Tag: climate change links

Watch the ice …

Succinct and direct vid and also illustrates the flow outwards of ice into the North Atlantic. I wld have liked more written text but I assume format precludes, its an intentional brief hit of info.

Note also that its thickness that matters, from above we can still see some of the whiter older ice but at what thickness? Likewise Grenland, likewise everywhere. Here 7th Dec NE England its far too warm this morning, car thermometer tells me 10deg C.

https://nowthisnews.com/videos/future/nasa-animation-shows-arctic-ice-rapidly-depleting

Mass extinction … trying to understand.

https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/6th-mass-extinction-under-way-may-put-humans-at-6338783.php

Look at the contributors, for instance … Paul Erlich.

Not many bees this last year, no hubble of flies as I walk along late summer country lanes. The little critturs go first …. go ask a diatom.

Then the birds will fail and as above the pollinators and meanwhile some twat at 5G tells us how lucky we are ….

I am so glad I do not live in a city.

 

That bloody term ‘bleaching’ …

You mean the Bryozoans have given up, expired.

This falsity and laxness vexes me. And what of their symbiotic relationship with from what i have read … diatoms ?

ie …

https://www.carbonbrief.org/carbon-brief-interview-prof-terry-hughes

So maybe we can say that the Bryozoans are the aquatic canary in the coal mine?

 

copyright climate-change-briefing.com 2018

climate change links …

My hope is that anyone stumbling upon this blog of mine will realise its my intention readers click back to older posts to find an unfolding list of useful material and associated serious and valuable websites, I generally only post repeated sources such as news sites hoping otherwise ppl will realise to ‘drill down’ to get the good stuff.

So here I am contradicting myself and posting material that I cannot allow to drift away unread …

https://e360.yale.edu/features/escalator-to-extinction-can-mountain-species-adapt-to-climate-change

Heres an overview of their latest material … https://e360.yale.edu/digest

Thats lots to be reading and a little of something else just found re Arctic warming  …  https://wordpress.com/read/feeds/12481054/posts/2079388346     …. theres some good embeds from Prof Peter Wadhams, I have his book here ‘A Farewell to Ice’.

It is sad beyond words that most of us in the West are now able to lead a pleasant moderately civilised and comfortable life and to see it all taken away by Natures intolerance of human activity. Perhaps that displays how I regard my position in the social or class structure of this country, that I assume automatically that my forbears led lives of hard work, long hours and the niggling fear of what might be around the corner, what might happen next. But maybe I am running to false conclusions, perhaps they were able to gain some happiness or satisfaction contrary to their aching limbs, subservience to an employer and multiple deaths at every stage of life from childbirth onwards?  My arguament would be that it is only in the last few decades where emancipation, workers rights, better housing, personal mobility, education and better conditions at work and access to healthcare have appeared on the scene. Yes, it is only recently we are better off speaking as a working class person.

Scouting for climate info …

trump and his nastiness diverts us from pursuing a more usual constructive life and chemtrails I reckon are probably to be absent until spring and the warming of the sun, at least here in the UK. So now at backend 2018 we can look at climate change info ….

look at micro-granules of plastic and the blood/ brain barrier … https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/apr/24/record-levels-of-plastic-discovered-in-arctic-sea-ice

countries acting now … https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/oct/24/some-of-the-countries-leading-on-climate-change-might-surprise-you

sixty percent gone  … https://www.theguardian.com/environment/video/2018/oct/30/wwf-report-warns-annihilation-of-wildlife-threatens-civilisation-video

ditto … https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/oct/27/world-on-track-to-lose-two-thirds-of-wild-animals-by-2020-major-report-warns

It would take a full page A4 of close-typed headings to even bring together the basics of enquiry / search terms for the layman.

mainstream denial of Pacific die-off … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDno5_ARLbY

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Watson

From experience I know that successive days or sessions on youtube yield better, more detailed or less populist material on any form of search, this was obvious about eight years ago one Christmas where I focused on Italian Neo-Realist cinema of the 1950’s. It took three evenings before I was offered the full-length ‘Umberto D’.

