Crap on the beach …

I remember meeting someone maybe thirty years ago, he knew of me as a clever man technically and wanted to get me involved in the business of his new employer ie plastic injection moulding. My only and absolute reaction was along the lines of ‘hasn’t the world got enough plastic crap without making more of it’ … to my mind the only and absolute reaction possible. He just couldn’t understand how I felt about this in 1988.

https://www.newsdeeply.com/oceans/articles/2018/04/03/heavy-metal-the-new-toxic-danger-posed-by-ocean-plastic-trash

As the article above mentions, meal packaging is obscene, every time for every portion theres plastic crap to go with it in our convenience world, but how inconvenient for the birds, animals and marine life many miles away from human activity that are landed with the result.

Lots of articles worth reading from newsdeeply.com …

https://www.newsdeeply.com/oceans/articles/2018/01/09/scientists-times-running-out-to-avert-dangerous-ocean-oxygen-loss

 

Its always played down …

Worthwhile reading  … https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/01/arctic-wildlife-sea-ice/

In my opinion the timescale will contract to much sooner than predicted. At least they have the confidence to write of such things, ‘time will tell’ as the saying goes.

I will not be able to view any material that shows seals and polar bears struggling. As I’ve said before, a picture of a starving polar bear needs to be nailed to trumps head so that everyone can see what the 9-carat plated fool is about. The term climate change is forbidden by Scott Pruitt at the American EPA, likewise scientists have been dismissed or put on garbage tasks such as payroll.

 

Chemtrails UK today …

Its Sunday 8th April and I stupidly slept in, first observation and pic taken at 0745 … v obvious chemtrails and 50% – 60% of hazing taking effect. At 0900 completely fugged / hazed. One would never have guessed what had been happening, neither would my neighbours. And I can tell my garden is suffering, peculier leaf burn too.

I decided to use my brain and went to online aircraft radar and yup what I see above leaving chemtrail is what I can see on the screen circa 0805. Lets assume theres no disparity, nothing covert or concealed other than the non-admittance to what, frequency and likely outcome of so much nano particle aluminium, barium, strontium, etc and its effects on green growing things as well as humans and bees etc.

So I invented a trick, using x36 replay from 0535 until 0741 and even in our liddle iddy biddy map of remote England I sketched a full x300 flight paths in the two hour playback, probably more as they are coming incredibly ‘thick and fast’ ! I was flabbergasted and to be honest frightened. Any CO2 stays with us forever and this proves the aviation lobby and the use of aviation is utterly obscene. Its ironic really, the only populations on this Earth that COULD live sustainably ie Thirld World poor are in fact the very populations that will be lost when sea level rises and food production fails. Which will happen quite soon.

James Lovelock at the end of his book ‘Gaia’ tells us that putting humans in charge of climate change is like putting a goat in charge of the garden.

To quote James Lovelock …”I would sooner expect a goat to succeed as a gardener than expect humans to become responsible stewards of the Earth” unquote.

Consumerism, advertising, pre-packaged foods, airflights, our love affair with motor transport and distribution, fragmented multiple duplication of parcel delivery, consolidation and centralisation of production, plastic ‘everything’, the un-wholesome endless Economic reach for growth and profits, white men in the boardroom, hubris ….  all these things appear to be unstoppable and contribute to our downfall. And meanwhile trump fiddles  ….

 

Realise also the GM crops (non-fertile seed so even the poorest farmer has to go back every year for more) have patents written as being tolerant of unbonded ‘free’ aluminium as per chemtrails.

 

P1350951

Above is at least x300 counted flightpaths in two hours early Sunday morning northern UK 0535 – 0741BST. Interesting to see set patterns or routine corridors. Above is using a whiteboard marker with set at x36 speed replay. Its all free. No wonder I see so many to the south, we are at the intersection. Interestingly without the free online radar I would never ever have guessed at so much airborne activity from what is visible to me. Would be interesting to plot per hour in 24.

P1350948

That is NOT natural.

Lets look around  …

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/10/27/geoengineering-aka-chemtrails-should-be-included-when-talking-about-climate-change-heres-why/

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/01/12/top-climate-scientist-warns-against-injecting-stratospheric-particles-into-the-atmosphere/

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/137431483/posts/1397

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/122301576/posts/30181

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/46890998/posts/612912

 

Postscript: Twelve hours later in the evening I try a re-run and the radar replay is not working. A full twenty four hours later I replay the two hour plot and exclude edge of horizon activity to the west ie anything left of centre, which I wld assume wld give me say half ie  x150 flightpaths (this time not counting anythat land within the one airport in the frame. Curious difference, count is now around thirty three only ie a tenth and nothing in the centre of the scren and likewise nothing in what were dense activity. Heres the pic of the plots …. a supposed exact re-run of the initial plot.

