Grabbing hold of some ….

… chemtrail pics. Heres just a quick look around at what seems credible material, I avoid the whackier pages.

 

Interesting chemtrail pic over London:- https://jaydensdailydaylondon.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/chemtrails-over-south-east-london-uk/

 

Also,

 

 

Here below is artist Chris Holden, a creditable piece of work, I couldn’t agree more.

Look up,Not Down – Chemtrails. (Acrylic paint on canvas)

Look up, not down. Artwork by Chris Holden re chemtrail ignorance.
Look up, not down. Artwork by Chris Holden re chemtrail ignorance.

 

 

 

Let me add a couple of my own photographs, I’ve a six month archive that has yet to be posted of chemtrails here in NE England, whittled down to sixty; four pics from end of June 2019.

 

UK chemtrail, NE England 22 June 2019 07:17 hrs
UK chemtrail, NE England 22 June 2019 07:17 hrs
UK chemtrail, NE England 22 June 2019 18:38 hrs
UK chemtrail, NE England 22 June 2019 18:38 hrs. Note the older chemtrail has hazed to an ‘aluminized sky’. 

I’ve also devised my own DQA reporting system, a quick search finds it on this blog, a blog at present running to approx. four hundred posts.

UK chemtrail, NE England 23 June 2019 12:27 hrs
UK chemtrail, NE England 23 June 2019 12:27 hrs, this is not a natural sky whatsoever, note a aluminized haze and the two big chemtrails. 
UK chemtrail, NE England 23 June 2019 12:27 hrs
UK chemtrail, NE England 23 June 2019 12:27 hrs

 

Below is one that is probably already online, posted half a year ago.

UK chemtrail, NE England June 2019
UK chemtrail, NE England June 2019
UK chemtrail, NE England June 2019
UK chemtrail, NE England June 2019

 

 

Microplastics and ocean health.

Two quick n easy films, thought provoking and incorporating two of my favourite interests, diatoms and the microscope.

One salient point drawn from each film:

  • Our salt contains microplastics (remember the blood / brain barrier) that only become visible when examined with a quite simple bench microscope.
  • Every fifth breath we make is supplied by the function of diatoms.

Diatoms appear to be now severely compromised, in my simple google searches its near impossible to obtain up to date information. I’ve read several times that diatom CO2 to O conversion is equivilant to the value of the rain forests for the same task. ie 20% contribution to world CO2 to O.

 

 

Most of the microscope footage is pretty well as you would see it at home with a medium price bench microscope. A spend of say £100-200 for a secondhand ‘scope would do all you want. I use a binocular Biolam obtained from a microscopical society here in the UK thirty years ago and was available as the original user had failing eyesight and had to go into care. I seldom use anything other than low mag for algal samples, diatoms etc say x100, of the four powers available I only use the lower two. Theres no need to buy new.

Note also that diatoms produce a gas DMS that was only in the 1970’s detected by independent scientist James Lovelock as is very important for oceanic weather systems.

 

The other big question I need to find out about is present contamination from nano-particle aluminium, as in the embedded youtube of around three posts ago ‘Lines in the Sky’ professional (retired) fisheries biologist Frances Mangels tells us that nano-particle aluminium is a billionth of a metre ie one thousandth smaller than particles of tobacco smoke. If my reading of this and my arithmetic is sound, we can write this as :-

tobacco particle = 1m x 10 power minus 6 (written 10^-6) ie take off three 0’s for a metre to millimetre conversion which gives 0.001mm ie one thousandth of a millimetre.

nano-particle aluminium = 1m x 10 power minus 9 (1m x 10^-9) will be one thousandth of the above ie 0.000001mm which in my opinion is way beyond what can be detected with an ordinary light microscope.

hint : remember 10^-2 mm is one hundredth ie 0.01mm  therefore 10^-3 is one thousandth ie 0.001mm

In my opinion its always much easier to talk as dec fraction of a millimetre (mm) when dimensions are sub-millimetre. As a practical engineer this is ALWAYS how it would be handled, far less room for error.

Realise that nano-particle aluminium is a far far smaller an aluminium particle that could ever occur in nature and therefore poses threats we would never have dreamed of.

