artwork by Chris Holden re chemtrail ignorance.

Let me add a couple of my own photographs, I’ve a six month archive that has yet to be posted of chemtrails here in NE England, whittled down to sixty; four pics from end of June 2019.

UK chemtrail, NE England 22 June 2019 07:17 hrs

UK chemtrail, NE England 22 June 2019 18:38 hrs. Note the older chemtrail has hazed to an ‘aluminized sky’.

I’ve also devised my own DQA reporting system, a quick search finds it on this blog, a blog at present running to approx. four hundred posts.

UK chemtrail, NE England 23 June 2019 12:27 hrs, this is not a natural sky whatsoever, note a aluminized haze and the two big chemtrails.

Below is one that is probably already online, posted half a year ago.

I could have cried when I saw this.

Obvious chemtrail activity and picked up by NASA worldview to prove it. This is a LOT of chemtrail, quite blatant. We had low key just a few an hour here in NE UK but France, Luxembourg and Germany were showered in chemtrail 31 Dec 2019.

Chemtrails over Europe, UK, France, Luxembourg, Germany. Tuesday 31 Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/35f4Vm8

Chemtrail in the above can be straight line, ie corridor, can be random and can be tacked on to the edge of an existing weather system. All established and regular routines. Lets look at the detail, maybe I’ll also get rid of the place labels, they distract from this photo-interpretation exercise in looking for evidence of chemtrails :-

Five hundred mile chemtrail activity from Bordeaux to Strasbourg and beyond, note distinct shadow cast onto the earths surface from this manmade and unwanted activity. California has known this for decades. … https://go.nasa.gov/2F8SVYP

Hundred mile chemtrail close-up France, Bergerac, Ussel, Limoges. Note recent chemtrail and hazed chemtrail. https://go.nasa.gov/2F9eSHn

Close-up chemtrail France 31 Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2rKKU9D

Above is a sixty mile wide NASA Worldview screenshot download; any closer and image quality deteriorates, as demonstrated in the next click expansion of the above:- https://go.nasa.gov/2QBlEuN

Chemtrails above Paris and Rheims, France. 31 Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/37rVVM9 — Chemtrails above Paris and Reims, France. 31 Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/37rVVM9

Chemtrail Toulouse and north of Montpellier, southern France. https://go.nasa.gov/35eUIXd

Thick with chemtrail in the skies above Reims, continuous chemtrail deposition over a one hundred mile wide screen capture. https://go.nasa.gov/36f4DNN

Of the two feinter E-W chemtrail corridors spanning the North Sea, note the lower corridor in the skies above Hull also contains criss-cross chemtrail activity. https://go.nasa.gov/2QcYwnw

In the above chemtrail link the upper feint corridor resulted in say ten chemtrails an hour when viewed with a thirty ot forty mile radius of view (ie sixty mile cone of view) here NE England.

Look at this chemtrail corridor, screen capture 220 mile wide, Zurich, Hamburg, Linz. https://go.nasa.gov/2QBaCph

And it all starts again tomorrow ….

Chemtrails UK

Ongoing chemtrail diary.

Too much obscuring cloud here NE England to see much of chemtrails other than a sighting late morning when the low cloud cleared a little.

Our useful friend NASA Worldview provides some chemtrail fun, a source not better than providing a one third idea of what is going on.

Boston, Kings Lynn, Norwich UK chemtrails, Sat 7th Dec 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/2YqNHk9 — Boston, Kings Lynn, Norwich UK chemtrails, Sat 7th Dec 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/2YqNHk9

Its not perfume they are spraying!

In my opinion in the above at least half of the ‘weather / cloud’ visible is manmade, the results of chemtrail activity is not just straight lines, its also the particular ‘coloured’ haze. Click the link to enlarge and see the myriad of criss-cross chemtrail lines, theres lots! Also for exact chemtrail lines before they haze into an aluminised sky, link only … https://go.nasa.gov/340tdjp

Same day there is chemtrail over Ireland, much hazed probably due to chemtrail and the associated later ‘aluminized sky’ link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2LwB41y

Chemtrails Dogger Bank, North Sea ie sea areas Tyne, Dogger, Humber, Thames, chemtrail link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2RvCg9u

Delaware, Arlington, Washington DC chemtrail link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2PmQXZL

Chemtrails West Virginia … https://go.nasa.gov/38fKmsF

Chemtrails west of Vancouver (click base layers to reveal differing images) … https://go.nasa.gov/34185cA

Out in the Pacific west of California this looks to be a bank of hazed chemtrail added to the perimeter or appearing on the perimeter of an existing cloud system … https://go.nasa.gov/2qvOkMK

All of the above is for one day only. To see chemtrail activity captured at its fullest see 17th November 2019 on NASA Worldview, a page that strangely would not upload or be available for days after it was due and the best / worst example of chemtrail in Europe and the UK.