Heres some hints to look out for and many are covered/ linked here in previous posts …

  • bee and insect decline
  • arctic ice loss
  • antarctic melting from beneath
  • increasing sliding speed of glaciers
  • diatom and plankton loss and the importance of this
  • dead rivers
  • loss of caddis fly
  • fish stock decline (everywhere)
  • alzheimers in bees
  • west coast USA river entire ecosystem decline
  • Pacific seabird collapse (starvation) and its under-reporting
  • Fukushima
  • aluminium from chemtrails
  • California wildfires and chemtrail aluminium accumulation
  • autism increase (aluminium)
  • deforestation
  • needing to decrease beef consumption
  • population growth
  • too great a dependance on digital and the web and how we think
  • web manipulation, manipulating opinion
  • trumps madness and denial, the EPA tragedy
  • trumps lies and graduated decline into authoritarianism, American Fascism
  • the inadequecy of the IPCC reporting
  • methane in its three forms, frozen hydrate, microbial, geological (ice capped)
  • green plant transpiration reversal at increased CO2
  • the love affair with the SUV and carbon based personal transport
  • human arrogance and conceit
  • electric vehicles not being the answer they seem
  • chemtrail deployment, resultant ‘haze’ and impact on organic growers
  • Monsanto patents and aluminium resistance
  • jet stream alteration and split resulting in warm wet air over the Arctic
  • etc etc

 

 

New angles on chemtrails …

Subject: doubled-up chemtrails in one ‘track’ and aluminized skies.

We are near coastal here, lately hard to see five miles up to the chemtrail deposition layer as coastal ‘fret’ precludes. From a higher vantage point later in the day Sunday last ie 14th October 2018 revealed sporadic chem trail and specifically trails along the Pennines to the west of here ie the backbone of England. I also noticed an aircraft depositing very close to an existing track. Monday the same trick was revealed, I literally watched as another plane flew right in among an existing trail. The resulting trail was ‘solid’ in appearance and in parts separated slightly to display its two plane components. It hung around for hours, extremely bright across the sky, without even dispersing into the usual chemtrail haze. I assume overnight it morphed itself into haze.

Remember, conventional media ie tv does its best to bundle anything ‘chemtrail’ with nonsense theories, so if you are likely to mention this to anyone its usual you are ridiculed. All I do is observe, I’ve been trained to see and to think in many areas of activity, I do not run to conclusions or any ‘theories’.

All pics in the first photo group are from Sun to Tuesday 16th October 2018, not Sept as mistakenly captioned, time is short here and it will have to serve as is for now.

 

 

I think this is an Aluminized sky (from chemtrails?) 15th October 2018 teatime.
Sunset, 14th Sept 2018 UK chemtrails, now starting to see closer to ‘doubled up’ chemtrails which appeared the day following; north east UK.
A half hour later after sunset, 14th Sept 2018 UK chemtrails, now starting to see closer to ‘doubled up’ chemtrails which appeared the day following; north east UK. Several are too low on the horizon say 40-60 miles away for the camera to show at this low zoom.
A brief gap in the lower layer allowing me to observe chemtrails in the higher sky …
Monday 15th Sept 2018, here is my first observed real doubled-up chemtrail here in the UK. I photographed the second plane as it flew along the existing trail. It hung around without hazing for hours.
Parallel chemtrails of which we’ve seen more lately, an hour before the real doubled-up trail at teatime. Mon 15th Sept 2018. I can see five trails in that pic.
Heres the real nasty one, the doubled up trail, a phenomena new to my observations. It seemed not to want to disperse ie not to haze and persisted for hours. Mon 15th Sept 2018 north east UK.
At sunset near to two hours later of the doubled up chemtrail. Heres the real nasty one, the doubled up trail, a phenomena new to my observations. It seemed not to want to disperse ie not to haze and persisted for hours. Mon 15th Sept 2018 north east UK.
What to my eyes is an aluminized sky, I’m surmising the result of chemtrail deposits. Tues 16th Sept 2018.North east UK.

 

…. three horizontal pics second line down are after sunset Sunday 14th October 2018 my first observance of anything approaching a doubled-up; remainder are Monday teatime and illustrate the obscene ‘solid mass’ of doubled up chemtrail deposition that all evening did not appear to break up or haze ie LH second from bottom; I think I’ve been witnessing an experiment. The ‘grey/ aluminized’ sky is Tuesday 16th October 2018 4pm (all are October) as I have stupidly mis-labelled them, how do i correct? Time is short here for this faffing-on! Nothing is photo-shopped or modified in any way, I’m not that sort of photographer.

  • Sunday night some parallel chemtrails but wide-spaced.
  • Monday teatime some close to doubled but gap noticeable, then its the biggie, a dense doubled up that does not haze or disperse, shining incredibly bright.
  • Tuesday what looks to be a heavily aluminized sky, teatime.

 

As I add to this its now Wednesday evening, its been a consistent chemtrail activity all day, though at first this morning any activity was masked by lower cloud.  Quite obscene. For anyone to NOT take notice absolutely beggars belief. With the IPCC Report of a week ago I glanced online that geo-engineering (ie chemtrail weather modification) is indeed promoted. Therefore the ridicule I’ve sustained and a valuable friendship much soured will soon be vindicated, as I predicted I will most certainly be proven right on this matter.