As I write this piece we have an aluminised sky above, a strange grey, yesterday Sat 28 Dec 2019 was a lot of chemtrail over Europe as found on NASA Worldview and when out this morning 0930 yet again there are chemtrails being laid at high alt. Do many register this, anyone question it ???

Disclaimer; please note I am only an interested layman and please fact check whatever views and ideas I write of.

 

DMS: The Climate Gas You’ve Never Heard Of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phytoplankton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_the_plankton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algae

 

Chemtrails geoengineering Milwaukee.

As the man says in the first youtube below “They are painting the skies.”

We get less of them here (NE England) because I think my steady ongoing and active chemtrail blogging scares ’em off, I reckon the chemtrail polluters avoid my ‘cone of view’.

So anyway, at random I slide my NASA Worldview search over to The Great Lakes area and sure enough Traverse City, Michigan, Milwaukee, Grand Rapids, Chicago, Detroit …  get an eye full of chemtrail geoengineering today. First the NASA Worldview screen capture then as is my custom youtubes of chemtrail for that area.

Base Layer/Corrected Reflectance is middle choice of three ie aqua/Modis.

Chicago, Grand Rapids, Milwaukee, chemtrails geoengineering Thursday 6th Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2s3nCeE
Chicago, Grand Rapids, Milwaukee, chemtrails geoengineering Thursday 6th Dec 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2s3nCeE

Note in the above 90% is chemtrail.

Today theres many locations worldwide to catch a glimpse of chemtrail geoengineering for instance chemtrail USA can be seen at … https://go.nasa.gov/2LtBm9x  and  https://go.nasa.gov/2LmTB0r  and San Francisco and LA … https://go.nasa.gov/2LrVxVA

 

 

As the man from Flint says “They’re not spraying vitamins” !!!

 

 

facebook chemtrails and an about face…

I should really search chemtrail facebook more often, near zilch to present yet heres much to confirm chemtrails are real and something to question and certainly take note of.

I’m not fighting anyone, nor creating a ‘war’ with any government, merely hoping to bring some sensible awareness that indeed chemtrails are real by bundling together my observations and useful material to strengthen my position.

In the material below we can see older (same day) hazed and aluminized sky, medium term broadening chemtrail into bands of haze and new ‘as being laid’ chemtrail.  I’ve photographed chemtrail here in NE England at night in the dark an hour or more before first light of day, which in that particular morning was so blatant I think would never have been perpetrated in daylight (pics pending).

https://www.facebook.com/Amsterdam-Chemtrails-

 

Scouting around we find many pages or sites that fizzle out over time. I also note how few visitors or followers this material actually gathers considering how ‘big’ or apparent in the sky above the problem actually is.

Rosalind Peterson appears and I know from prior knowledge was a peculiar case of a lifetime chemtrail acknowledgement and activism and latterly a complete about-turn and denial before she passed away in Feb 2018, assuming I’ve got my facts correct of course.

Heres bits and pieces to build a picture ….

Welcome to California Skywatch

 

 

Then the bombshell from Rosalind Peterson in later life, a complete ‘about-turn’, also I’ve pasted some transcript from this specific youtube page beneath the vid below. I wish no disrespect here, merely bringing in material to form a fuller more informed discussion.

I quote …

Rosalind Peterson, founder of California Skywatch, says there’s no evidence that those trails in the sky are anything other than normal contrails, aircraft emissions. Transcript of that portion:

“We have to stick with what we can prove. We have to stay away from opinions and beliefs. And if we go to sue someone, we have to have enough rock solid evidence that is so tight to make a case so that we don’t lose the case, and that we have many many people, in other words experts in various fields, to testify on our behalf. This mean university professors, this means people that can come and back up our statements, back up the studies, where we can prove that the jets for example reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the earth, they change the climate.
And so what happens is, that when I see though, that we are talking about suing, … who? In other words, I find that the direct proof to link up who’s doing what …, and also I can tell you that in ten years of research, other than aluminum coated fiberglass, chaff releases by the US Military, I have no proof whatsoever that the jets are releasing anything but jet fuel emissions.
Now I can prove that the rocket programs in the United States are releasing trimethylaluminum, aluminum oxide, barium. I can prove the rocket programs in the United States are just coating us with toxic chemicals all the time. And these programs are listed at NASA, NOAA, the US Air Force, the US Navy, I mean there’s tests going on all the time. The US Navy CARE program is a prime example. So I can prove, I have so many documents I couldn’t even put them all on the internet, even if I tried, because there’s Pentagon reports, there’s all kind of reports dating back twenty, thirty years.
When it comes to proving what the jets are releasing, I don’t have the documentation, and I don’t have a single study, I don’t have a single solitary verifiable evidence that the jets are releasing anything except military releases of aluminum coated fiberglass by military aircraft.
So there’s a differentiation for me in putting my name or associating myself with something where I can’t back it up. Now if anyone has direct proof, they’ve got university studies, if you’ve got documents, government documents, if you’ve got reports, then that makes a big difference. But right now, after ten years of research, I can’t do it.”

