My camera performs badly at mvi setting and also theres other people out there that have made some v useful observations. Therefore i’m presenting material that i think proves beyond any doubt the chemtrail thing is real and a problem. Be sure to read the comments accumulated for each youtube.
Quoting myself …
I realise general media does a good job at bundling up chemtrail with any nonsense it can get hold of so as to make people like me look stupid, but with such convincing ‘in front of your eyes’ evidence why are people so unwilling to realise something is happening? Note how the sheeple are conditioned to immediately throw back the incredibly annoying term ‘conspiracy theory’ …. and yet cannot or are incapable of advancing any sensible discussion. I’ve developed a few terms to help me discuss chemtrails and my observations here on my blog, for instance ‘aluminization’ of the sky when the lets say aluminium is still working its magic even though no chemtrail immediately to view. Often too we get ‘brown reaction clouds’ and i’ve also invented my own ‘DQA Reporting System’. I also find chemtrails can be in a corridor, or random, or at a distant corridor and drift over for next morning. The aviation lobby / influence is extraordinarily powerful, just as with reducing the use of SUVs, reducing beef consumption and forgetting about airflights as being normal … its my opinion populations ie affluent West wld rather be dead than give up their priveliges / goodies. Mans self regard will be the death of him.
end of quote.
In fact with what is happening in the Arctic, the interconnectedness of natures feedback systems theres lots we cannot turn back.
Here below, 39 views and its been up on youtube for a full two years, this is tragic ….
… good questions pitched to a most fascinating subject.
Only very occasionally do we meet someone as erudite, wide ranging, knowledgable and spirited and excited by his work as Prof. Kevin Anderson.
At 05:13 above for instance in the above (is an EXCELLENT guide to our impending problems and remember recorded at 2013) we have to reduce our energy consumption … please tell that to my idiot neighbour with often front door access light illuminated and generally always his rear security light blazing away … merely to illuminate his shit-hole useless non contributory patch of three times bulldozed ‘yard’ to use the American term. Strong language prompted by severe stupidity.
I am not stupid, those that know me will say likewise but the chemtrail thing is highly emotive, ruins friendships and one has to be very careful how this subject is broached, often for the sake of sanity is left unspoken. Yet if I’m ever outside and chemtrail crap is being produced then I’ll often point them out to anyone that is nearby. What I point to cannot be refuted.
Sometimes the chemtrails are …. random, sometimes in a corridor as if mimicking a cloud formation, on worldview chemtrails can be tacked on the edges of visible cloud / weather system. I also find they are laid in a corridor say on the hardly populated mid Pennine flightpath and next day have drifted above here, a common trick using drift as the chemtrails drift eastward over USA western seaboard. Obscuring skies do not aid observation, but often in a break in the cloud bingo theres mature chemtrail.
Another chemtrail phenomena usually when its been an intense deposition as say last year 0700-0830 is ‘fast churn’ in the sky above that is really quite horrible. This can also lead to lower brown ‘reaction clouds’. There can also be an ‘aluminized sky’ and quite common to see this.
I also have developed my own DQA chemtrail reporting system ie duration, quantity and affect, all on a scale 0-10.
The point of this blog is to provide a repository, a quick fix of and succinct data of climate change and chemtrails for people . They are interconnected. And with chemtrails we will get nowhere unless we observe and record … and this is what I’m doing.
Googling is aided by adding locations to the search box, Vancouver, Seattle, Rotterdam, Bremen, Liverpool, Portugal, Sardinia etc etc wherever, people around the world are seing these things. Aluminium levels i believe exacerbated the CA wildfires, produce alzheimer in bees, destroy caddisfly (food chain) in west USA rivers and streams and its also my belief that diatoms at the base of the marine food chain are probablt also compromised. Witness the hardly reported Pacific seabird die-off of three and four years ago, hardly reported and never mentioned is the symbiotic relationship between diatoms and the bryozoans of coral reef. Highly ironic as burning the worlds reserves of oil and gas which is mostly derived from diatoms has led to their and our demise. I’m no expert but i find it impossible to just sit back and fiddle as Rome burns … much like the retard in the White House, fed his ideas by dirty old people drunk on monetary wealth. Oh yes and earthworms we heard last week on bbc r4 are in decline.
Here are some very useful youtubes that advance the arguament that chemtrails are real and cannot be ignored or refuted …
Thanks to youtuber nord 80 and material he’s collected.
Useful ten minutes from Thom Hartmann, shorter vids are better vids, thanks Thom.
