IPCC and the refusal to acknowledge the importance of impending methane release.

IPCC is wrong.

Just now I heard on bbc r4 ‘Inside Science’ an interview with Phil Williamson  from Univ East Anglia ie https://people.uea.ac.uk/p_williamson   … concerning the latest report from the IPCC in which impending methane release is given very low priority. This is utterly baffling, quite erroneous and I think the placative ‘one metre by the end of the century’ to be shameful in its misleading nature.

There will not be any  ‘end of century’ to witness I am afraid.

Most of what was said I disagreed with from Phil Williamson, for instance stating that coral reefs could re-generate in fifteen years is utter nonsense, yet again no mention of the bryozoan / diatom symbiosis. Diatoms factor into so many perspectives of what we are going through. I may be wrong, merely an interested layman here. However to quote myself …

Diatoms also live a symbiotic relationship with Bryozoans ie the coloured animals that create and live in coral reefs. It is a dire irony that consuming the oil and gas of ancient diatoms ie comprising 70% of the oil and gas industry has led to both their own and our demise. No-one has ever seen a diatom with the naked eye.
diatoms – climate-change-briefing
climate-change-briefing.com/category/diatoms/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatom

http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/micropolitan/marine/algae/index.html

I would have thought last years IPCC Annual Report in which low importance was given to impending methane release (ie thawing permafrost cap releasing already formed methane gas, rapidly rising microbial activity and thawing methane calthrates; both from land and from the horribly shallow East Siberian ice shelf )  would have now been aligned with enlightened thinking but no, its been swept under the carpet yet again by the IPCC and its select band of contributors. In addition Phils endeavour to constantly massage downward the numbers to 1.5 from 2.0 degrees warming is taking things too far, as dangerous as any over-exaggeration, in my opinion from what I read of other scientists 2 deg C will soon come and go, to be overshot rapidly.

Why is it Prof Peter Wadhams was not interviewed, he knows ice, a lifetimes work.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/21/farewell-to-ice-peter-wadhams-review-climate-change

Its the nature of nature to ramp and accelerate as outside influences ie mans fossil fuel greed and polluting activities come home to roost. ‘Ye reap as ye shall sow’ seems appropriate. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Reap-What-You-Sow/

Sorry to get Biblical but maybe its an ‘endtimes prompt’ because after all as time trundles on what else shall we cling to, occupy our time?

 

 

Work in progress, more info on IPCC obfuscation as info is obtained, merely the opinion of an interested layman.

A few hours later and bbc r4 again broadcasts the radio programme ‘Inside Science’ from five hours previously. Never before have I been so glad of a quick repeat. I feel sorry for Phil Williamson, I can hear in his voice the tension between what the IPCC expects and his own self worth and integrity; he invites others to reach their own conclusions, this I applaud. This also highlights the IPCC to focus on published papers where in fact change is happening SO FAST that published and peer reviewed papers have a self defeating time lag that we now need to circumvent, a view I’ve held since I first latched on to climate change a couple of years ago. Therefore the best we can be sure of is to listen to the likes of Peter Wadhams and for instance Jason Box and Natalia Shakhova.

https://envisionation.co.uk/index.php/blogs/99-russian-scientists-excluded-from-presenting-important-research-as-nasa-goddard-director-tries-to-discredit-observational-scientific-research

From the above I quote …

The event, held a fortnight ago, is still causing controversy beyond the negative tweeting by NASA Goddard Director, Dr Gavin Schmidt. Schmidt aimed his presentation at discrediting the Russian’s work, using theoretical models, without expertise in methane, or credible data. The end result is that the Russian team have composed a letter to Royal Society President, Sir Paul Nurse, asking for an opportunity to present their findings, including contributions from over 30 scientists working in the region for over 20 years.

end of quote.

Also,

https://robinwestenra.blogspot.com/2017/06/interview-by-nick-breeze-with-dr.html

How the Arctic climate drama runs its course

And …

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/09/ipcc-sea-level-rise-report/598765/

 

The ‘main man’ Sam Carana reports on the limp kow-towing IPCC Report and informs us that the IPCC doesn’t even add in methane from the submerged East Siberian ice-shelf ie what will be a quick warming and vast release of methane from less than 50m of underwater thaw; this beggars belief. http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2019/09/ipcc-report-ocean-and-cryosphere-in-a-changing-climate.html

 

 

 

Chemtrails today.