Examples of chemtrail activity 17th Nov 2019. Chemtrail Athens, Izmir, Istanbul link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2RwYGHs

Chemtrails Hamburg, Bremen, Kiel … https://go.nasa.gov/343E2RI

Chemtrails UK overall view. https://go.nasa.gov/2P2ByP6

Chemtrail Isle of Man, southern Scotland, Borders, Glasgow, Edinburgh … https://go.nasa.gov/2s9FSU4

Chemtrail southern England, East Anglia, London, English Channel, Dover … https://go.nasa.gov/2LyQF0W

etc etc

Loop di loop … chemtrail evidence.

Chemtrails New Mexico, Arizona, Texas.

The chemtrail evidence is that the trail deposited remains in the sky, just as we witness from the ground. I see occasional loops here too, 6k miles away in NE England. But NASA Worldview is merely a snapshot of time and misses most of what is happening.

Note the shadow cast onto the land, theres many more chemtrail tracks if you cast a wider net; the area ‘loop di loop’ covered looks to be fifty miles by eighty miles.

Its a huge swathe of chemtrail (assuming my photo-interpretation skills are correct) and significantly / fundamentally alters the sunlight levels and climate across southern USA on this particular day Friday 6th Dec 2019.

My arguament to chemtrail deniers is the PERSISTENCE of these chemtrail tracks in the first screen capture below, at LEAST FOUR TO FIVE HUNDRED MILES OF SINGLE TRACK CHEMTRAIL that does not WEAKEN OR DIMINISH EVEN AFTER MORE THAN AN HOURS FLYING TIME. And casts a very visible shadow on the land. The proof is 99% … this cannot be condensation.

As beautifully stated by a youtuber on an embed from my previous post …. “Its not perfume they are spraying”.

Its my opinion that the CA wildfires were much exacerbated by nano-particle aluminium from years of chemtrails, likewise extraordinarilly high levels of childhood autism and the death / loss of marine and freshwater primary level bio-diverstity ie plankton, algae, diatoms and hence zooplankton, all of which is indispensable to all marine life no matter how big the eventual food chain grazer, much of it ie diatoms are only visible with a microscope. The irony of the latter is devastating, seventy percent of the worlds oil and gas originates from ancient diatom deposits, no-one has ever seen an individual diatom with the naked eye, however the oil and hence gas which generally settled into underground strata from diatoms and the burning of which has lead to our present predicament ie global warming and mass extinction. It would be hard to make this up. I also think it is the loss of diatoms from the bryozoan-diatom symbiosis which has lead to the loss of coral reef. This latter point is very hard to find in sufficient detail on the web, as we are increasingly realising the time taken for observations to completed peer review is is far too long, we no longer can afford the previous delay.

I need to be enlightened on this and many points, my newer Windows 10 and Bing search results are paltry compared to my old methods ie Windows XP my old setup.

Fifty mile by eighty mile loop di loop chemtrail geoengineering Friday 6th Dec 2019 central USA. El Paso, Lubbock, Odessa, Amarillo. https://go.nasa.gov/2DWLpzY

Arizona, New Mexico, Texas chemtrails Friday 6th Dec 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2Yngzd8

Note chemtrail geoengineering looks to extend across Arizona, New Mexico and Texas in the above NASA Worldview screen capture. However realise I am merely a self-taught hobbyist, not a pro Meteorologist. The latter of course have signed the Official Secrets Act or whatever is the USA equivalent and therefore of course cannot offer any comment whatsoever.

Another example same day, chemtrails Bakerfield, Santa Barbara, Santa Clarita link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2Ys1qac

Mexicali, Phoenix Dec 2 2019 link only … https://go.nasa.gov/33ZMD86

Close up of the above ie one hundred mile screen width ie chemtrail Dec 2 2019 Gulf of California, Mexicali, Phoenix, link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2Pkci60

Look also up at Seattle, a frequent target for chemtrail.

As is my habit lets go look for youtubes.

Chemtrails geoengineering Milwaukee.

As the man says in the first youtube below “They are painting the skies.”

We get less of them here (NE England) because I think my steady ongoing and active chemtrail blogging scares ’em off, I reckon the chemtrail polluters avoid my ‘cone of view’.

So anyway, at random I slide my NASA Worldview search over to The Great Lakes area and sure enough Traverse City, Michigan, Milwaukee, Grand Rapids, Chicago, Detroit … get an eye full of chemtrail geoengineering today. First the NASA Worldview screen capture then as is my custom youtubes of chemtrail for that area.

Base Layer/Corrected Reflectance is middle choice of three ie aqua/Modis.

Chicago, Grand Rapids, Milwaukee, chemtrails geoengineering Thursday 6th Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2s3nCeE

Note in the above 90% is chemtrail.

