Freshwater mussel die off.

Blimey, this is worrying. I wonder also how the common earthworm is faring, without it we are snookered. Likewise plankton and remember marine diatoms are utterly essential. I hate to be a doomster but when things ‘get into gear’ re species loss it will all happen frighteningly fast ie a few years. Likewise in my opinion ice loss is being dreadfully under forecast, it seems to my mind laughable when we hear on serious news programmes “Greenland ice could all be gone by the end of the century”, even as a kid I can tell you ice goes a lot quicker than thought credible. More like ten years than eighty, just my guess that’s all.

I wonder if this freshwater mussel die-off is tied into aluminium levels from chemtrail, I also wonder at the diatom and algal populations in the river under question, the Clinch River. These last few days theres been plenty to see on NASA Worldview; but first, mussel die off links ….

https://phys.org/news/2019-12-scientists-huge-freshwater-mussel-die-off.html

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/2019/12/freshwater-mussels-die-off-united-states/

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/14/the-smell-will-knock-you-off-your-feet-mass-mussel-die-offs-baffle-scientists

For Greenland ice melt … https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/09/greenland-ice-getting-denser-thats-bad/

For Antarctic ice melt … https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/10/how-antarctic-melting-above-below-ice-sheet/

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is that line in the sky?

Sometimes I wonder and question my own certainty of seeing lines in the sky as being  correctly diagnosed as chemtrails in the sky above.

These last few days and particularly today Friday 13th Dec 2019 it is an incredibly clear sky, no chemtrails whatsoever to be seen. Spooky! Not even any visible aircraft activity.

So maybe tomorrow or the day after the sky will be full of lines on the sky;  this I know  from experience will happen.

NASA Worldview is not watertight re picking up ‘all’ chemtrail activity, from direct observation here (northern UK) and the data on Worldview I’d say its only a one third capture of probable chemtrail activity.

South Korea, Nagasaki, Busan, Ulsan, probable chemtrail geoengineering. Friday 13th Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2PILEEc
South Korea, Nagasaki, Busan, Ulsan, probable chemtrail geoengineering. Friday 13th Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2PILEEc

Only forty percent of the above I reckon to be natural clouds, the remainder is chemtrail, man-made.

Baghdad, Basra, Kuwait chemtrail geoengineering. Thursday 12th Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2LTBaR9
Baghdad, Basra, Kuwait chemtrail geoengineering. Note shadows cast upon the ground from the chemtrails. Thursday 12th Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2LTBaR9

Link only chemtrails 12 Dec Cleveland, Youngstown, Pittsburgh, https://go.nasa.gov/36yEiKk

Link only chemtrails 12 Dec 2019 Nantucket, New York, Brookhaven, NJ, https://go.nasa.gov/2rMGNtF

Chemtrails Gulf Of Maine, Boston, Portland, https://go.nasa.gov/2snEgWH

Chemtrails Shreveport, Monroe, Jackson, https://go.nasa.gov/35jaxgn

Chemtrails San Diego, LA, Santa Barbara, Bakersfield, San Francisco, https://go.nasa.gov/2stHurB

All the above links, chemtrail data is for one day only!

 

Barcelona, Ibiza, Mallorca, geoengineering chemtrails Wed 11th Dec 2019; Terra / MODIS https://go.nasa.gov/2LF3pmD
Barcelona, Ibiza, Mallorca, geoengineering chemtrails Wed 11th Dec 2019; Terra / MODIS https://go.nasa.gov/2LF3pmD
Lisbon, Portugal chemtrails geoengineering 10 Dec 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/2YzsVPc
Lisbon, Portugal chemtrails geoengineering 10 Dec 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/2YzsVPc

As is my habit lets include some chemtrail geoengineering youtubes pertaining to the above.

As a previous embed from youtube pithily supplied …. “It ain’t perfume they’re spraying”. But from the two above and a few more in the same series theres nothing else, nothing further.

Arctic methane and its speed of delivery.

As this link below stresses and it is quoting Natalia Shakhova, University of Alaska (a world expert) when methane burps it will be exraordinarilly fast, hours, a day or two, not years. And note also the strength of methane over CO2 in a short time frame, I think its 120 fold over a five year period, imagine if that can be possible when its a two day or two week time-frame for the methane to do its work.

Release of Arctic Methane “May Be Apocalyptic,” Study Warns

Today I’m using my old stack with Firefox and immediately a whole new world of links and information unfolds, I knew fine well my newer purchase of six months ago (Dell with windows 10)  was holding me back from getting at the online news and reports that I need.

more to follow.