P1350954

Forget about what was on the left, same time period, same map configuration; upper right hand is what I’m concerned about, everything right of logo.

To communicate this data as a grid start zero in left upper. One solitary path for at left 3 down to 10 easting at top, when yesterday two hours maybe 20 or 30 on that path alone, all spaced a little not the exact same line travelled. Ditto 5 easting from bottom to 6 easting top one flight indicated when there would be thirty.

Etc etc  … a vast anomoly.

Which replay is correct ??

As far as I can see no-one has done the whiteboard marker before.

This is an experiment that needs to be conducted a few times more. For instance all over haze early on, at 0800 brightening to blue so …. (wait for it)  … chemtrails starting to the south toward the local city.

 

Postscript 17th May 2018. Regarding media manipulation. Maybe half a dozen times to different people I’ve pointed upwards to the sky not really getting anywhere and today it was a revelation.

“Oh you don’t believe in that mind control” ….

Uh??

“Of course not but what I am saying is that those straight lines that haze and merge are not conventional aircraft trails, they’re full of aluminium and organic growers are having problems with it, its also why California burned the way it did.”

(Remember …. Monsantos GM patents include aluminium resistance).

So who the heck is talking abt mind control? As with the first two people I mentioned this to and avid Fox News fans, as I did determine from that encounter there is concious effort to broadcast material that ridicules the ‘look at the chemtrail activists’. That indeed is nasty and explains why its so difficult to get ppl to look up and take notice. Thats why its so difficult, they have been set against any such enquiry by it being framed in the media as a crackpot notion. Framed to automatically be seen as a nutcase enthusiasm. You see, theres no tv in this house so how wld I know their prior knowledge is so affected, so conditioned to ridicule my concern?

 

 

 

 

The IPCC looks to be rubbish.

I’ve just found a website of a weather forecasting ‘professional’ where are told that ‘the IPCC model looks right now to be the best we have’ …. Good God what utter wilful blindness to the truth.

Theres BS and dangerous BS and this falls into the latter category. IPCC models and forecasts are wilfully incorrect, hopeless and at best at least some sort of rallying point or focus BUT still are hopelessy inaccurate and certainly misleading.

A pocket foldaway answer  …

  • The IPCC does not account for the methane that will hit soon from geological, frozen hydrate and microbial; 20-120 times more potent than CO2.
  • The IPCC incorporates vast carbon capture that as yet does not even exist or has been invented and is illustrated to ramp continually in its effectiveness!
  • The IPCC does not realise CO2 conversion by ocean plankton and terrestial green plants and trees is falling, in decline.
  • The IPCC does not factor in that ecosystems are already collapsing, plankton upwards. That the Pacific is dying.

Lets get a plain speaking man Prof Kevin Anderson that deals in facts  … action starts at 11:00

 

And he gets to talk to Amy Goodman …. I am so jealous !!

Note the problem of insufficient weight being given to climate change ranging from   self censorship by scientists, the sort of diluted washed out statement that started this post by a so-called meterologist to outright denial by ill-educated and twisted old men of the present Washington so-called Admistration ie trump, scott pruitt and the castrated EPA.

 

Lets think of chemtrails and how mass media is engineered to minimise any population taking notice ie …

Postscript 17th May 2018. Regarding media manipulation. Maybe half a dozen times to different people I’ve pointed upwards to the sky not really getting anywhere and today it was a revelation.

“Oh you don’t believe in that mind control” ….

Uh??

“Of course not but what I am saying is that those straight lines that haze and merge are not conventional aircraft trails, they’re full of aluminium and organic growers are having problems with it, its also why California burned the way it did.”

(Remember …. Monsantos GM patents include aluminium resistance).

So who the heck is talking abt mind control? As with the first two people I mentioned this to and avid Fox News fans, as I did determine from that encounter there is concious effort to broadcast material that ridicules the ‘look at the chemtrail activists’. That indeed is nasty and explains why its so difficult to get ppl to look up and take notice. Thats why its so difficult, they have been set against any such enquiry by it being framed in the media as a crackpot notion. Framed to automatically be seen as a nutcase enthusiasm. You see, theres no tv in this house so how wld I know their prior knowledge is so affected, so conditioned to ridicule my concern?

 

 

 

 

A bad spring for growing things …

I was stunned yesterday when by chance I looked at old pictures of my garden for mid March seven years ago. Already at that time many things were thriving and in flower that at present this year are backward and nowhere near flowering even a fortnight later, oxlips and dog tooth violets ( Erythronium) demonstrated this clearly. Cautiously I’d say its a one month delay but also there doesn’t seem to be the vigour of previous years.  Bulbs are okay’ish but anything relying on leaves and light to bring it on are much backward.

