Its worse than you think …

Fair comment as there are so many strands and feedbacks boldy going where they’ve never gone before, at least not for millions of years and at unparalleled speed.

http://www.fasterthanexpected.com/blog/

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/07/climate-change-earth-too-hot-for-humans.html

International beacon and benchmark IPCC is hopeless in its prediction and modelling, incorporating large scale carbon capture that does not yet even exist as workable technology nor on anyones schedule of budget and spending for implementation. Likewise IPCC appears to disregard that all natural CO2 to O conversion is either much diminished (diatoms) or closing down its effectiveness (plant transpiration) in response to escalating conditions. Food chains are actually collapsing, the Pacific is dieing, pollen and plant protein is already a third down, bees are much reduced in numbers as pollinators most likely because of the aluminium from chemtrails, insect life on land and rivers in many cases totally gone.

But also anything classed as ‘plantlife’ is suffering because of alumium from chemtrails, disease increased and protein value down. Note Monsanto has the answer with aluminium resistant patents and crops. We take agricultural success for granted, any shortfall will hit very quickly, along with animal feed.

http://www.fasterthanexpected.com/blog/

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/07/man-who-coined-global-warming-on-worst-case-scenarios.html

Somehow its proving difficult to hear from growers and farmers as to how their lives are progressing. The wonder of the web so far is not putting forth the data and feedback we seek.

 

Postscript 17th May 2018. Regarding media manipulation. Maybe half a dozen times to different people I’ve pointed upwards to the sky not really getting anywhere and today it was a revelation.

“Oh you don’t believe in that mind control” ….

Uh??

“Of course not but what I am saying is that those straight lines that haze and merge are not conventional aircraft trails, they’re full of aluminium and organic growers are having problems with it, its also why California burned the way it did.”

(Remember …. Monsantos GM patents include aluminium resistance).

So who the heck is talking abt mind control? As with the first two people I mentioned this to and avid Fox News fans, as I did determine from that encounter there is concious effort to broadcast material that ridicules the ‘look at the chemtrail’ activists. That indeed is nasty and explains why its so difficult to get ppl to look up and take notice. Thats why its so difficult, they have been set against any such enquiry by it being framed in the media as a crackpot notion. Framed to automatically be seen as a nutcase enthusiasm. You see, theres no tv in this house so how wld I know their prior knowledge is so affected, so conditions to disregard my concern?

 

Further material … below is a youtube from five years ago, its ‘off the cuff’ unedited and captures a need for urgency. Without doubt we are now beyond the IPCC 2degC  line in the sand; northern shallow Siberian seas and methane in its three forms with an ice-free 2018 summer will be a problem. Elsewhere we see bandied the timescale of hundreds and thousands of years to lose Greenlands ice, I think not, lower decades considering already its described as ‘swiss cheese’. So hang on to your memories, don’t bother to reproduce and seek peace and quiet wherever you can.

 

 

The presenter is Thom Hartmann now sadly gone from the show. Below is a link to his present activity ….

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbjBOso0vpWgDht9dPIVwhQ

 

Heres Michael Mann that Thom above brings onto his show, in his work to get some facts and reality out into the open …

https://www.michaelmann.net/content/climate-change-denial-era-trump-april-11-2018

… but remember trump demonstrates with great clarity and exactness that he certainly does believe in climate change, ie border wall moving to militarisation, near ban on refugees/incomers, disowning the poor, ramping the military etc etc. As others have observed of trump, don’t bother with what he says, look at what he does.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_E._Mann

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/05/start-here/

 

 

 

 

Bee decline …

Via the Grauniad we learn …

2017 av yield per hive in the UK = 11.8kg (down 1kg from last year).

1950’s typical yield 25-45kg per hive.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/oct/23/steady-decline-honey-crop-raises-concern-honeybees-future

I quote  … “Our survey shows that suburban gardens and urban roof tops produce some of the best honey crops, so how we garden really can make a difference.” unquote.

