Aluminium and earthworms …

I’ve done lots with the microscope over the years and need help in finding how increased aluminium levels are affecting earthworms. In turn this draws in the problems all insects and invertebrates and microscopic life in soil, everything. But I cannot find anything up to date. Its further compounded that chemtrails and  aluminium accumulation are still regarded as a highly subjective even suspect area of enquiry. ….. talk about fiddling whilst Rome burns!

If worms and microscopic soil life, molds, bacteria, diatoms, algae etc are much reduced then conventional agriculture is highly compromised. Earth, the soil mixture that allows us to raise plants and crops, herbs etc is a wonderful thing, even the smell of it has a specific reason and name.  I wonder how much if at all the average school pupil gets to hear of this, not as some droning ‘it has to be done’ part of a curricula but as something to be excited about, to wish to know more?

To start the ball rolling, I intend to add to this search for the compromise on soil life re inc aluminium levels and hope others can contribute  …..

let me paste his letter here, I quote…

Greeting to all from Francis:

We got sweep nets to check out local insects, as we have not been seeing the usual. For the last 3 years terrestrial bugs have been about 20% of normal populations. This year the populations appear to be about 10% of normal. The most populous are the true bugs and aphids, suckers, while the chewers are nearly absent except for a very few grasshoppers of the flying locust type.

The aquatics have been about 10% of normal, except in springwater areas, for 5 years. The types that live in mud are particularly absent. The trout are in poor condition, and the size of wild fish has generally declined in local streams. I wll go fishing as usual, but when I catch something, it usually has only a few terrestrial like ants in the stomach, and is usually a hatchery fish.

I’m just reporting what my sampling has found. I very much hope this is just a long-term anomaly, but I am beginning to suspect it is not because the effects are so widespread. Point pollution affects only one stream. Air pollution affects them all, and I suspect its the Welsbach elements.

O Lord, may I be all wrong about this. BF”


Thats a start, this post re aluminium and earthworms is a work in progress.

This is useful …


Essential listening…

This is a good vid, straight into the nitty gritty … the stupidity of trump, the urgency of climate change, the arrogance and blind refusal of the GOP to accept climate change being real and the problem is here right now … notice Noam Chomsky tells us of the obscene roll-back of USA Emmisions Laws … they admit they don’t care and it ‘doesn’t matter’ ….. the bar is set so low now that people are limboing in the mud itself.


Chemtrail nonsense …

Yesterday Monday 14th 2019 was quite obscene in the blatant chemtrails above. Previous two days were sometimes clear and chemtrail activity slight. Prior to that for say three days mostly obscured skies with peeps of chemtrail only later in the afternoon. Only time in the last year since I ‘turned-on’ to observing chemtrails to be chemtrail free were in the two weeks of bright blue sky prior to the Royal Wedding.

Yesterday on my chemtrail reporting system ie DQA the day 14th Jan 2019 rates as 933 ie duration 9/10; quantity as 3/10 and affect of such chemtrails 3/10… 922 wld I think have been a trifle conservative a rating though possibly applicable; after all come Feb March it’ll go crazy again.  What I witnessed was classic textbook illustration of chemtrail then resultant hazing and rippled cloud effect. Though of course as we know there is no textbook for chemtrail as a civilian observer in 2019, merely military material from years ago that I’ve never seen. This morning Tuesday 15th Jan its grey / overcast with what I term slight aluminisation in the visible cloud surface, so here I am typing up yesterdays chemtrail nonsense.

Therefore using my DQA reporting system …

Mon 14th Jan 2019 DQA 933 MP(f) ie mid pressure and falling

Tues 15th Jan 2019 DQA 622 MP(f)


Pics below are Monday the ‘big day’ so to speak. Note to sceptics …

  • these things persist, do not disappear as conventional condensation trails.
  • chemtrails alter a sky and in extremes cases create v fast change/ turmoil.
  • CA has had chemtrails for decades, high aluminium levels are the result.
  • wildfire is much increased due to the incendiary property of aluminium.
  • bee decline, suspected aluminium causing dementia, like wise caddisfly in lakes and streams, I also suspect diatoms, algae, all are multiple vital and indispensable strata of marine and freshwater food chain.
  • can be random, can be in a corridor, can be laid somewhere else and use drift to cover / affect somewhere else.
  • alters skies, rainfall, obscures the sun and hinders green growth.