I cannot let this let this go unmentioned, today Sunday 22 Sept 2019, sky mostly dull but the occasional break in the clouds sometimes revealed chemtrail activity here in NE England.

Last Friday was the ‘big event’ with lots of chemtrail above and extending out into the North Sea with a quite obscene both pre-dawn lines in the sky and a day-long chemtrail effort in the sky above.

And citizens just cannot latch onto something being amiss ? !

NASA Worldview provides say five examples below of chemtrail activity around the world today. my guess is that there will have been three times that activity that worldview cannot or never does reveal; ie my experience here of vast chemtrail activity above and nothing shows on worldview.

 

Hakodate,Chongjin, Nakhodka chemtrail geoengineering https://go.nasa.gov/31IsvqI
Hakodate, Chongjin, Nakhodka chemtrail geoengineering  https://go.nasa.gov/31IsvqI

Above, in my opinion the upper band not just the maverick straight lines are ALL chemtrail / geoengineering.

 

Bornholm, Rugen chemtrail geoengineering Sun 22 Sept 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/30gmYKu
Bornholm, Rugen chemtrail geoengineering Sun 22 Sept 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/30gmYKu

Above, the Baltic Sea gets it again, as with Denmark a near constant target for chemtrails / geoengineering.

Below, changing to corrected reflectance SUOMI we get for Bornholm and Koszalin.

Koszalin chemtrails. Sun 22 Sept 2019.  https://go.nasa.gov/30cQTTX
Koszalin chemtrails. Sun 22 Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/30cQTTX

 

 

Newfoundland, St John chemtrails geoengineering, 22 Sept 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/30hOgQE
Newfoundland, St John chemtrails geoengineering, 22 Sept 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/30hOgQE

 

Amsterdam, Groningen, Dusseldorf chemtrail geoengineering. Sun 22nd Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/30ktEHq
Amsterdam, Groningen, Dusseldorf chemtrail geoengineering. Sun 22nd Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/30ktEHq

 

As is my habit lets go look for chemtrail youtubes connected with the above locations.

 

 

 

Waking up to chemtrails.

Chemtrail diary, northeast UK Fri 20th Sept 2019.

Climate pundits and activists Sam Carana and Paul Beckwith will not admit to chemtrails being real and a danger to life, in fact they get a bit shirty when asked to comment upon such things. Well, they certainly MUST NOT have looked out of MY window this morning and witnessed the most obscene uninterrupted lines in the sky stretching as far as the eye can see (ie my cone of view). Usually I see more in the south but this morning its lots to the north. I wonder if the free weather sat will reveal this?

Also, whilst still dark there also were huge long horizon to horizon chemtrails, as per last Tuesday the 17th Sept.  This pre-dawn observation depends of course on it being a clear sky; literally chemtrails among the stars.

Chemtrails do not fade as would a condensation trail. Chemtrails haze and build up to a whitened or grey non-clear sky; so in effect defying nature.

Realise that the general media have done a v good job at ridiculing the chemtrail idea so as to make ppl like me look stupid.

On SAT24 live weather satellite we can see at early morning masses of chemtrail out over the North Sea for today Friday and also when over the land surface are orientated exactly as I see them this morning. Unfortunately I cannot obtain an image of this other than by taking a pic with my camera; pic to follow.

 

 

Postscript six hours later. In my stupidity I did not take a screen capture when first viewing the NASA Worldview image for the frenetic chemtrail activity over northern England and particularly the North Sea. At 4pm two hours later finding time to download the data most activity was wiped, only a sanitised version remains; it had even included the loops and figure of eights I had seen in the sky to the north. All has been taken off the remaining ‘cleaned-up’ image from Worldview. What can we read into this ???  What I say is true and real and I witnessed it. Damn my slowness.

Here below is a corrected reflectance screenshot that goes some way to illustrate the chemtrail activity over NE England and the North Sea this morning. Near ALL of it is chemtrail.

