Loop di loop … chemtrail evidence.

Chemtrails New Mexico, Arizona, Texas.

The chemtrail evidence is that the trail deposited remains in the sky, just as we witness from the ground. I see occasional loops here too, 6k miles away in NE England. But NASA Worldview is merely a snapshot of time and misses most of what is happening.

Note the shadow cast onto the land, theres many more chemtrail tracks if you cast a wider net; the area ‘loop di loop’ covered looks to be fifty miles by eighty miles.

Its a huge swathe of chemtrail (assuming my photo-interpretation skills are correct) and significantly / fundamentally alters the sunlight levels and climate across southern USA on this particular day Friday 6th Dec 2019.

My arguament to chemtrail deniers is the PERSISTENCE of these chemtrail tracks in the first screen capture below, at   LEAST FOUR TO FIVE HUNDRED MILES OF SINGLE TRACK CHEMTRAIL that does not WEAKEN OR DIMINISH EVEN AFTER MORE THAN AN HOURS FLYING TIME. And casts a very visible shadow on the land. The proof is 99% … this cannot be condensation.

As beautifully stated by a youtuber on an embed from my previous post …. “Its not perfume they are spraying”.

Its my opinion that the CA wildfires were much exacerbated by nano-particle aluminium from years of chemtrails, likewise extraordinarilly high levels of childhood autism and the death / loss of marine and freshwater primary level bio-diverstity ie plankton, algae, diatoms and hence zooplankton, all of which is indispensable to all marine life no matter how big the eventual food chain grazer, much of it ie diatoms are only visible with a microscope. The irony of the latter is devastating, seventy percent of the worlds oil and gas originates from ancient diatom deposits, no-one has ever seen an individual diatom with the naked eye, however the oil and hence gas which generally settled into underground strata from diatoms and the burning of which has lead to our present predicament ie global warming and mass extinction. It would be hard to make this up. I also think it is the loss of diatoms from the bryozoan-diatom symbiosis which has lead to the loss of coral reef.  This latter point is very hard to find in sufficient detail on the web, as we are increasingly realising the time taken for observations to completed peer review is is far too long, we no longer can afford the previous delay.

I need to be enlightened on this and many points, my newer Windows 10 and Bing search results are paltry compared to my old methods ie Windows XP my old setup.

 

loop di loop chemtrail geoengineering Friday 6th Dec 2019 central USA. El Paso, Lubbock, Odessa, Amarillo. https://go.nasa.gov/2DWLpzY
Fifty mile by eighty mile loop di loop chemtrail geoengineering Friday 6th Dec 2019 central USA. El Paso, Lubbock, Odessa, Amarillo. https://go.nasa.gov/2DWLpzY
Arizona, New Mexico, Texas chemtrails Friday 6th Dec 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2Yngzd8
Arizona, New Mexico, Texas chemtrails Friday 6th Dec 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2Yngzd8

Note chemtrail geoengineering looks to extend across Arizona, New Mexico and Texas in the above NASA Worldview screen capture. However realise I am merely a self-taught hobbyist, not a pro Meteorologist. The latter of course have signed the Official Secrets Act or whatever is the USA equivalent and therefore of course cannot offer any comment whatsoever.

Another example same day, chemtrails Bakerfield, Santa Barbara, Santa Clarita link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2Ys1qac

Mexicali, Phoenix Dec 2 2019 link only … https://go.nasa.gov/33ZMD86

Close up of the above ie one hundred mile screen width ie chemtrail Dec 2 2019 Gulf of California, Mexicali, Phoenix, link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2Pkci60

Look also up at Seattle, a frequent target for chemtrail.

As is my habit lets go look for youtubes.

 

Coral reef without diatoms?

Diatoms are a keen interest of mine and heres a e360yale article that as with all others never seems to involve or stress the importance of diatoms in the symbiotic relationship /actual existance of coral reef.

I might be wrong, I’m only an interested layman with a few hundred hours of hobby microscope time ie freshwater algae but it vexes me when this vital aspect is basically ignored. The answer is already there ie temperature rise.

Show any child an image or view of diatoms and they will be fascinated, its hard to be otherwise.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/as-disease-ravages-coral-reefs-scientists-scramble-for-solutions

 

postscript … at our mostly okay Secondary School north UK circa 1969-74  maybe only  once did the microscopes come come out of their dark cupboard; the teacher himself must have never realised life at microscopic level, algae etc its wonders and beauty. Or maybe just too lazy, probably the latter. He was too interested in his beloved youth club, forms and paperwork that should not have displaced his teaching effort. I have literally sat through complete lessons playing ‘hangman’ (many times in fact) a kids pen and paper time filler whilst the pillock was busy on admin he should have done elsewhere. A lot of hangman….

I mention this because a couple of days ago a bbc radio news reporter was ‘alarmed’ to interview a cash strapped African teacher of biology and he admitted they did not have a microscope to help reveal a great number of otherwise hidden detail. Alarm! How upsetting, how tragic. How bullshit! No such facility was offered to us up in our village Secondary School in England. And anyway, a textbook is all you need to get through any O level or as we did a simpler thing called CSE.

Likewise here locally a more industrial area a couple of years ago publicity was made re a group of students from China (say fifteen year olds?) and that old standby photographic prop the microscope was featured, it was obvious this was a prop, merely to give ‘an impression’ of a more involved level of competence and enquiry. Again. B/S raises its ugly head….