climate change …

Youtubes worth listening to re climate change …

 

I have a wager, a one sided wager of £1,000 GBP, the other man loses nothing regardless, that I will donate to my friend quite happily if I am wrong on this … that by the end of 2026 my gut feeling is that we will have most certainly have overshot 2 deg C and it will be 3 deg C plus. I cannot see how otherwise, the interconnectedness of feedback loops, methane etc etc

 

Lines in the sky yet again !

14 and 15 May 2019 … yes lines in the sky ie chemtrails here in northern England. Not many per hour but sufficient to induce a chemtrail haze; a little bit of ‘corridor action’ too !

Look up, take note, I cannot endlessly endeavour to raise awareness when most folk are too dumb to realise, even when spoon fed and will no matter how reject.

For instance ….

north east England, Fife chemtrail geoengineering May 15 2019 ...https://go.nasa.gov/2JIXbBT
north east England, Fife chemtrail geoengineering May 15 2019 …https://go.nasa.gov/2JIXbBT
Vancouver chemtrail geoengineering 15 May 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/2JS8yrx
Vancouver chemtrail geoengineering 15 May 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/2JS8yrx

Note in above at bottom RH circular squiggles. Most of the haze above is chemtrail induced ie geoengineering. ie enlarged below ….

Cape Flattery, Neah Bay, Vancouver, chemtrail geoengineering 15 May 2019 ...https://go.nasa.gov/2JPJdhT
Cape Flattery, Neah Bay, Vancouver, chemtrail geoengineering 15 May 2019 …https://go.nasa.gov/2JPJdhT

Lets embed a youtube using Vancouver as the search term …

 

contd …

16 May 2019 … nothing here north east England; NASA worldview shows Biscay, northern France, English Channel, Irish Sea, and towards Iceland. All this chemtrail geoengineering is tagged on alongside what I guess at pre-existing weather system. For instance …

Plymouth Portland English Channel chemtrail geoengineering May 16 2019... https://go.nasa.gov/2JLdIFI
Plymouth Portland English Channel chemtrail geoengineering May 16 2019… https://go.nasa.gov/2JLdIFI

In my opinion most of the ‘haze’ above is chemtrail induced ie geoengineering.

 

Irish Sea chemtrail geoengineering 16 May 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/2Ef8RZw
Irish Sea chemtrail geoengineering 16 May 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/2Ef8RZw

Again most of not all of the above is chemtrail induced haze and obscured sky  ie geoengineering.

Corsica, Sardinia, chemtrail geoengineering 16 May 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/2Ef75YF
Corsica, Sardinia, chemtrail geoengineering 16 May 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/2Ef75YF

 

 

 

 

My friends the diatoms …

Anyone that knows me knows my interest, fascination and utter respect for diatoms.

Consuming their oil and gas (which provide us with 70% of the worlds reserves) has led to our decline and theirs also. The irony is profound, yet no-one has ever seen a diatom without a microscope. Once seen never forgotten, but a topic badly taught at schools, at our place a small north country Secondary School circa 1969-74 the science teacher had us mostly playing hangman, i think his youth club admin had him otherwise enthralled.

Its my feeling that diatoms are on the wane, that diatoms are not adequetely reported and news of diatoms re scientific workers is woefully behing the curve (downward).

We haven’t got time for peer review and endless conferences overseas … get the bloody findings out into the public domain, we have not the time for surety.

I’m also sick and tired of hearing the lazy term ‘coral bleaching’ when I presume its the absence of diatoms that provide the symbiotic relatonship with Bryozoans ie coral builders and subsequent inhabitants.

https://psmag.com/environment/global-warming-is-putting-phytoplankton-in-danger

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2343/study-shows-oceanic-phytoplankton-declines-in-northern-hemisphere/

https://phys.org/news/2018-03-key-biological-mechanism-disrupted-ocean.html

https://mashable.com/2018/03/16/ocean-acidification-could-hit-base-marine-food-web-diatoms/?europe=true

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rstb.2016.0397

A strange thing to talk about ….

On bbc r4 this week we had ‘Inside Science’ devote a segment to the prospect of the increasing methane levels in the next few years, Professor Euan Nisbet from Royal Holloway University of London emphasising tropical wetland methane but if my ears are working  correctly never once mentioned Arctic methane.

I am assuming tropical methane is a more steady state influence yet the Arctic variety in its three forms ie geological, microbial and thawing hydrates is on an astoundingly high trajectory of growth ie explosions of methane off the chart so to speak.

bbc radio is often a bit wonky and yet another example and shame upon the presentation of the subject.