A great maxim of mine has always been “Its all about light” this being particularly pertinent to the siting of plants and what will grow where. Hands-on practical experience, trial and error form my views over several decades.

So its obvious ‘things are backward’ this year, strange when in the last decade gardeners and horticulturists have been observing the opposite, ie things are advanced. All I can  assume is that the frequent chemtrail spraying of this year so far that turns what should be clear days into hazy nothingness has wreaked its dark magic. Easter was clear of it until Sunday afternoon (1st April as photos below) when it was obvious man-made trails were being laid.

This covert and unwanted activity is most divisive among friends, as the pictures show the haze and so-called cloud are very deinitely not natures making, yet folk who should know better ridicule my drawing attention to this. Maybe Fox News has a  greater hold on them than I realised.

Its generally considered that these chemtrails incorportae aluminium, barium and strontium. My previous pics of here in the UK … https://climate-change-briefing.com/2018/02/22/weather-modification-uk/

 

 

 

Bottom two at right are Sunday 1st April 18:27

Bottom left is 24th March 15:52

Top left is 9th March 10:02

Top right is 20th March 13:30

Right middle is 20th March 13:54

For instance top left 9th March 2018 above, my diary tells me bright blue sky at 0800, chemtrails by 0900, blue again at 10am with very noticable fast turbulence.

March 20th was obvious chemtrails 12-3pm on a previous bright blue sky. Next day early morning was a peculier ‘quilted’ cloud effect uniform and everywhere. Light effect noticably ‘odd’.

Here we don’t ordinarilly expect these aircraft on these flightpaths. Here below is my usual checklist to try to raise awareness of the not-natural effects in the sky from chemtrail spraying.

  • Aircraft trails where normally never seen.
  • Trails do not disappear as they should normally.
  • Trails connect to produce overall haze.
  • Sometimes as quick as 10-20 mins later all hazed over.
  • No longer a blue sky as assumed and expected an hour earlier.
  • Note parallel tracks or peculier bends and even 90deg  turns.
  • In extreme cases the sky can ‘morph’ or change rapidly every 5 – 10 mins.
  • Note metallic sheen to light.

 

For instance  … https://byebyebluesky.com/

 

Postscript 17th May 2018. Regarding media manipulation. Maybe half a dozen times to different people I’ve pointed upwards to the sky not really getting anywhere and today it was a revelation.

“Oh you don’t believe in that mind control” ….

Uh??

“Of course not but what I am saying is that those straight lines that haze and merge are not conventional aircraft trails, they’re full of aluminium and organic growers are having problems with it, its also why California burned the way it did.”

(Remember …. Monsantos GM patents include aluminium resistance).

So who the heck is talking abt mind control? As with the first two people I mentioned this to and avid Fox News fans, as I did determine from that encounter there is concious effort to broadcast material that ridicules the ‘look at the chemtrail activists’. That indeed is nasty and explains why its so difficult to get ppl to look up and take notice. Thats why its so difficult, they have been set against any such enquiry by it being framed in the media as a crackpot notion. Framed to automatically be seen as a nutcase enthusiasm. You see, theres no tv in this house so how wld I know their prior knowledge is so affected, so conditioned to ridicule my concern?

 

 

 

Bee decline …

Via the Grauniad we learn …

2017 av yield per hive in the UK = 11.8kg (down 1kg from last year).

1950’s typical yield 25-45kg per hive.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/oct/23/steady-decline-honey-crop-raises-concern-honeybees-future

I quote  … “Our survey shows that suburban gardens and urban roof tops produce some of the best honey crops, so how we garden really can make a difference.” unquote.

Yes indeedy and increasingly gardens are turned over to gravel and paving! Even ‘gardening’ itself and the cultivation of flowering plants is becoming very much a ‘minority activity’ and certainly hardly ever at the intensity nature deserves. My own place is incredible and so it should be, I’ve a talent and interest in such things. Many people ie fourth generation tv sufferers are sooo utterly clueless.

 

 

Heres a quick list that will establish the ‘bare bones’ of a planted garden …

Arabis, Aubretia, Phlox and Campanula (prostrate form).

‘Tete-a-tete’ min daffs (do not plant too deep)  tulips, crocus (also C. tomassinianus is good for naturalising) useful to plant when bought ‘in flower’.  For autumn bulb planting place sticks for when you buy the bulbs in autumn – (my idea). Never mulch crocus with garden compost, it rots them (my idea again …) use bonemeal.