Chemtrail diary contd …

Wed 16th Jan 2019  has been a fast falling barometric day but with high blue skies, most unusual nowadays.  Zero chemtrail activity and in fact hardly any aircraft to observe, chemtrail or otherwise. And so I wonder if tomorrow we will be hooked into a chemtrail day ?  My new slogan is …

‘wise up – CARBON DOWN’.

Chemtrail diary contd …

Friday 18th Jan was the biggie, for two days prev it was clearish skies but not any chemtrails, quite startling in comparison to the chemtrail days. I wld say on my DQA reporting system (a rework of the radio communication RST system of which I’m familiar) .. 934 ie 9/10 duration; quantity 3/10; affect 4/10 and HP falling.  I missed any view of the earlier NW trending corridor that had been builtup but yes indeedy it was an ‘altered’ sky. Pics below …


Chemtrail diary contd …

Sunday 20th Jan DQA 922 MP trails generally hidden only some observed.

Monday 21st Jan DQA 623 MP a more affected sky, plain to see aluminized. G hidden.

Tuesday 22nd Jan … pending.

Incomplete food chain …

In the well produced and I assume well financed vid below it is in error for not including and stressing the importance of the smaller earlier but totally essential diatoms and algae, leading to protozoa and phytoplankton and zooplankton. Four and five successive and distinct layers in which  none of them can be dispensed with, until now of course and therefore the marine food chain will and apparently is collapsing.

For instance the massive seabird collapse three / four years ago, largely unexplained, buried as news, we do know massive numbers flew inshore a total contradiction to their habit and their stomachs were empty, they were starving.

Never does anyone talk of diatoms but heres a comment i made today for the embed below and it sums up the matter well…

I quote …. “Great job BUT …. is that sea floor greatly depleted (I don’t know the area)… also you MUST please include diatoms and plankton in the food chain, without them none of this exists. Diatoms also provide 20% of the worlds CO2 to O conversion and ironically its burning the ancient diatom accretions of oil and gas that have led to their and our impending demise. Seventy percent of our oil and gas is of diatom origin. The irony is tragic. Diatoms are microscopic and to paraphrase trump “Who would have tought something so small was so important” ….


Hint : google image search  ‘diatoms’…

Heres where i found the embed above …



Climate change discussion.

Just found this …

… its in so it has validity.

With the temp rise, the loss of diatoms and the loss of coral (erroneously in my opinion termed ‘bleaching) the bryozoans fail, die because the microscopic partners have gone. Therefore to paraphrase trump … “Who would have known invisible things could be so complicated” … yup!

I got the link above from arctic-news … makes for the grimmest reading, but I’m glad its there. As I’ve learnt and repeated for the life of this blog the past year it is the sledge hammer threat from the thawing subsea methane that will stop the pendulum of life. Its a fact, its elementary observation and realisation, things as yet hardly seen that we cannot get politicians or the IPCC to take heed; the latter as generally acknowledged by climate-savvy scientists to be a report twenty years behind; witness the fact that the IPCC does not even recognise or factor in the importance of arctic methane release which in fact will be the death of us all.

Yet can we get ‘the man in the street’ to ponder on these things, to think a little bit more ???

Go back to my post half a year ago ‘making a model of planet Earth’ we are in fact a habitable zone of a wet cigarette paper placed on a childs 8inch football. Thats all we have and so hence our habitable layer is ultra sensitive to change, is staggeringly interconnected in all climate systems, jet stream, oceanic waterflow, gulf stream, accelerated melting of Greenland ad infinitum …  never mind the fun down in the Antarctic.