North Sea corrected reflectance  Fri 20th Sept 2019 (this is a simplified image of what i first found on the NASA website) https://go.nasa.gov/31GfX2T
North Sea corrected reflectance SUOMI Fri 20th Sept 2019 (this is a simplified image of what I first found on the NASA website) https://go.nasa.gov/31GfX2T

 

 

Greenland ice melt.

I keep it brief, we know fine well what is to happen;  I haven’t the patience nor attention span for a fifteen minute ‘presentation’ or anyone droning on with minutae so to speak.

Its obvious already we are into extreme weather events both in ferocity and frequency,   likewise ice melt is heading in a most awful direction, note undersea ice volume as unseen from sat images will soon in a year or two at most surprise us all. Most arctic ice quite horribly is 0.5 metres or less.

Chemtrails are getting clever too, Tuesday morning last before any visible light from the Sun I could see huge definite parallel trails across the sky, I photographed them too with tripod and timer. Also this morning weather sat revealed huge amount of chemtrails NW of Ireland in the North Atlantic heading towards Ireland and Europe. Remember this most likely I am assuming contains aluminium, barium, strontium, etc in nano-particle form.

Therefore I am mindful to ‘keep it simple’ to live a righteous considerate life, gain pleasure where I can, to help whoever I may and am so sorry we are at such ‘interesting times’.

The real big triggers are ice loss, disappearing permafrost and the dreaded arctic methane (say x120 the nastiness of CO2 in the first five years) which are land based and beneath shallow water ie under 50m water depth of the East Siberian Iceshelf, as illustrated on any map of the north polar region.

For Arctic ice google Prof Peter Wadhams. http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/pw11/

Look also how near un-reported is the loss of diatoms a particular interest of mine, these being the actual originators of 70% of the worlds oil and gas reserves, no-one has ever seen a single diatom with the naked eye yet to my untrained amateur mind the loss of diatoms is directly linked to massive widespread pacific seabird collapse, coral decline and the probable loss of ocean cloud systems and associated generation of DMS and the conversion of or generation of 20% of the worlds oxygen. By diatoms we can also include other marine / water based algae. Plankton is the next level of food chain above algae, both much neglected as a news item for the general public.

We all know as kids how ice melts, we wake up and next morning its all gone.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/07/greenland-melting-second-time-this-summer-bad/

https://nsidc.org/greenland-today/

 

 

Chemtrails Italy and Adriatic also North Sea and Black Sea.

Chemtrail diary Italy and the Adriatic, Northern Europe, North Sea chemtrail evidence.

Very sure and convincing proof these last couple of days Italy and the Adriatic have been subjected to chemtrail / geoengineering which has been captured on NASA Worldview; the latter not always recording what is from the ground quite obvious chemtrail activity.

We need a network of reliable chemtrail / geoengineering ground observers.

Ancona, Pescara, Split all chemtrailed; chemtrail geoengineering Italy and the Adriatic. Sept 16 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/307RHt3
Ancona, Pescara, Split all chemtrailed; chemtrail geoengineering Italy and the Adriatic. Sept 16 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/307RHt3

The day previous as shown below again eastern and northern Ital and the Adriatic receives chemtrails.

Milan, Bologna, Rimini, Foggia chemtrail geoengineering Italy; 15th Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/31tLW6n
Milan, Bologna, Rimini, Foggia chemtrail geoengineering Italy; 15th Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/31tLW6n

Click the links and expand the image to reveal the myriad of chemtrail tracks in the sky.

Also look up to the North Sea and Northern Europe for these same two days and see more exact and sure-fire certain imagery of man-made trails in the sky that are NOT condensation trails; click to enlarge and see the myriad of criss-cross chemtrails. For both days Northern Europe ie Hamburg, Bremen, Berlin were sprayed with chemtrail.

North Sea chemtrail geoengineering. 15th Sept 2019.  https://go.nasa.gov/3055mRB
North Sea chemtrail geoengineering. 16th Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/3055mRB

Below, over in Constanta, Varna, Black Sea obvious chemtrail geoengineering.

Black Sea chemtrails geoengineering. 16 Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/3058dtN
Black Sea chemtrails geoengineering. 16 Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/3058dtN

Below three days earlier again Black Sea.