Foxgloves, Campanula (lge form), perennial Phlox upright form.

Hellebore- many varieties/ flowers to choose from.

Let some Buxus (box) grow to clipped shapes – good for nesting.

Witch Hazel, Forsythia, Buddleia.

Pref smaller form of Clematis for a fence, my fav is Rouge Cardinale.

Apple in form of a ‘standard’ for the small garden. Alkso try some raspberry canes, but be warned they ‘run’.

Note in small trees/ shrubs/ fruit trees look and enquire as to the ‘rootstock’ this influences eventual size, a small M. Stellata can work v well but a M. soulangeana can be massive. Be wary of potbound slow moving hardly selling stock at the garden centres, likewise freshly potted on perennials that in fact hardly have sufficeint root ball – I’ve been misled on this several times. Beware of supermarket (used to be Woolies style) type plants, weak, forced, not hardy. Ditto newspaper offers – theres always a catch! Also ‘gan canny’ with the amount of homemade compost, its not all it seems, its the soil itself that matters and some leaf litter and organic debris works best. BBC r4 Gardeners Question Time in my opinion fails to realise this.

Lets also add Hebe, Flag Iris or a blue scented form, Fritillaria in any form, Bergenia for snails and the thrush. But beware of smaller forms of Allium (big forms are fine) as they are beyond ‘rampant’ in spreading ie to become a problem, not easy to limit.

Late additions : Delphinium, Honeysuckle (good for moths if there are any left, another serious decline),

postscript 11th Apr 2018 … https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jun/22/strange-case-disappearing-urban-butterfly

 

 

 

Greenland Ice Sheet 2018 …

Googling image search for the above term seems to provide material other than a straightforward text search, perhaps the image has tags that drift toward my chosen term.

Below we read of new studies and the hopelessness of the IPCC Climate Model. In its defence I would say its a useful rallying point and focus of attention yet admittedly it is hopelessly off course.

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/bad-news-florida-models-greenland-ice-melting-could-be-way-n268761

The inter-connectedness of all manner of climate aand natural systems really is staggering. On the web generally we also have a problem with whatever slant or denial is woven into the text therefore the reader has to put their brain into gear to recognise what viewpoint is being promoted. To people that seldom read more than a few words onscreen this will be a problem for them, a widespread problem and getting worse. A case presented as first entry google (no link here) full well tells us of Greenland ice loss yet appears to deny any form of increased CO2 being a major factor. It sort of shoots itself in the foot as for whatever reason for this ice loss (and they forcefully promote data of geothermal ie underfloor heating) we are in a bad situation. So perhaps instead of outright denial of a situation the clever way is to weave it into something else. Crafty! The comments particularly are ‘loony’ but we can see quite clearly their silliness and their unimportance. We can notice this all over the web, information but sometimes is actually ‘disinformation’ in its bias I assume with intent to mislead. And I’ve met sane quite happy people adamant their Fox News view of the world is the correct one! Up till now I always maintained the old subject of Rhetoric was much neglected, now I can see being taught to evaluate ‘comparative texts’ is desperately needed.

Who are these people that go out of their way to deny the data, to run counter to what is happening? So energetic to promote their own fixed ‘angle’ when enlightened scientific opinion shows otherwise. A case in point is the reduced transpiration of green growing things due to present levels of CO2 ie less cooling, less conversion to O. Likewise searching for sea bird death in Alaska suddenly halts at two years ago, since then next to nothing available. Bee and insect decline, the former being found with high levels of unbonded ie free aluminium which ties in with climate engineering / chemtrails. By the time ‘studies’ prove this that or the other it will be woefully too late.

 

Postscript 17th May 2018. Regarding media manipulation. Maybe half a dozen times to different people I’ve pointed upwards to the sky not really getting anywhere and today it was a revelation.

“Oh you don’t believe in that mind control” ….

Uh??

“Of course not but what I am saying is that those straight lines that haze and merge are not conventional aircraft trails, they’re full of aluminium and organic growers are having problems with it, its also why California burned the way it did.”

(Remember …. Monsantos GM patents include aluminium resistance).

So who the heck is talking abt mind control? As with the first two people I mentioned this to and avid Fox News fans, as I did determine from that encounter there is concious effort to broadcast material that ridicules the ‘look at the chemtrail activists’. That indeed is nasty and explains why its so difficult to get ppl to look up and take notice. Thats why its so difficult, they have been set against any such enquiry by it being framed in the media as a crackpot notion. Framed to automatically be seen as a nutcase enthusiasm. You see, theres no tv in this house so how wld I know their prior knowledge is so affected, so conditioned to ridicule my concern?