Aluminium and earthworms …

I’ve done lots with the microscope over the years and need help in finding how increased aluminium levels are affecting earthworms. In turn this draws in the problems all insects and invertebrates and microscopic life in soil, everything. But I cannot find anything up to date. Its further compounded that chemtrails and  aluminium accumulation are still regarded as a highly subjective even suspect area of enquiry. ….. talk about fiddling whilst Rome burns!

If worms and microscopic soil life, molds, bacteria, diatoms, algae etc are much reduced then conventional agriculture is highly compromised. Earth, the soil mixture that allows us to raise plants and crops, herbs etc is a wonderful thing, even the smell of it has a specific reason and name.  I wonder how much if at all the average school pupil gets to hear of this, not as some droning ‘it has to be done’ part of a curricula but as something to be excited about, to wish to know more?

To start the ball rolling, I intend to add to this search for the compromise on soil life re inc aluminium levels and hope others can contribute  …..

http://globalskywatch.com/scientists/francis-mangels/index.html

let me paste his letter here, I quote…

Greeting to all from Francis:

We got sweep nets to check out local insects, as we have not been seeing the usual. For the last 3 years terrestrial bugs have been about 20% of normal populations. This year the populations appear to be about 10% of normal. The most populous are the true bugs and aphids, suckers, while the chewers are nearly absent except for a very few grasshoppers of the flying locust type.

The aquatics have been about 10% of normal, except in springwater areas, for 5 years. The types that live in mud are particularly absent. The trout are in poor condition, and the size of wild fish has generally declined in local streams. I wll go fishing as usual, but when I catch something, it usually has only a few terrestrial like ants in the stomach, and is usually a hatchery fish.

I’m just reporting what my sampling has found. I very much hope this is just a long-term anomaly, but I am beginning to suspect it is not because the effects are so widespread. Point pollution affects only one stream. Air pollution affects them all, and I suspect its the Welsbach elements.

O Lord, may I be all wrong about this. BF”

unquote.

Thats a start, this post re aluminium and earthworms is a work in progress.

This is useful … https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollution

 

Chemtrail nonsense …

Yesterday Monday 14th 2019 was quite obscene in the blatant chemtrails above. Previous two days were sometimes clear and chemtrail activity slight. Prior to that for say three days mostly obscured skies with peeps of chemtrail only later in the afternoon. Only time in the last year since I ‘turned-on’ to observing chemtrails to be chemtrail free were in the two weeks of bright blue sky prior to the Royal Wedding.

Yesterday on my chemtrail reporting system ie DQA the day 14th Jan 2019 rates as 933 ie duration 9/10; quantity as 3/10 and affect of such chemtrails 3/10… 922 wld I think have been a trifle conservative a rating though possibly applicable; after all come Feb March it’ll go crazy again.  What I witnessed was classic textbook illustration of chemtrail then resultant hazing and rippled cloud effect. Though of course as we know there is no textbook for chemtrail as a civilian observer in 2019, merely military material from years ago that I’ve never seen. This morning Tuesday 15th Jan its grey / overcast with what I term slight aluminisation in the visible cloud surface, so here I am typing up yesterdays chemtrail nonsense.

Therefore using my DQA reporting system …

Mon 14th Jan 2019 DQA 933 MP(f) ie mid pressure and falling

Tues 15th Jan 2019 DQA 622 MP(f)

 

Pics below are Monday the ‘big day’ so to speak. Note to sceptics …

  • these things persist, do not disappear as conventional condensation trails.
  • chemtrails alter a sky and in extremes cases create v fast change/ turmoil.
  • CA has had chemtrails for decades, high aluminium levels are the result.
  • wildfire is much increased due to the incendiary property of aluminium.
  • bee decline, suspected aluminium causing dementia, like wise caddisfly in lakes and streams, I also suspect diatoms, algae, all are multiple vital and indispensable strata of marine and freshwater food chain.
  • can be random, can be in a corridor, can be laid somewhere else and use drift to cover / affect somewhere else.
  • alters skies, rainfall, obscures the sun and hinders green growth.