Yes indeedy … and increasingly gardens are turned over to gravel and paving! Even ‘gardening’ itself and the cultivation of flowering plants is becoming very much a ‘minority activity’ and certainly hardly ever at the intensity nature deserves. Many visit garden centres but few have any ability. My own place is incredible and so it should be, I’ve a talent and interest in such things, I’ve read books too. Many people ie fourth generation tv sufferers are sooo utterly clueless.

Potential gardeners need to be able to recognise what it is they are looking at, then they need to be able to make an effort, to actually perform the duties of practical gardening. Already at this point the chances of their success is diminishing …..

 

 

21844_100943709935128_100000584989513_22365_1226423_n

 

 

Heres a quick list that will establish the ‘bare bones’ of a planted garden …

Arabis, Aubretia, Phlox and Campanula (prostrate form).

‘Tete-a-tete’ min daffs (do not plant too deep)  tulips, crocus (also C. tomassinianus is good for naturalising) useful to plant when bought ‘in flower’.  For autumn bulb planting place sticks for when you buy the bulbs in autumn – (my idea). Never mulch crocus with garden compost, it rots them (my idea again …) use bonemeal.

Foxgloves, Campanula (lge form), perennial Phlox upright form.

Hellebore- many varieties/ flowers to choose from.

Let some Buxus (box) grow to clipped shapes – good for nesting.

Witch Hazel, Forsythia, Buddleia.

Pref smaller form of Clematis for a fence, my fav is Rouge Cardinale.

Apple in form of a ‘standard’ for the small garden. Alkso try some raspberry canes, but be warned they ‘run’.

Note in small trees/ shrubs/ fruit trees look and enquire as to the ‘rootstock’ this influences eventual size, a small M. Stellata can work v well but a M. soulangeana can be massive. Be wary of potbound slow moving hardly selling stock at the garden centres, likewise freshly potted on perennials that in fact hardly have sufficeint root ball – I’ve been misled on this several times. Beware of supermarket (used to be Woolies style) type plants, weak, forced, not hardy. Ditto newspaper offers – theres always a catch! Also ‘gan canny’ with the amount of homemade compost, its not all it seems, its the soil itself that matters and some leaf litter and organic debris works best. BBC r4 Gardeners Question Time in my opinion fails to realise this.

Lets also add Hebe, Flag Iris or a blue scented form, Fritillaria in any form, Bergenia for snails and the thrush. But beware of smaller forms of Allium (big forms are fine) as they are beyond ‘rampant’ in spreading ie to become a problem, not easy to limit.

Late additions : Delphinium, Honeysuckle (good for moths if there are any left, another serious decline),

postscript 11th Apr 2018 … https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jun/22/strange-case-disappearing-urban-butterfly

 

 

 

Greenland Ice Sheet 2018 …

Googling image search for the above term seems to provide material other than a straightforward text search, perhaps the image has tags that drift toward my chosen term.

Below we read of new studies and the hopelessness of the IPCC Climate Model. In its defence I would say its a useful rallying point and focus of attention yet admittedly it is hopelessly off course.

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/bad-news-florida-models-greenland-ice-melting-could-be-way-n268761

The inter-connectedness of all manner of climate aand natural systems really is staggering. On the web generally we also have a problem with whatever slant or denial is woven into the text therefore the reader has to put their brain into gear to recognise what viewpoint is being promoted. To people that seldom read more than a few words onscreen this will be a problem for them, a widespread problem and getting worse. A case presented as first entry google (no link here) full well tells us of Greenland ice loss yet appears to deny any form of increased CO2 being a major factor. It sort of shoots itself in the foot as for whatever reason for this ice loss (and they forcefully promote data of geothermal ie underfloor heating) we are in a bad situation. So perhaps instead of outright denial of a situation the clever way is to weave it into something else. Crafty! The comments particularly are ‘loony’ but we can see quite clearly their silliness and their unimportance. We can notice this all over the web, information but sometimes is actually ‘disinformation’ in its bias I assume with intent to mislead. And I’ve met sane quite happy people adamant their Fox News view of the world is the correct one! Up till now I always maintained the old subject of Rhetoric was much neglected, now I can see being taught to evaluate ‘comparative texts’ is desperately needed.