end of quote.

All she’ll talk about is probably what is known as ‘chaff’ ie something to confuse enemy radar, a v old technique.

Disclaimer, you have to realise material online may not quite be what it purports to be, there are bound to some ppl that delight in twisting and turning the facts to suit their own viewpoint, to possibly hijack a subject and in effect attempt to misinform and damage the facts as best presented. Therefore of course, read diligently, be sure to get at the intention of the text or material; wolves in sheeps clothing etc.

Currently USA scientists and environmental experts are held in the cleft stick of shut-up or lose your funding.

 

 

 

Can I find chemtrails ?

Yes I can, lots of them. A few weeks ago here north east England an hour before sunrise looking up it was like a Regency wallpaper at all the BIG parallel lines in the sky. This would never have been done in daylight, it really would have been too obvious. And so as with yesterday Thursday 3rd October 2019 the morning chemtrail geoengineering was a subtle yet persistent affair but by mid morning was painfully obvious ramped up to a chemtrail free-for-all in that both obvious chemtrail lines in the sky and the randomness of compass heading / directions utilised was quite insulting and yet NO-ONE seems to be savvy enough to look up and wonder what is happening. Most folk know little or nothing about such things, ie no observational experience yet quite openly and immediately will refute the phenomena known as ‘chemtrails’. General media has indeed done a good job at ridiculing such things, remember that anything chemtrail is always bundled up with nonsense and a term I detest … ‘conspiracy theories’.

Most certainly the weathermen / meteorologists must be tied and bound with the Official Secrets Act.

What I need is accurate and archived weather sat images more detailed than the obscure fuzzy offerings of   http://www.sat24.com/gb  which is near to useless for my purposes.

Maybe I need this … https://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/articles/goes-s-next-generation-high-definition-weather-satellite-set-to-launch-forecasting-into-the-future/96497/

To recap, Thursday 3rd Oct 2019 saw obvious chemtrail activity here in NE England.

As the NASA Worldview sat image collected yesterday afternoon demonstrates as witnessed, there indeed was a visible edge to the grey blanket of morphed chemtrail aluminium visible as shown say twenty thirty miles out into the North Sea.

Europe and the UK suspected chemtrail Thursday 3 Oct 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2Ol8QJs
Europe and the UK suspected chemtrail Thursday 3 Oct 2019 https://go.nasa.gov/2Ol8QJs

In my opinion and so far developed ‘eye’ to these things the outer right hand curving rim of the above weather system provides an excellent means of laying down chemtrail but what doesn’t follow through is how so much above yesterday was in random directions and also three big arcs of wide-hazing chemtrail. By lunchtime the sky had modified to a grey fug; therefore I would tend to say the above sat image is certainly data from after twelve noon.

Paris, Rheims, Luxembourg, chemtrail geoengineering 3 Oct 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2AGhWIO
Paris, Rheims, Luxembourg, chemtrail geoengineering 3 Oct 2019. https://go.nasa.gov/2AGhWIO

In the above there is both visible recent chemtrail lines in the sky which are quite obvious and previous ie two or three hour resultant grey chemtrail fug / chemtrail aluminised haze. The links are clickable, the only drawback is that there is a limit to magnifiable definition.

Latest points to note of chemtrail activity 2019 are broken / intermittent chemtrail spraying and pre-dawn chemtrails.

As is my habit, lets look for chemtrail youtubes for Paris, Reims, Luxembourg.

Greenland ice melt.

I keep it brief, we know fine well what is to happen;  I haven’t the patience nor attention span for a fifteen minute ‘presentation’ or anyone droning on with minutae so to speak.