 

 

Chemtrail diary contd …

Wed 16th Jan 2019  has been a fast falling barometric day but with high blue skies, most unusual nowadays.  Zero chemtrail activity and in fact hardly any aircraft to observe, chemtrail or otherwise. And so I wonder if tomorrow we will be hooked into a chemtrail day ?  My new slogan is …

‘wise up – CARBON DOWN’.

Chemtrail diary contd …

Friday 18th Jan was the biggie, for two days prev it was clearish skies but not any chemtrails, quite startling in comparison to the chemtrail days. I wld say on my DQA reporting system (a rework of the radio communication RST system of which I’m familiar) .. 934 ie 9/10 duration; quantity 3/10; affect 4/10 and HP falling.  I missed any view of the earlier NW trending corridor that had been builtup but yes indeedy it was an ‘altered’ sky. Pics below …

 

Chemtrail diary contd …

Sunday 20th Jan DQA 922 MP trails generally hidden only some observed.

Monday 21st Jan DQA 623 MP a more affected sky, plain to see aluminized. G hidden.

Tuesday 22nd Jan … pending.

chemtrail slideshow …

This is not my material, however includes things we see here in NE UK and lots more too. I need to give it more time and think about what we are looking at.

 

 

Heres another online find  … http://thechemtraildiary.weebly.com/

Working out chemtrails…

This is not new to anybody, its been happening in the USA for decades ie the drift of chemtrail and using it to aluminize skies elsewhere. Lately I’m finding by early morning few if any actual chemtrails being visible above …. but here in blighty so few people are looking up at this. As stated previously any chemtrail observers are bundled up with other nonsense by the media so as to ridicule and destroy any sensible evaluation.

Lots of pics lately of the distant N/S flight path northern England ie trending over  Brampton and Carlisle, the busier main west coast flight path being above the Lake District itself. Surely to goodness this can convince anyone that chemtrails are real and true, all the crap you see in these pics from sunset yesterday ADD material to the sky, they are not behaving as per ordinary contrail.

First gallery directly below are Tuesday 8th Jan 2019.

 

 

 

 

Next day 9th Jan yes chemtrails (unfortunately) as usual. Using my DQA reporting system I’d say 933HP.AS  …  ie duration is all day 9/10; quantity is 3/10; affect is 3/10. HP is high pressure on my barometer; AS is aluminized sky. At times obviously aluminized to a moderate degree.  I need someone to feed me sightings from Cumbria, say Brampton or on that flightline.

I’d pondered all day as to 3/10 ratings and yes ‘it fits’, not an over-estimation. I dread the 955 or God forbid 977 days of the forthcoming Spring ramp-up of chemtrail activity. As for geo-engineering being the ‘reason’, I am sceptical.

Below are Wed 9th Jan 2019.

 

 

LH second down, that is a v aluminized sky much manmade.  likewise main pic, note the chemtrail drift ie haze. This is not natural.

 

chemtrails UK

 

 

 

First two images top above is a brief glimpse of chemtrails otherwise obscured all morning.

January chemtrail diary 2019.

Today 7th Jan is first time we have dipped from a two week continuous run of HP days. Most days are obscuring lower cloud, yesterday Sunday was unusually clear until lunchtime but  noticable chemtrails from the SE. Later afternoon in short periods of cloud gap yes again chemtrails as this morning 7th Jan, all lower obscured sky but in a break yes theres chemtrail above in an obscured otherwise fine bright sky ie top two pics.

Theres subtleties in observation that to most ‘served on a plate tv folk’ are difficult to assimilate, general media has bundled up chemtrail with nonsense theories and rendered ppl such as myself as idiots. Very risky mentioning this to anyone face to face, expect ridicule. However I am an independant person, can think for myself; I’m lucky, often I can see to distant horizons and have time to look up to observe and record, I do not jump to any wild conclusions.