Who are these people that go out of their way to deny the data, to run counter to what is happening? So energetic to promote their own fixed ‘angle’ when enlightened scientific opinion shows otherwise. A case in point is the reduced transpiration of green growing things due to present levels of CO2 ie less cooling, less conversion to O. Likewise searching for sea bird death in Alaska suddenly halts at two years ago, since then next to nothing available. Bee and insect decline, the former being found with high levels of unbonded ie free aluminium which ties in with climate engineering / chemtrails. By the time ‘studies’ prove this that or the other it will be woefully too late.

 

Postscript 17th May 2018. Regarding media manipulation. Maybe half a dozen times to different people I’ve pointed upwards to the sky not really getting anywhere and today it was a revelation.

“Oh you don’t believe in that mind control” ….

Uh??

“Of course not but what I am saying is that those straight lines that haze and merge are not conventional aircraft trails, they’re full of aluminium and organic growers are having problems with it, its also why California burned the way it did.”

(Remember …. Monsantos GM patents include aluminium resistance).

So who the heck is talking abt mind control? As with the first two people I mentioned this to and avid Fox News fans, as I did determine from that encounter there is concious effort to broadcast material that ridicules the ‘look at the chemtrail activists’. That indeed is nasty and explains why its so difficult to get ppl to look up and take notice. Thats why its so difficult, they have been set against any such enquiry by it being framed in the media as a crackpot notion. Framed to automatically be seen as a nutcase enthusiasm. You see, theres no tv in this house so how wld I know their prior knowledge is so affected, so conditioned to ridicule my concern?

 

 

My friends the diatoms.

I started looking at diatoms in around 1992, absolutely fascinating as they slowly moved themselves around on the surface of the glass microscope slide. Show anyone a goog image search for diatoms and they will be fascinated. They are anywhere that at some time is a wet surface, puddles, among moss on moors, stones in streams, all over the seas and oceans. Diatoms are near the base of the food chain and utterly essential, they cannot be done without and likewise the larger more sophisticated phytoplankton feed on them, all of them are part of the CO2 conversion apparatus.

Seventy percent of the worlds oil and gas is derived from ancient diatomaceous oil trapped / contained beneath the earth and silica is used literally as the base (wafer) for doping and etching to make intergrated circuits and modern day electronics.

This recent article tells us things look bad for diatoms:-

“Most of these studies, however, have been conducted under high-iron conditions. Our study uncovers a widespread cellular mechanism that suggests high CO2 might be particularly problematic for phytoplankton growth in low-iron regions of the ocean.”

Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-03-key-biological-mechanism-disrupted-ocean.html#jCp

 

I quote  … In the largest of these regions, the Southern Ocean, concentrations of available iron are below one trillionth of a gram per liter, approaching the limit supporting life.

Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-03-key-biological-mechanism-disrupted-ocean.html#jCp

 … unquote.

quote … The team then initiated a study to investigate the evolutionary relationships of transferrin and phytotransferrin. To their surprise, the proteins were functional analogs whose ancient origins extend to the pre-Cambrian period of Earth history, predating the appearance of modern plants and animals.

“The appearance of phytotransferrin some 700 million years ago is consistent with a time in Earth’s history marked by massive changes in ocean chemistry, and this ancient evolutionary history helps explain why no one has connected ISIP2A and transferrin,” said Miroslav Oborník, a molecular evolutionary biologist from the University of South Bohemia and co-author on the paper.

unquote.