Black Sea chemtrails geoengineering. 13 Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/31uAMhV
Black Sea chemtrails geoengineering. 13 Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/31uAMhV

Reaching back one day further to 13 Sept we can find an obvious chemtrail corridor sprayed across Northern England.

Northern England chemtrail geoengineering lines in the sky. 13 Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/31wGW0M
Northern England chemtrail geoengineering lines in the sky. 13 Sept 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/31wGW0M

As is my habit, lets go look for youtubes relevant to the above locations, specifically Italy, Adriatic and the Black sea.

Lines in the sky.

UK chemtrail diary Fri 13th Sept 2019.

Loads of crappy lines in the sky this morning, would have to be blind or stupid or both not to notice, but hey presto …. few take notice.

NASA Worldview luckily displayed lots of lines in the sky ie chemtrails yesterday at 14:40 basically as soon as the data was available for southern England, however six hours later the criss-cross lines in the sky as revealed by NASA Worldview for southern England had disappeared.  Luckily I took a screen shot of the chemtrails at first viewing ie 14:40 hrs.

Six hours later this chemtrail pic was replaced at NASA Worldview to one with far less number of chemtrails. England chemtrails Fri 13th 2019 1440 hrs
Six hours later this chemtrail pic was replaced at NASA Worldview to one with far less number of chemtrails. England chemtrails Fri 13th 2019 1440 hrs

 

Here below is what we find a day later when we view retrospectively chemtrail / lines in the sky for southern England Fri 13th Sept 2019 ie my chemtrail diary.

second version of southern England chemtrails published by NASA for 13th Sept 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/31ktrBi
second version ie altered to eliminate chemtrails of southern England lines in the sky as published by NASA for 13th Sept 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/31ktrBi

On the above elimination of the lines in the sky for southern England ie chemtrail data  note slight difference in area encompassed by the screenshot.

Same day further in northern England as was most certainly obvious early and mid morning we see an obvious ‘corridor’ of chemtrail material. Chemtrails in corridor fashion is one technique as is ‘on and off’ chemtrail spraying when making a more random / any direction chemtrail performance. Another trick often used in North America chemtrail spraying is to tag onto the outer limits of a cloud system as posted here a few days ago; link pending.

Below, is heavy chemtrail action across the Irish Sea, Anglesey, Lancashire and onto the North East as captured and still remaining accessible for Fri 13th 2019.

Irish Sea chemtrails, Anglesey, Lancashire, North East England Fri 13th Sept 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/2ZYt81B
Irish Sea chemtrails, Anglesey, Lancashire, North East England Fri 13th Sept 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/2ZYt81B

Note I am always keen to use the particular name of the day, to try and see some rythmn to the weekly routine of chemtrails.

Heres another for that Friday, Hudson bay ie https://go.nasa.gov/31kuEsk

As is my habit lets go look for some youtubes to accompany these locations …

As the first embed narrator tells us “Its the big elephant in the room nobody is talking about”. 

 

Greenland ice, carbon capture, climate debate.

Debate is perhaps not the best term but a useful search tag for google to pick-up on, action is more likely a better route. Yet here below is recent material to help us focus and realise we need action and fast.

https://www.channel4.com/news/greenland-melting-four-times-faster-than-predicted

From the above …

02:02 … Greenland ice loss id 8,500 tons per second… PER SECOND.

02:15   Half permanent arctic ice has gone.

09:20   How we will have to live and the 3 trillion that is half of what is present day subsidy to the fossil fuel industries that SHOULD be directed to carbon capture.

Author David Wallace-Wells in the above at 09:20 informs us that the IMF estimated world subsidy to traditional fossil fuel industries is approx 5.3 trillion annually; wheras a spend of 3 trillion could possibly completely neutrelise world carbon emission to zero by  utilising carbon capture.

Here below is author David Wallace-Wells that when talking to scientists ‘off-the-record’ realised the disjoint between what scientists think and realise themselves and what is released to the public for general media / news consumption.

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Wallace-Wells

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Uninhabitable_Earth

https://www.penguin.co.uk/articles/2019/jan/david-wallace-wells-on-climate-change-and-the-uninhabitable-earth/