Its obvious already we are into extreme weather events both in ferocity and frequency,   likewise ice melt is heading in a most awful direction, note undersea ice volume as unseen from sat images will soon in a year or two at most surprise us all. Most arctic ice quite horribly is 0.5 metres or less.

Chemtrails are getting clever too, Tuesday morning last before any visible light from the Sun I could see huge definite parallel trails across the sky, I photographed them too with tripod and timer. Also this morning weather sat revealed huge amount of chemtrails NW of Ireland in the North Atlantic heading towards Ireland and Europe. Remember this most likely I am assuming contains aluminium, barium, strontium, etc in nano-particle form.

Therefore I am mindful to ‘keep it simple’ to live a righteous considerate life, gain pleasure where I can, to help whoever I may and am so sorry we are at such ‘interesting times’.

The real big triggers are ice loss, disappearing permafrost and the dreaded arctic methane (say x120 the nastiness of CO2 in the first five years) which are land based and beneath shallow water ie under 50m water depth of the East Siberian Iceshelf, as illustrated on any map of the north polar region.

For Arctic ice google Prof Peter Wadhams. http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/pw11/

Look also how near un-reported is the loss of diatoms a particular interest of mine, these being the actual originators of 70% of the worlds oil and gas reserves, no-one has ever seen a single diatom with the naked eye yet to my untrained amateur mind the loss of diatoms is directly linked to massive widespread pacific seabird collapse, coral decline and the probable loss of ocean cloud systems and associated generation of DMS and the conversion of or generation of 20% of the worlds oxygen. By diatoms we can also include other marine / water based algae. Plankton is the next level of food chain above algae, both much neglected as a news item for the general public.

We all know as kids how ice melts, we wake up and next morning its all gone.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/07/greenland-melting-second-time-this-summer-bad/

https://nsidc.org/greenland-today/

 

 

Lines in the sky.

UK chemtrail diary Fri 13th Sept 2019.

Loads of crappy lines in the sky this morning, would have to be blind or stupid or both not to notice, but hey presto …. few take notice.

NASA Worldview luckily displayed lots of lines in the sky ie chemtrails yesterday at 14:40 basically as soon as the data was available for southern England, however six hours later the criss-cross lines in the sky as revealed by NASA Worldview for southern England had disappeared.  Luckily I took a screen shot of the chemtrails at first viewing ie 14:40 hrs.

Six hours later this chemtrail pic was replaced at NASA Worldview to one with far less number of chemtrails. England chemtrails Fri 13th 2019 1440 hrs
Six hours later this chemtrail pic was replaced at NASA Worldview to one with far less number of chemtrails. England chemtrails Fri 13th 2019 1440 hrs

 

Here below is what we find a day later when we view retrospectively chemtrail / lines in the sky for southern England Fri 13th Sept 2019 ie my chemtrail diary.

second version of southern England chemtrails published by NASA for 13th Sept 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/31ktrBi
second version ie altered to eliminate chemtrails of southern England lines in the sky as published by NASA for 13th Sept 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/31ktrBi

On the above elimination of the lines in the sky for southern England ie chemtrail data  note slight difference in area encompassed by the screenshot.

Same day further in northern England as was most certainly obvious early and mid morning we see an obvious ‘corridor’ of chemtrail material. Chemtrails in corridor fashion is one technique as is ‘on and off’ chemtrail spraying when making a more random / any direction chemtrail performance. Another trick often used in North America chemtrail spraying is to tag onto the outer limits of a cloud system as posted here a few days ago; link pending.

Below, is heavy chemtrail action across the Irish Sea, Anglesey, Lancashire and onto the North East as captured and still remaining accessible for Fri 13th 2019.

Irish Sea chemtrails, Anglesey, Lancashire, North East England Fri 13th Sept 2019 ... https://go.nasa.gov/2ZYt81B
Irish Sea chemtrails, Anglesey, Lancashire, North East England Fri 13th Sept 2019 … https://go.nasa.gov/2ZYt81B

Note I am always keen to use the particular name of the day, to try and see some rythmn to the weekly routine of chemtrails.

Heres another for that Friday, Hudson bay ie https://go.nasa.gov/31kuEsk

As is my habit lets go look for some youtubes to accompany these locations …

As the first embed narrator tells us “Its the big elephant in the room nobody is talking about”.