As in some gruesome joke we are just finding out about things as we are losing them. So, half our CO2 to O worldwide is from phytoplankton that now looks much stressed and likewise plant and tree CO2 conversion is modifying itself, shutting down as it were in reaction to the increased CO2 that they live among as per a previous post of mine with associated loss of planet cooling transpiration and protein as nutrient in leaves and pollen. Natural growing things, weather systems, the mechanisms of nature all look as if pre-programmed to dislike the present situation. Also bees and insects according to some are a tenth or nil of former populations and one cannot help but continue the line of the graph to the bottom. No bees observed in my garden this year to take all the pollen of my spring flowering bulbs, I noticed this decline quite easily three or four years ago. Today I shall have to pollinate all the crocus so that seed will be viable, I want to continue the spread of them here in my garden. Likewise not the former blue skies I expect of winter and spring, often ruined by non-fading chem trails and the quick-forming dreaded haze. It could be aluminium particles from weather modification ie the haze on clear blue (high pressure) mornings are to blame for the bee extinction, organic growers are struggling with much reduced yields and increasing disease which they think from the ally-rain. Even in my own garden a strange die-off on Hypericum, also rose leaf problems that are not the usual. The protein from green plants and pollen is merely two thirds of what it was.  There are so many declines that soon blog posts like mine will need to incorporate long lists of bullet points!
Meanwhile Scott Pruitt at the American EPA and trump have banned mention of ‘climate change’ dismissing or moving scientists and plagued us all with the nonsense of ‘fake news’ to further combat any reality leaking into their world …
Even the UK Daily Mail eight years ago is sounding an alert at ocean plankton loss, note the stunning image …. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1298596/Massive-40-decline-oceans-phytoplankton-puts-entire-food-chain-threat.html

Rising CO2 renders less protein in grown food; less CO2 conversion, less cooling.

Reduced protein in pollen for bees ie a third down in approx 150 years as CO2 rises, will be I assume the same reduction occurring as green and grown food for humans, maize, wheat, rice as well as reduced zinc and iron. ie CO2 up from 280ppm to 398ppm in the 1842-2014 range. In other words we die earlier, millions starve in already stressed less fortunate parts of the globe and disease resistance in plants and humans is reduced.

https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.co.uk/&httpsredir=1&article=2630&context=usdaarsfacpub

https://e360.yale.edu/features/bee_collapse_co2_climate_change_agriculture

Its quite amazing, we could say God provided all that we need for a healthy life and likewise ancient folk had the wit and insight to observe what foods were good for us. It beggars the question whether we still have that level of wit and insight, at least by those in control. I’m thinking particularly of the insanity of chemtrails, parallel lines of drifting haze that render any clear blue sky useless. Look up to the sky when it gets light in the morning, aircraft flying repeatedly in parallel wide-spaced tracks where they never normally fly.

If this one third reduction in protein is already clearly observable at todays as yet ‘modest’ situation and as compared to the next ten years or more then we look to be dire straits as the dreaded Arctic methane in geological, thawing hydrate and microbial looks set to ramp up, more potent than CO2 by 20-120 times depending upon timescale considered.

 

Note on the vid below that when CO2 increases as has done up by 45%  since the mid nineteenth century, plants narrow their stomatic uptake of CO2 as they are getting enough already and correspondingly lower their moisture release and so they contribute less to a cooling effect ie the opposite of what would help with CO2 / global warming. In addition they offer less protein, one third down, a figure that does not correspond to some of the links here of say 5%, I suspect ‘massaged’ down, to err on caution or not upset their Masters.  As some Scientists admit “We don’t know the outcome of this” as CO2 levels look set to multiply. We get a threefold result, less cooling, less CO2 to O conversion, less value in grown food.  Bees and insects have been the canary in the mine to use a hackneyed yet true expression, 75% down and falling.

How can anyone, any climate denier justify their refusal to acknowledge the facts !

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transpiration

 

 

Below added 6th March 2018 ie more C02 equals less nuitrition for everybody :-

https://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2017/09/13/food-nutrients-carbon-dioxide-000511

https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2016/Q2/rising-co2-levels-reduce-protein-in-crucial-pollen-source-for-bees.html

https://phys.org/news/2017-08-millions-protein-deficiency-result-human-caused.html