I know where we are heading – methane.

I’ve done sufficient to know where we are heading with methane, the East Siberian Ice Shelf methane time-bomb etc. Yet in these early days of the unfolding methane ‘problem’ its horrible to see the waves of information and pictures unfold confirming where we are heading.

I got the twitter from the Paul Beckwith youtube channel.

Heres the article you need to read ..  https://www.newsweek.com/methane-boiling-sea-discovered-siberia-1463766

Hint: google for the arctic map and note all the shallow sea that covers the undersea thawing permafrost, I read somewhere it is up to 20km thick, all ripe for frozen hydrate to thaw, the subsea frozen cap to disappear and microbial activity to get into full swing and for sealed methane gas deposits to vent. Green things, trees and plants will go into reverse, shutdown and already the 20% of CO2 conversion offered by oceanic plankton, algae (diatoms etc) is most definitely declining.

And meanwhile trump fiddles ….

 

 

Climate change, a laymans guide.

I often feel there is difficulty in finding or locating the latest on climate change ie increasing methane, ice loss, feedback loops etc.

This overview by Sam Carana holds up well, succinct and eminently digestible for the layman; I am a layman.   http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/extinction.html

It illustrates the stacking pernicious influences which in themselves arithmetically ensure sufficiently our downfall and even for this guaranteed scenario Sam Carana plays a light touch re the inevitable compounding and accelerating positive feedback loops that will push us into a whole new series of situations. Its all a quite dire mix, highly ironic as its mainly the consumption of oil and gas from ancient diatoms that has led to our demise, taking away the fundamental first layer of oceanic food chain and 20% of the worlds CO2 >O conversion. And yet no-one has ever seen a diatom with the naked eye.

I think I’m correct in saying it was independent scientist James Lovelock that discovered the gas DMS a product of oceanic plankton and its importance. I suggest read his autobiography, an instructive blend of practical science, talent and an independent thinking mind.

Also …  https://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/feature/dms–the-climate-gas-youve-never-heard-of/

Sam Carana in a more recent post highlights the disregard paid by the latest IPCC (Sept 2019) briefing / report in which NO FIGURE IS QUOTED for the effects of subsea methane in its three forms, frozen hydrates, microbial, capped gas deposits. The IPCC are criminal in this neglect. However not as criminal as donald trump in the rolling back and eradication of decades of wise strategies to husband the planet more sensibly; but of course trump would know nothing of the natural world.

 

IPCC and the refusal to acknowledge the importance of impending methane release.

IPCC is wrong.

Just now I heard on bbc r4 ‘Inside Science’ an interview with Phil Williamson  from Univ East Anglia ie https://people.uea.ac.uk/p_williamson   … concerning the latest report from the IPCC in which impending methane release is given very low priority. This is utterly baffling, quite erroneous and I think the placative ‘one metre by the end of the century’ to be shameful in its misleading nature.

There will not be any  ‘end of century’ to witness I am afraid.

Most of what was said I disagreed with from Phil Williamson, for instance stating that coral reefs could re-generate in fifteen years is utter nonsense, yet again no mention of the bryozoan / diatom symbiosis. Diatoms factor into so many perspectives of what we are going through. I may be wrong, merely an interested layman here. However to quote myself …

Diatoms also live a symbiotic relationship with Bryozoans ie the coloured animals that create and live in coral reefs. It is a dire irony that consuming the oil and gas of ancient diatoms ie comprising 70% of the oil and gas industry has led to both their own and our demise. No-one has ever seen a diatom with the naked eye.
diatoms – climate-change-briefing
climate-change-briefing.com/category/diatoms/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatom

http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/micropolitan/marine/algae/index.html

I would have thought last years IPCC Annual Report in which low importance was given to impending methane release (ie thawing permafrost cap releasing already formed methane gas, rapidly rising microbial activity and thawing methane calthrates; both from land and from the horribly shallow East Siberian ice shelf )  would have now been aligned with enlightened thinking but no, its been swept under the carpet yet again by the IPCC and its select band of contributors. In addition Phils endeavour to constantly massage downward the numbers to 1.5 from 2.0 degrees warming is taking things too far, as dangerous as any over-exaggeration, in my opinion from what I read of other scientists 2 deg C will soon come and go, to be overshot rapidly.