Heres the comment i made, makes sense ….
to quote myself ….
I’ve a benchmark pinned to my kitchen wall, it will be somewhere between three to four degrees C by end of 2026, if i’m wrong and it doesn’t reach that temperature then I’ll donate £1k GBP to the poor and needy (but i cannot see how it can be avoided by say 2030). From what I’ve read the interconnectedness of feedback loops is quite staggering and how very insightful independant scientist James Lovelock was in his book ‘Gaia’ to open this to the layman. I fear Greenland is going to de-ice a lot quicker than the ‘2100’ figure that is bandied about. Air travel, beef consumption and the need for multi-car households are all going to have to be crow-barred from the hands of the affluent west. I fear many will want to continue ‘as is’ until they are gasping for breath, in a confused state and eating basic rations merely to survive. And the rich? ….. maybe its time the rich were taxed a little more significantly. It annoys me at present at the silence from better reporting of the Pacific seabird die-off three and four years ago and near universal omission to mention the role diatoms play both as the base of the marine food chain, symbiosis with the now departed bryozoans and producing DMS and conversion of CO2 to O. As you rightly say IPCC is a most emasculated and lamentable in some respects charade, i realise its better than nothing but do we continually have to be making excuses? They didn’t even include Prof Peter Wadhams re Arctic ice !! The worlds expert.
And i forgot to say the IPCC do not even factor in the impending release of methane in its three forms ie geological, microbial and thawing hydrates.
Its a tricky thing to read and gets trickier when you gain experience. Below is my continuing chemtrail diary, Tuesday to Tuesday
N E England today 5th March 2019, occasional chemtrail with obscuring lower cloud cover but of course googling nasa worldview creates nothing but a disconnect. Like … ‘what i see is not what I’ve seen’ !
So when we do see the real shenanigans on worldview i tend to assume it was chemtrail mayhem at that location.
You need to look carefully, to give it consideration, the key is the particular grey denoting chemtrail.
Contd … chemtrails on nasa worldview 6th March 2019 is a feast of chemtrail, some USA and altered worldview, most a spectacular chemtrail event in the Med as below.
Above, https://go.nasa.gov/2H4LDs6 … that is a mass of chemtrail over the Med. Today NE UK has been 98% low cloud, twice spied chemtrail in gap in clouds of a minute or so. Funnilly enough my throat and eyes been sore these last few weeks, these are cited as ‘classic’ chemtrail reactions. I dunno, all i can do is hypothesise and exercise my imagination. But certainly ‘something’ is going on. And time will tell as the saying goes.
Below is a wider view of above …
A lot of what we are doing here reminds me of WW2 RAF photo-interpretation.
To my mind the above is chemtrail, the colour or particular hue of grey gives it away. Click the link and click again to gain a magnified view…. it ain’t fairy dust !
If my instincts are correct, this is more than just a spray nozzle fitted to existing scheduled flights. I cannot entertain many of the wilder theories, I suspect its merely to increase reflectivity, therefore i expect a lot more of this in 2019.
chemtrail diary Thursday 7th March 2019 … here below we find chemtrail evidence between Tunisia, Pantellaria and Sicily. Likewise skipping over to northern Turkey there is also the characteristic ‘dove grey’ indication of chemtrails, Italy and Balearics too. Ditto Belarus and Ukraine today.
Friday, nothing new, nothing here above. v changable above in first two hours of daylight, maybe slightly aluminized sky.
Saturday 9th March 2019 started clear, then grey and dull by nine, by noon brighter, 70% blue sky. No chemtrails visible above at 1300 hrs, plenty of time to go. However worldview shows yet again a lot of chemtrails over the Black Sea … https://go.nasa.gov/2HaMWGd
Click to expand or visit the link, look closely to see mathematically precise straight line chemtrails, note also top RH.
Late evening now, chemtrails and abruptly ‘stopped’ say ten miles to the south from my ‘cone of view’ ie NE England teatime / sunset. V slowly drifting north, otherwise nothing seen all day.
However worldview shows Pacific / west coast USA a significant band of chemtrail. Likewise below we see obvious chemtrail above Charleston and Savannah, Georgia and South Carolina, USA.
Again, its the colour that indicates where the chemtrails lurk.
chemtrail diary Sunday 10th March 2019. I was keen and thirsty to see chemtrails up above, but obscuring gray uniformity meant nothing to see. Some gaps by mid-afternoon, suprisingly still nothing visible as a chemtrail ! I’m always suspicious.
So lets look at worldview ….
