Satellite imagery deletes chemtrail.

I’d had an inkling this can happen and the image here for south of England and English Channel chemtrail 15th Feb 2023 ie yesterday really does eliminate the data I would like to have been able to view.

The image below on NASA Worldview terra/Modis setting is a huge amount of chemtrail activity, remember this is a snapshot in time not a rolling update (as far as I am aware). On the day of the event other filters can take several hours before the image reveals itself. One wonders if some sort of ‘cleaning up’ is happening.

In the chemtrail sat imagery below at right I would say its ALL chemtrail activity. Easy to do actually as if you click on to something like flightradar24 the sky is absolutely full of aircraft activity. I cannot believe this can be explained away as ‘ice crystals’ or upper atmosphere reaction to aircraft engine exhaust. Surely it points to a decision being made to on this time and day to add this sky whitening effect deliberately. In the future chemtrail sky whitening will have to be formally introduced as we will lose a lot of existing weather pattern/ cloud formation. If the upper ‘cloud decks’ that roll in from the Pacific which protect the complete run of west coast north and south America disappear as Guy McPherson over on http://www.arctic-news.blogspot then it will entail a catastrophic temperature rise, this trigger will be increased CO2 and remember the increasing and inevitable methane release being much more potent than CO2 (short term x200 and x1000 say if talking in weeks) … means basically we are snookered.

Into the mix and I haven’t actually read this stated as such at least cannot recall anyone mentioning the fact that as CO2 and methane increase there will / must be a corresponding decline in the CO2 cycle as plankton ie diatoms disappear from the oceans, it is only recently that scientists are admitting its probable that diatoms are responsible for half the worlds breathable oxygen. A tragic irony as 70% of the worlds oil and gas is derived from ancient diatom deposits.

Diatoms gone = marine food chain inoperable.

Diatoms gone = every other breath of oxygen no longer available.


Chemtrail data hidden from public view, south of England, northern Europe. 15th Feb ’23 … https://go.nasa.gov/3YVUX5K

Postscript re climate change.

There will no doubt be massive fires, huge loss of oxygenating plant life and I hate to say it as I wish no-one any harm a rise in tectonic activity / re-adjustment of plates. Again …. snookered! One could say that whoever devised this bundle of skin and bone to functioning systems will probably now be disgusted at where we have arrived. The human race and Organised Capital demands progress which as in the standard Western Model is now a complete system of achieving so called ‘success’ but how else can it be, there is an obsession (with organised capital) of innovation, growth, market share. Often I feel the unethical grab of obscene profit margin or mark-up can never be justified, to my mind there should be a regulatory guidance to permissable profit margin, likewise my detestation of ‘ornery folk turning themselves into IR35 Ltd Co’s and opting out of paying fair taxes is detestable, a swinging cop-out, but thats another subject. I’m unsure of the figures but we’ve walked upright since five or seven million years ago and its only three hundred years of a modern activity for us to upset the chemistry set and physical interactions of this world to turn itself against us. I don’t normally write in this manner but the realisation of the very simple cross-over CO2 / CH4 and O graph that seems not to be alluded to elsewhere really does set us in a far more dire position than most folk realise. What makes me particularly sad is so much beauty in the natural world, both macro and microscopic will I assume be lost.

Q. How quickly will terrestrial plant life react to a fast diminishing oxygen count?

Q. How quickly will planktonic life and particularly diatoms disappear, I reckon weeks once a tipping point is crossed, they are sensitive ‘niche’ organisms. Look at the now collapsed symbiotic relationship of algae and bryozoans that were at one time coral reef. This is a screaming alarm bell more profound than anyone is admitting.

Q. How many times this year and next will we see the horror of the recent Turkey/ Syria earthquakes repeated?

Q. It will only take one harvest to be ruined by changing weather patterns for the world to be thrown in turmoil, the USA burger obsession will come to an abrupt halt. And probably I assume Chinas pork production.

Q. Not really a question, a simple fact that ice melting rates are woefully under-reported or underestimated, we all know as kids how ice can flash off overnight and next morning as we look out the window and all is gone.

I remind people to visualise the crossover graph of increasing methane and diminishing oxygen, a double whammy so to speak or a logarithmic and catastrophic change in the breathable atmosphere.