Why is it Prof Peter Wadhams was not interviewed, he knows ice, a lifetimes work.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/21/farewell-to-ice-peter-wadhams-review-climate-change

Its the nature of nature to ramp and accelerate as outside influences ie mans fossil fuel greed and polluting activities come home to roost. ‘Ye reap as ye shall sow’ seems appropriate. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Reap-What-You-Sow/

Sorry to get Biblical but maybe its an ‘endtimes prompt’ because after all as time trundles on what else shall we cling to, occupy our time?

 

 

Work in progress, more info on IPCC obfuscation as info is obtained, merely the opinion of an interested layman.

A few hours later and bbc r4 again broadcasts the radio programme ‘Inside Science’ from five hours previously. Never before have I been so glad of a quick repeat. I feel sorry for Phil Williamson, I can hear in his voice the tension between what the IPCC expects and his own self worth and integrity; he invites others to reach their own conclusions, this I applaud. This also highlights the IPCC to focus on published papers where in fact change is happening SO FAST that published and peer reviewed papers have a self defeating time lag that we now need to circumvent, a view I’ve held since I first latched on to climate change a couple of years ago. Therefore the best we can be sure of is to listen to the likes of Peter Wadhams and for instance Jason Box and Natalia Shakhova.

https://envisionation.co.uk/index.php/blogs/99-russian-scientists-excluded-from-presenting-important-research-as-nasa-goddard-director-tries-to-discredit-observational-scientific-research

From the above I quote …

The event, held a fortnight ago, is still causing controversy beyond the negative tweeting by NASA Goddard Director, Dr Gavin Schmidt. Schmidt aimed his presentation at discrediting the Russian’s work, using theoretical models, without expertise in methane, or credible data. The end result is that the Russian team have composed a letter to Royal Society President, Sir Paul Nurse, asking for an opportunity to present their findings, including contributions from over 30 scientists working in the region for over 20 years.

end of quote.

Also,

https://robinwestenra.blogspot.com/2017/06/interview-by-nick-breeze-with-dr.html

How the Arctic climate drama runs its course

And …

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/09/ipcc-sea-level-rise-report/598765/

 

The ‘main man’ Sam Carana reports on the limp kow-towing IPCC Report and informs us that the IPCC doesn’t even add in methane from the submerged East Siberian ice-shelf ie what will be a quick warming and vast release of methane from less than 50m of underwater thaw; this beggars belief. http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2019/09/ipcc-report-ocean-and-cryosphere-in-a-changing-climate.html

 

 

 

Waking up to chemtrails.

Chemtrail diary, northeast UK Fri 20th Sept 2019.

Climate pundits and activists Sam Carana and Paul Beckwith will not admit to chemtrails being real and a danger to life, in fact they get a bit shirty when asked to comment upon such things. Well, they certainly MUST NOT have looked out of MY window this morning and witnessed the most obscene uninterrupted lines in the sky stretching as far as the eye can see (ie my cone of view). Usually I see more in the south but this morning its lots to the north. I wonder if the free weather sat will reveal this?

Also, whilst still dark there also were huge long horizon to horizon chemtrails, as per last Tuesday the 17th Sept.  This pre-dawn observation depends of course on it being a clear sky; literally chemtrails among the stars.

Chemtrails do not fade as would a condensation trail. Chemtrails haze and build up to a whitened or grey non-clear sky; so in effect defying nature.

Realise that the general media have done a v good job at ridiculing the chemtrail idea so as to make ppl like me look stupid.

On SAT24 live weather satellite we can see at early morning masses of chemtrail out over the North Sea for today Friday and also when over the land surface are orientated exactly as I see them this morning. Unfortunately I cannot obtain an image of this other than by taking a pic with my camera; pic to follow.

 

 

Postscript six hours later. In my stupidity I did not take a screen capture when first viewing the NASA Worldview image for the frenetic chemtrail activity over northern England and particularly the North Sea. At 4pm two hours later finding time to download the data most activity was wiped, only a sanitised version remains; it had even included the loops and figure of eights I had seen in the sky to the north. All has been taken off the remaining ‘cleaned-up’ image from Worldview. What can we read into this ???  What I say is true and real and I witnessed it. Damn my slowness.

Here below is a corrected reflectance screenshot that goes some way to illustrate the chemtrail activity over NE England and the North Sea this morning. Near ALL of it is chemtrail.

North Sea corrected reflectance  Fri 20th Sept 2019 (this is a simplified image of what i first found on the NASA website) https://go.nasa.gov/31GfX2T
North Sea corrected reflectance SUOMI Fri 20th Sept 2019 (this is a simplified image of what I first found on the NASA website) https://go.nasa.gov/31GfX2T