Please note I always have my radar turned on for either plain simple crackpot sites or sites designed to mislead or render a subject as ‘nuts’ ie misinformation. Beware that general media can be ‘loaded’ in this respect. My own beef being bbc radio news r4 being so un-crtical of trump and their choice of words actually sounding to support him or serve him up in the best light. That is what I think is the value of my blog, quality material.

postscript …. we may as well have the video from the latest arctic-news, it makes a valuable contribution.


Its just hit me, this year I cannot recall seeing the little hoverflies that used to be so prevalant at my local nature reserve the ‘pit heap’.

In five years time will I be able to see any honeybees, any pied flycatchers here in the UK ?? … I think the answer will be negative.

Coral reef without diatoms?

Diatoms are a keen interest of mine and heres a e360yale article that as with all others never seems to involve or stress the importance of diatoms in the symbiotic relationship /actual existance of coral reef.

I might be wrong, I’m only an interested layman with a few hundred hours of hobby microscope time ie freshwater algae but it vexes me when this vital aspect is basically ignored. The answer is already there ie temperature rise.

Show any child an image or view of diatoms and they will be fascinated, its hard to be otherwise.


postscript … at our mostly okay Secondary School north UK circa 1969-74  maybe only  once did the microscopes come come out of their dark cupboard; the teacher himself must have never realised life at microscopic level, algae etc its wonders and beauty. Or maybe just too lazy, probably the latter. He was too interested in his beloved youth club, forms and paperwork that should not have displaced his teaching effort. I have literally sat through complete lessons playing ‘hangman’ (many times in fact) a kids pen and paper time filler whilst the pillock was busy on admin he should have done elsewhere. A lot of hangman….

I mention this because a couple of days ago a bbc radio news reporter was ‘alarmed’ to interview a cash strapped African teacher of biology and he admitted they did not have a microscope to help reveal a great number of otherwise hidden detail. Alarm! How upsetting, how tragic. How bullshit! No such facility was offered to us up in our village Secondary School in England. And anyway, a textbook is all you need to get through any O level or as we did a simpler thing called CSE.

Likewise here locally a more industrial area a couple of years ago publicity was made re a group of students from China (say fifteen year olds?) and that old standby photographic prop the microscope was featured, it was obvious this was a prop, merely to give ‘an impression’ of a more involved level of competence and enquiry. Again. B/S raises its ugly head….

Working out chemtrails…

This is not new to anybody, its been happening in the USA for decades ie the drift of chemtrail and using it to aluminize skies elsewhere. Lately I’m finding by early morning few if any actual chemtrails being visible above …. but here in blighty so few people are looking up at this. As stated previously any chemtrail observers are bundled up with other nonsense by the media so as to ridicule and destroy any sensible evaluation.

Lots of pics lately of the distant N/S flight path northern England ie trending over  Brampton and Carlisle, the busier main west coast flight path being above the Lake District itself. Surely to goodness this can convince anyone that chemtrails are real and true, all the crap you see in these pics from sunset yesterday ADD material to the sky, they are not behaving as per ordinary contrail.

First gallery directly below are Tuesday 8th Jan 2019.





Next day 9th Jan yes chemtrails (unfortunately) as usual. Using my DQA reporting system I’d say 933HP.AS  …  ie duration is all day 9/10; quantity is 3/10; affect is 3/10. HP is high pressure on my barometer; AS is aluminized sky. At times obviously aluminized to a moderate degree.  I need someone to feed me sightings from Cumbria, say Brampton or on that flightline.

I’d pondered all day as to 3/10 ratings and yes ‘it fits’, not an over-estimation. I dread the 955 or God forbid 977 days of the forthcoming Spring ramp-up of chemtrail activity. As for geo-engineering being the ‘reason’, I am sceptical.

Below are Wed 9th Jan 2019.



LH second down, that is a v aluminized sky much manmade.  likewise main pic, note the chemtrail drift ie haze. This is not natural.