Chemtrail diary north east UK Monday 11th March 2019. Incredible bright blue morning, staggeringly no chemtrails to spoil it here. Uh-oh … until noon, then chemtrails start and low quantity chemtrail (random) until 4pm when the sky gets increasingly dark and grey, at5pm its unusually dark. All afternoon a slightly aluminized sky increasing, no fast churn. Tuesday morning, chemtrails start 0730, completely obscured by 0830.
Possibly I’ve overlooked this link, its inevitable climate change fatigue kicks in and we must remember to live our lives and not be over-consumed with the web keyboards and screens, incredible thieves of time. I also wonder at how google manipulates and quite how and why we are steered to particular content, but never mind that for now.
I think we all know as children that ice disappears far quicker than we can realise, next morning waking up and Bingo its all gone. Its laughable when we read of headlines or targets utilising ‘two degrees by the end of the century’ … lets say its more likely four degrees (or more) by 2025 ie six years from now … in my opinion I cannot see how this can be avoided.
Greenland we read will add 23 feet to global water levels, that is one heck of a lot of cities rendered inoperable, likewise nuclear power plants. With it come tsunamis, el Nino due to increased freshwater and associated rainfall and associated high winds. Its a horrible set of interconnected feedback loops, we read that such increased pressure on tectonic plates will cause plate movements. Right now the circulations of water and air is drawing cold out of the Arctic and pumping warmth into it. This looks bad for the remaining ice sheet (albedo / reflecting the suns rays) for thawing methane hydrate etc etc. Remember my illustration of the usable space we have on this planet, it corresponds to a one thou thick (0.001 in) cigarette paper licked onto a childs eight inch football. This illustration of mine also displays how our usable planetary space is so vulnerable to a changed set of circumstances or influencing factors.
I think at the moment with accelerated changes information is a little slow to seep through, theres a time-lag, scientists have always a need to be certain of their observations. Therefore what is actually happening ie jet stream, methane hydrates, ice melt is probably worse than we realise, or putting it less alarmist the data is moving too fast ahead of us.
Its baffling how in all this we still have the ‘counter-information movement’ that on google page one is adamant to correct any thoughts of climate change and that good ‘ol fossil fuels are our friends! I praise Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in having the guts to get the message out that every single person is responsible for their carbon footprint, the energy and resources in day to day life ie to drastically reduce air travel, the need to minimise beef consumption. Even here at my own place the washing machine broke a month ago and I’m quite capable of washing by hand. I am lucky, theres next to no dirt or grime on my clothes so therefore an hours soak in washing powder gets ’em as clean as any machine wash. So far i quite like this non-electric approach but of course deep winter will make it a quite onerous task and I do not have a houseful of kids and a husband to keep well presented.
James Lovelock in the text for his book ‘Gaia’ long before it became common knowledge among ordinary people stresses the interconnectedness of natures many feedback loops, how earth is one heck of a developed and refined self regulating machine. Very much an independant Scientist and all the better for it.
In the link below the academic writing as Sam Carana is ahead of most of us (at least as to what we admit publicly) in his thinking. The apparent slowness, obfuscation and plain simple ignorance of trump and his backers and suchlike journalists and so-called news sites is staggeringly stupid, near beyond belief if other than it is real and happening. http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2019/02/a-rise-of-18c-or-324f-by-2026.html
postscript …. 7th March 2019 bbc r4 news at 6pm we get a tailend at near the end of the prog re Greenland ice melt and how nowadays there is far more rain (pouring onto the ice massif). Uh-oh, i reckon my 4 deg C by 2025 could well occur…. i would hardly think there could be much of the Greenland ice sheet remaining?
On bbc r4 this week we had ‘Inside Science’ devote a segment to the prospect of the increasing methane levels in the next few years, Professor Euan Nisbet from Royal Holloway University of London emphasising tropical wetland methane but if my ears are working correctly never once mentioned Arctic methane.
I am assuming tropical methane is a more steady state influence yet the Arctic variety in its three forms ie geological, microbial and thawing hydrates is on an astoundingly high trajectory of growth ie explosions of methane off the chart so to speak.
bbc radio is often a bit wonky and yet another example and shame upon the presentation of the subject.
I’ve blogged on Arctic methane previously, plenty of tags.
One cannot help but feel we are plunged into darkness whilst having just entered a strange new room, our steps are tiny, we will tentatively, timidly grasp at anything.
I find it profoundly irritating (and I refuse to take part) that we have to ‘log in’ to use the listen again facilityfor bbc radio, this is new and a bloody nuisance …