Today theres many locations worldwide to catch a glimpse of chemtrail geoengineering for instance chemtrail USA can be seen at … https://go.nasa.gov/2LtBm9x and https://go.nasa.gov/2LmTB0r and San Francisco and LA … https://go.nasa.gov/2LrVxVA

As the man from Flint says “They’re not spraying vitamins” !!!

Chemtrails Scotland: Stornoway, Skye, Aviemore.

Chemtrail diary.

Chemtrails in Scotland again, it seems to be a frequent victim lately ie chemtrails in the sky over Stornoway, Skye, Aviemore. Click on the link and view full screen to see convincing proof of these chemtrail / geoengineering shenanigans that are so adamantly refuted and ridiculed by general media.

Stornoway, Skye, Aviemore chemtrails lines in the sky Saturday 30th Nov 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/2OAUl40 — Stornoway, Skye, Aviemore chemtrails lines in the sky Saturday 30th Nov 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/2OAUl40

Remember, NASA Worldview is only a brief snapshot of time, it will not reveal early morning or late afternoon chemtrail activity. A few weeks ago due to being unable to sleep much I captured incredible photographs of huge blatant lines in the sky, long before dawn, all parallel. It was a bit spooky.

facebook chemtrails and an about face…

I should really search chemtrail facebook more often, near zilch to present yet heres much to confirm chemtrails are real and something to question and certainly take note of.

I’m not fighting anyone, nor creating a ‘war’ with any government, merely hoping to bring some sensible awareness that indeed chemtrails are real by bundling together my observations and useful material to strengthen my position.

In the material below we can see older (same day) hazed and aluminized sky, medium term broadening chemtrail into bands of haze and new ‘as being laid’ chemtrail. I’ve photographed chemtrail here in NE England at night in the dark an hour or more before first light of day, which in that particular morning was so blatant I think would never have been perpetrated in daylight (pics pending).

https://www.facebook.com/Amsterdam-Chemtrails-

Scouting around we find many pages or sites that fizzle out over time. I also note how few visitors or followers this material actually gathers considering how ‘big’ or apparent in the sky above the problem actually is.

Rosalind Peterson appears and I know from prior knowledge was a peculiar case of a lifetime chemtrail acknowledgement and activism and latterly a complete about-turn and denial before she passed away in Feb 2018, assuming I’ve got my facts correct of course.

Heres bits and pieces to build a picture ….

Welcome to California Skywatch

Then the bombshell from Rosalind Peterson in later life, a complete ‘about-turn’, also I’ve pasted some transcript from this specific youtube page beneath the vid below. I wish no disrespect here, merely bringing in material to form a fuller more informed discussion.

I quote …

Rosalind Peterson, founder of California Skywatch, says there’s no evidence that those trails in the sky are anything other than normal contrails, aircraft emissions. Transcript of that portion:

“We have to stick with what we can prove. We have to stay away from opinions and beliefs. And if we go to sue someone, we have to have enough rock solid evidence that is so tight to make a case so that we don’t lose the case, and that we have many many people, in other words experts in various fields, to testify on our behalf. This mean university professors, this means people that can come and back up our statements, back up the studies, where we can prove that the jets for example reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the earth, they change the climate.
And so what happens is, that when I see though, that we are talking about suing, … who? In other words, I find that the direct proof to link up who’s doing what …, and also I can tell you that in ten years of research, other than aluminum coated fiberglass, chaff releases by the US Military, I have no proof whatsoever that the jets are releasing anything but jet fuel emissions.
Now I can prove that the rocket programs in the United States are releasing trimethylaluminum, aluminum oxide, barium. I can prove the rocket programs in the United States are just coating us with toxic chemicals all the time. And these programs are listed at NASA, NOAA, the US Air Force, the US Navy, I mean there’s tests going on all the time. The US Navy CARE program is a prime example. So I can prove, I have so many documents I couldn’t even put them all on the internet, even if I tried, because there’s Pentagon reports, there’s all kind of reports dating back twenty, thirty years.
When it comes to proving what the jets are releasing, I don’t have the documentation, and I don’t have a single study, I don’t have a single solitary verifiable evidence that the jets are releasing anything except military releases of aluminum coated fiberglass by military aircraft.
So there’s a differentiation for me in putting my name or associating myself with something where I can’t back it up. Now if anyone has direct proof, they’ve got university studies, if you’ve got documents, government documents, if you’ve got reports, then that makes a big difference. But right now, after ten years of research, I can’t do it.”

end of quote.

All she’ll talk about is probably what is known as ‘chaff’ ie something to confuse enemy radar, a v old technique.

Disclaimer, you have to realise material online may not quite be what it purports to be, there are bound to some ppl that delight in twisting and turning the facts to suit their own viewpoint, to possibly hijack a subject and in effect attempt to misinform and damage the facts as best presented. Therefore of course, read diligently, be sure to get at the intention of the text or material; wolves in sheeps clothing etc.

Currently USA scientists and environmental experts are held in the cleft stick of shut-up or lose your funding.