These are only my personal views, pls fact check.

copyright climate-change-briefing.com 2023

Quick random search .. very interesting re Pacific cloud formation and importance. https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-108/acp-2022-108.pdf

climate change misinformation, time drag ….

This morning at 0900 bbc r4 with Andrew Marr was a profoundly mixed experience, lots of hubris and earnest ‘educated’ pontification, well meaning tones but fell down badly, completely missing the point in many ways. Interesting say re Durer, his life and time, his nature observations and artwork, all basic stuff many I hope would know already, but where it fell flat and this is where it looks like Andrew Marr knows little and hasn’t done much reading if any on this is when we stepped into climate change topics; remember, the remit of bbc radio is to inform and educate.

The two big clangers from just tuning in to the latter portion of the programme were a few minutes on coral reef decline that utterly utterly avoided mentioning the algal/ bryozoan symbiosis that is 100% vital to their continuing existence with no distinct reason given apart from warming; a nonsense skirting and skimming as to why this unique portion of the living world is fast disappearing. Think – algae – diatom- invisible to the naked eye. Another elementary and sad to say basic error was never to mention the absolute importance of anything microscopic, the foundation of all marine life and hence ocean weather systems ie the climate of this planet, us, everything. Yes, theres lots of so-called educated folk on bbc r4 in fact at times it seems to be a necessity for anyone appearing on the programming output and goodness knows an absolute necessity to be employed behind the scenes by the bbc; but I’m sure there will be many clever fifteen year olds with a microscope that have greater insight than this. Too little, too late.

The other quite bizarre takeaway from this bbc r4 Andrew Marr programme at 0900 this morning was at the end a minute or two on ‘whitening of the skies’ to tie in with a book plug and attendant pontificator on such matters !! .. ha ha ha … Andrew, please read this blog numskull. Its already going on, contrary to the impression given that this is all ‘future stuff’ its already under way and has been for years. My own efforts here re chemtrail sky alteration are much diminished because it seems the UKs most prolific chemtrail recorder (me) its now made sure little gets sprayed in the skies observable above this location, thank goodness as theres lots of other things I would rather do with my life. I know where we are going and theres nothing I can do to stop it, a view held widely among scientists. Thousands of pics, a developed reporting system and NASA worldview and flightradar24 tie-in with many hours blogging / recording and all are sufficient to prove to my own mind what is going on. Its pointless to try and engage anyone in this topic of conversation, their minds are incapable, untutored and totally ignorant of what is starkly obvious; popular media too has done a good job at ridiculing folk like me. An exception to the nowadays (previous say four or five months) of clear un-meddled skies here in the north east of England was last Friday 26th Feb 2021, difficult to detect on NASA Worldview, but I’ve lots lots to photograph up in the sky, mainly south and west of here, it was a massive chemtrail afternoon. Lots, parallel lines, cross-overs, chemtrails galore remaining suspended for hours.

pics to follow…

Loop di loop … chemtrail evidence.

Chemtrails New Mexico, Arizona, Texas.

The chemtrail evidence is that the trail deposited remains in the sky, just as we witness from the ground. I see occasional loops here too, 6k miles away in NE England. But NASA Worldview is merely a snapshot of time and misses most of what is happening.

Note the shadow cast onto the land, theres many more chemtrail tracks if you cast a wider net; the area ‘loop di loop’ covered looks to be fifty miles by eighty miles.

Its a huge swathe of chemtrail (assuming my photo-interpretation skills are correct) and significantly / fundamentally alters the sunlight levels and climate across southern USA on this particular day Friday 6th Dec 2019.

My arguament to chemtrail deniers is the PERSISTENCE of these chemtrail tracks in the first screen capture below, at   LEAST FOUR TO FIVE HUNDRED MILES OF SINGLE TRACK CHEMTRAIL that does not WEAKEN OR DIMINISH EVEN AFTER MORE THAN AN HOURS FLYING TIME. And casts a very visible shadow on the land. The proof is 99% … this cannot be condensation.

As beautifully stated by a youtuber on an embed from my previous post …. “Its not perfume they are spraying”.