I’ve blogged on Arctic methane previously, plenty of tags.

One cannot help but feel we are plunged into darkness whilst having just entered a strange new room, our steps are tiny, we will tentatively, timidly grasp at anything.

 

I find it profoundly irritating (and I refuse to take part) that we have to ‘log in’ to use the listen again facilityfor bbc radio, this is new and a bloody nuisance …

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0002r6y

https://www.royalholloway.ac.uk/about-us/news/royal-holloway-researchers-lead-project-to-remove-greenhouses-gases-from-the-atmosphere/

A precis of climate change …

A different style here, entertaining even if the subject is harrowing …

 

 

Also …

 

The above 5 min youtube works well, brief and to the point, i’m unable to sit still or have the stamina to a 15 minute plus presentation. Theres not enough time for ramblings. I ask high profile climate change youtubers to pls paste a succinct transcript for what is discussed. As yet no-one takes me up on that, but they will in time.

Heres a useful link re climate change info … https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtGLy_Yi5kH832k8p4e1_UQ

 

 

postscript ….

So heres a trick to circumvent google keeping us reined in to our own circular never escaping environment, confined geographically, limiting my outreach … google yr favourite subject and key in another location ( I mention this recently elsewhere) ie ‘chemtrail pics Vancouver’ or Seattle or San Diego or Holland or Sardinia, etc etc and hey presto full strength bona-fide material appears to hand ! An example … of gold to mine …. http://stopsprayingus.com/

Also … http://thegreaterpicture.com/chemtrails.html

and … https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/12/north-pole-faces-unprecedented-climate-future-nasa-says/577915/

IPCC underestimations …. COP 24

Are massive and most likely catastrophically so. The battle is with nature and the natural world of feedback systems. All were in place, fully functioning and in equilibrium  well before we walked upright.

To paraphrase the twit in the White House …. “Who would have thought Climate Change could be so complicated” … Yes and so powerful and so all enveloping. Its ‘everything’ and its as if the roulette wheel decides our fate on one cruel spin.

Carbon capture must happen, yet so far its exploratory and small scale. And may I interject that for each oversize SUV or needless pick-up there will be a swathe of carbon capture apparatus to offset the crap!

The IPCC for instance does not even factor in loss of Arctic ice; its computer modelling is twenty years behind the times and not one recognised Ice Scientist was on the panel. Its as if we are suffering from collective stupidity, the Brits cannot handle the Brexit problem, the Americans are saddled with an idiot in the White House.

Heres some exclamation marks !!!!!! and a few more !!!!!

Below is a vid tieing in Prof Peter Wadhams (Arctic Expert) and a presentation in immediate response to IPCC outdatedness / time lag / ineptitude.

Salient points ….

  • IPCC much over complacent.
  • Controversial area of geo-engineering not explored.
  • IPCC contains / embraces discredited modelling ie ice won’t disappear till end of century.
  • IPCC ignores albedo effect ie reflectivity of the suns warming rays instead of worst case being absorbed (think Arctic methane) .
  • IPCC ignores increased melting of Greenland.
  • IPCC not factoring in loss of ice caps.
  • Govts can quote any target for the future, yet we all know theres always a shortfall that is excused away sometime hence…

To contradict the IPCC, reaforestation is in a practical world not feasible; timescale too! But it always makes nice tv to see junior school bods piddling about with seedlings… Germany for instance is stripping forests to get at open cast mining of lignite  … dirty dirty dirty.

Also the bitchiness, obfuscation and sheer downright twattery of Science reared its head when Dr Wadhams chapter on arctic methane was omitted from a written book / presentation for a Conference in China (without informing Prof Wadhams)  because we are told the Harvard Prof in charge did not believe Arctic methane was a possibility !!!  Remember that methane will arrive from three sources, geological, microbial and the release from thawing frozen hydrates; all from vast areas previously frozen we never visit nor can visualise in their seemingly endless expanse, ie East Siberian ice shelf which exists in huge swathes of shallow sea.

Interestingly Stuarts presentation included ‘Villian of the Day’ naming Theresa May in which she has sanctioned fracking and fossil fuel infrastructure; I don’t know details.

 

 

Also, a brief list ….

https://www.scientistswarning.org/

https://paulbeckwith.net/https://paulbeckwith.net/

http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/

http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/

https://www.carbonbrief.org/