  • They can spray chemtrail in a trending axis;  a ‘loose’ corridor ie low volume of flights.
  • They can spray chemtrail in an intense build up along a corridor, many flights.
  • Chemtrail can appear random but look to cover an area.
  • Chemtrail can be unobservable hidden above a lower cloud layer.
  • Heavy distant corridor ie west coast flight path to be transported by the wind as predicted by the weathermen. Result is an aluminized sky but no visible chemtrail.
  • Occasionally after sunset, or before sunrise.

All this crap produces altered skies, aluminized skies, high aluminium levels for plants, for insects and all living things.

 

Chemtrail diary 7th Jan 2019 … later in the day.

Note main image below was a BIG portion of sky. Likely that all you see is man made.

 

 

Bottom left (above) is a non-stop flight from SFO to Munich, 39k feet (7.4 miles) … which fine and dandy international air travel is it will eventually have to be much curtailed. Can we not cut back a bit? Its all carbon footprint and this is proving our downfall. These flights however will in all practicality seem insignificant once methane in its three forms starts flowing or rising upward due to the loss of Arctic ice. This is a guaranteed scenario.

 

 

 

chemtrail reporting system…

Sunday and it is chemtrails again, see my diary for the Christmas period four posts down. Reason to add this post is to present briefly my DQA chemtrail reporting system, prompted from the old radio operator RST reporting system ie 599 etc. Handy, concise, it works.

Be warned, general media have done their best to bundle up chemtrail with nonsense irrelevant garbage news so as to discredit people that question what they see.

Heres my diary of chemtrail observation for the Christmas period …https://climate-change-briefing.com/2018/12/23/chemtrails-uk-3/

For example … Sunday 30th Dec 2018 chemtrails UK … yup, low level activity chemtrail all day, I suspect signs of 28th Dec heavy layers drifting over from the west still in the air. Visible trails from early morning, lower cloud sometimes obscures but when a break occurs yes theres the trails. On my half-forgotten DQA reporting idea/ system I’d say …..

Duration is 9/10; Quantity is 2/10; Altered sky 2/10… DQA 9,2,2.

Yes its subjective, requires some operator skill and experience, but in this world of ‘dumbed down’ we have to make an effort sometime.

We can also add the barometric pressure, chemtrails seem particularly prevalent when its a high pressure day, as if intentionally to ruin the bright clear sky. Therefore DQA 9,2,3, HP. I think that is why we are having this weather / cloud modification in winter when its not really needed, to get us used to seeing such things for the big effects in spring and summer. I actually do not agree with the overall idea of this procedure, the blanket effect at night negates any daytime benefit.

Many days that have intervals of apparently  ‘bluish-clearish sky’ are not actually the clear sky as they could be but are in fact chemtrail hazed; look carefully to see the aluminized sky.

Its occurred to me that Meteorologists will be now required to sign the Official Secrets Act, no way can anyone be involved in weather forecasting or handling such data and not be required to do this.

Its very clever how the general media, Fox in particular bundle up chemtrails with ‘crazy stuff’ so that most ppl would ridicule my attention and attitude to what I see and record in the sky. Its mostly just not worth raising the subject face to face.  Look at the second vid on the Christmas chemtrail diary four posts down, a North London sky in 2013.

 

postscript: Realise aluminium levels are a disaster for agriculture, organic growers are struggling with the reduced disease resistance that this entails.  Monsanto world wide patents include resistance to free-borne aluminium, aluminium is everywhere in nature but in a bonded form. But with GM the farmer has to go back every year to buy new seed from Monsanto, none that is kept and stored is viable. Likewise life in lakes and rivers, algae, invertebrates, lower marine and freshwater food chain, flying insects and pollinators. Its as if there are huge alarm bells ringing but everyone in the building is stone deaf.