Its my opinion that the CA wildfires were much exacerbated by nano-particle aluminium from years of chemtrails, likewise extraordinarilly high levels of childhood autism and the death / loss of marine and freshwater primary level bio-diverstity ie plankton, algae, diatoms and hence zooplankton, all of which is indispensable to all marine life no matter how big the eventual food chain grazer, much of it ie diatoms are only visible with a microscope. The irony of the latter is devastating, seventy percent of the worlds oil and gas originates from ancient diatom deposits, no-one has ever seen an individual diatom with the naked eye, however the oil and hence gas which generally settled into underground strata from diatoms and the burning of which has lead to our present predicament ie global warming and mass extinction. It would be hard to make this up. I also think it is the loss of diatoms from the bryozoan-diatom symbiosis which has lead to the loss of coral reef.  This latter point is very hard to find in sufficient detail on the web, as we are increasingly realising the time taken for observations to completed peer review is is far too long, we no longer can afford the previous delay.

I need to be enlightened on this and many points, my newer Windows 10 and Bing search results are paltry compared to my old methods ie Windows XP my old setup.


loop di loop chemtrail geoengineering Friday 6th Dec 2019 central USA. El Paso, Lubbock, Odessa, Amarillo. https://go.nasa.gov/2DWLpzY
Fifty mile by eighty mile loop di loop chemtrail geoengineering Friday 6th Dec 2019 central USA. El Paso, Lubbock, Odessa, Amarillo. https://go.nasa.gov/2DWLpzY

Arizona, New Mexico, Texas chemtrails Friday 6th Dec 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2Yngzd8
Arizona, New Mexico, Texas chemtrails Friday 6th Dec 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2Yngzd8

Note chemtrail geoengineering looks to extend across Arizona, New Mexico and Texas in the above NASA Worldview screen capture. However realise I am merely a self-taught hobbyist, not a pro Meteorologist. The latter of course have signed the Official Secrets Act or whatever is the USA equivalent and therefore of course cannot offer any comment whatsoever.

Another example same day, chemtrails Bakerfield, Santa Barbara, Santa Clarita link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2Ys1qac

Mexicali, Phoenix Dec 2 2019 link only … https://go.nasa.gov/33ZMD86

Close up of the above ie one hundred mile screen width ie chemtrail Dec 2 2019 Gulf of California, Mexicali, Phoenix, link only … https://go.nasa.gov/2Pkci60

Look also up at Seattle, a frequent target for chemtrail.

As is my habit lets go look for youtubes.


Coral reef without diatoms?

Diatoms are a keen interest of mine and heres a e360yale article that as with all others never seems to involve or stress the importance of diatoms in the symbiotic relationship /actual existance of coral reef.

I might be wrong, I’m only an interested layman with a few hundred hours of hobby microscope time ie freshwater algae but it vexes me when this vital aspect is basically ignored. The answer is already there ie temperature rise.

Show any child an image or view of diatoms and they will be fascinated, its hard to be otherwise.



postscript … at our mostly okay Secondary School north UK circa 1969-74  maybe only  once did the microscopes come come out of their dark cupboard; the teacher himself must have never realised life at microscopic level, algae etc its wonders and beauty. Or maybe just too lazy, probably the latter. He was too interested in his beloved youth club, forms and paperwork that should not have displaced his teaching effort. I have literally sat through complete lessons playing ‘hangman’ (many times in fact) a kids pen and paper time filler whilst the pillock was busy on admin he should have done elsewhere. A lot of hangman….

I mention this because a couple of days ago a bbc radio news reporter was ‘alarmed’ to interview a cash strapped African teacher of biology and he admitted they did not have a microscope to help reveal a great number of otherwise hidden detail. Alarm! How upsetting, how tragic. How bullshit! No such facility was offered to us up in our village Secondary School in England. And anyway, a textbook is all you need to get through any O level or as we did a simpler thing called CSE.

Likewise here locally a more industrial area a couple of years ago publicity was made re a group of students from China (say fifteen year olds?) and that old standby photographic prop the microscope was featured, it was obvious this was a prop, merely to give ‘an impression’ of a more involved level of competence and enquiry. Again. B/S raises its ugly head….