I’ve a book here by Stephanie Mills ‘Whatever Happened to Ecology’ 1989 and her term ‘bioregionalism’ is a well thought out and far sighted response to what she could see was impending trouble. https://smillswriter.com/

Someone I knew with access to the disposal of books by a local Uni twenty years ago gave me ‘The Arena of Life – The Dynamics of Ecology’ easy to read, again farsighted. Lorus and Margery Milne 1972.

Note these books are written quite a few years ago but already it could be seen we had problems ahead.

 

further postscript Monday 31st Dec 2018 … low cloud mostly until late afternoon, it breaks up and BINGO there are the chemtrails. Now tonight I have sore eyes and just wonder if the new trick / technique is to raise the background levels so that for most of the day chemtrail efforts at high alt are masked to ground observers. Things happen that are not all sweetness and light …

I’m not sure of the validity of this but lets give it some airtime ….

 

We know fine well the Americans manipulated weather over in Vietnam and look at Agent Orange Monsanto I think?  And the Brits were the first to use it, in Malaya.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange

Its all true folks; deaf blind and stupid to the Geneva Protocol. Think of the deformities of a million people living in such difficult conditions. Theres no words strong enough … following orders, its always following orders, a gung-ho male bonded saturated atmosphere of bullshit. Anything goes.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/vietnam-agent-orange-monsanto-victims-compensation-a8508271.html

 

 

 

 

 

IPCC underestimations …. COP 24

Are massive and most likely catastrophically so. The battle is with nature and the natural world of feedback systems. All were in place, fully functioning and in equilibrium  well before we walked upright.

To paraphrase the twit in the White House …. “Who would have thought Climate Change could be so complicated” … Yes and so powerful and so all enveloping. Its ‘everything’ and its as if the roulette wheel decides our fate on one cruel spin.

Carbon capture must happen, yet so far its exploratory and small scale. And may I interject that for each oversize SUV or needless pick-up there will be a swathe of carbon capture apparatus to offset the crap!

The IPCC for instance does not even factor in loss of Arctic ice; its computer modelling is twenty years behind the times and not one recognised Ice Scientist was on the panel. Its as if we are suffering from collective stupidity, the Brits cannot handle the Brexit problem, the Americans are saddled with an idiot in the White House.

Heres some exclamation marks !!!!!! and a few more !!!!!

Below is a vid tieing in Prof Peter Wadhams (Arctic Expert) and a presentation in immediate response to IPCC outdatedness / time lag / ineptitude.

Salient points ….

  • IPCC much over complacent.
  • Controversial area of geo-engineering not explored.
  • IPCC contains / embraces discredited modelling ie ice won’t disappear till end of century.
  • IPCC ignores albedo effect ie reflectivity of the suns warming rays instead of worst case being absorbed (think Arctic methane) .
  • IPCC ignores increased melting of Greenland.
  • IPCC not factoring in loss of ice caps.
  • Govts can quote any target for the future, yet we all know theres always a shortfall that is excused away sometime hence…

To contradict the IPCC, reaforestation is in a practical world not feasible; timescale too! But it always makes nice tv to see junior school bods piddling about with seedlings… Germany for instance is stripping forests to get at open cast mining of lignite  … dirty dirty dirty.

Also the bitchiness, obfuscation and sheer downright twattery of Science reared its head when Dr Wadhams chapter on arctic methane was omitted from a written book / presentation for a Conference in China (without informing Prof Wadhams)  because we are told the Harvard Prof in charge did not believe Arctic methane was a possibility !!!  Remember that methane will arrive from three sources, geological, microbial and the release from thawing frozen hydrates; all from vast areas previously frozen we never visit nor can visualise in their seemingly endless expanse, ie East Siberian ice shelf which exists in huge swathes of shallow sea.

Interestingly Stuarts presentation included ‘Villian of the Day’ naming Theresa May in which she has sanctioned fracking and fossil fuel infrastructure; I don’t know details.

 

 

Also, a brief list ….

https://www.scientistswarning.org/

https://paulbeckwith.net/https://paulbeckwith.net/

http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/

http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/

https://www.carbonbrief.org/