 

 

Note L.H. second row from bottom, how low wind flow has dragged haze from the chemtrail, needs careful attention to see this in the pic, is feint. All above are today Wed 17th Oct 2018. Hint – click on a pic to get more details ie time and date, I’ve not bothered with captions. Also note to the left of bottom pic, a strictly defined wide band of haze dispersed from one chemtrail. Steady skies yesterday, low wind speed at high alt; this is why on a bad chemtrail morning ie chemtrails say 6 till 8am then the constant morphing and turmoil say by 9am the movement and turmoil is staggering and surely can only suggest these are not natural skies and must be taken notice of.

Frequently throughout springtime we had needless chemtrails here in north east UK, all growing plants were hindered. Curiously for a fortnight in the run up to the Royal Wedding it was a reprieve with continuous bright blue skies. Chemtrails are often / even thrown at us when its a bright blue high pressure morning, this contradicts what is natural.

To recap briefly the aluminium, barium and strontium it is thought / wondered has ….

  • created massive childhood autism on west coast USA.
  • created an aluminized landscape that burns ferociously as wildfires, witness autumn 2017 California wildfires.
  • near eliminated lower food chain ie loss of caddis fly in west USA streams and rivers, no more trout fishing.
  • diatoms essential lower food chain possibly also tied in (burning the 70% oil and gas worlds reserves from these invisible things) has ironically led to their demise. Witness Pacific seabird collapse three years ago, all flew inland, all stomachs empty … grossly under-reported.
  • Alzheimers in bees (and other insects)? Insect populations in general?
  • Organic growers report year after year of disease and much reduced yields, free-borne (not bonded) aluminium lowers a plants disease resistance and Monsanto worldwide patents all feature disease resistance to such free-borne aluminium.

copyright climate-change-briefing.com 2018

 

postscript; what others are saying …

http://allnewspipeline.com/Killing_Us_With_Chemtrails.php

To discuss Global Warming …

This link below provides a lot of topics for discussion, the primary one being the IPCC falls short of providing the full picture of where we are heading with Climate Change; of falling short of what could be likely reality in the years ahead.

http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/

As I’ve always said (at least from Nov 2017 which was for the first time I switched on to Climate Change) …. the IPCC incorporates large scale carbon capture that has yet to be invented in any serious form and ignores the upcoming effect of methane in its three forms ie geological, microbial and thawing hydrates. Lets enumerate the points and note that I do agree with what Sam Carana has to say which I argue is not bias but reason, the evidence and common sense. When trump as yesterday states that the Climate Change Scientists are being ‘political’ he himself is operating at a totally political and morally unsound position. Every sane thinking person on the planet knows this, the canaries are screaming but trump and his twisted and bitter white old men of the GOP insist otherwise !!!

Let me work through to precis Sams points …

  1.  IPCC has moved the baseline (though I’ve yet to read the IPCC document) …  imagine already how much smelting, burning of coal, steam power had added carbon to the atmosphere already by 1850.
  2. IPCC erroneously applies a straight line projection for whatever lies ahead, in reality its a huge tangle of interconnected self and mutually re-inforcing feedback ever increasing feedback loops. What engineers call positive feedback ie an expotential knock-on and is an upward curve, never conforms to a straight line plot.
  3. IPCC ignores spikes, these causing the really nasty shock effects.
  4. IPCC baseline chosen to wallpaper over the worse view from any other historical baseline.
  5. IPCC playing with the stats.
  6. Anomaly as ocean temperature is at surface and land temp figs as air based figures, this Sam Carana tells us can introduce error.
  7. Method and missing data not embracing latest thinking / developments
  8. IPCC omits temp spikes of 2016 that would have as yet again increased the projected figures and are omitted.
  9. WOW … IPCC does not take into account all the real world happening now events ie snow and ice loss, albedo effect, methanes, last ten year carbon effect, aerosol effect, increased water vapour feedback, jet stream alteration, sea level rise and expansion, green plant CO2 conversion fall off, carbon from wildfires, etc etc. Each single point is so very interconnected and all exacerbate each other.  May I add loss of diatoms and plankton that are major CO2 to O converters as well as being part of ocean weather systems, losing coral reef being a symptom of a the more fundamental crash in ocean food chain, the diatoms. Its time now for a fast tracking approach to science, silly bloody clusters of cagouled junior scientists out on the ice shelf / mass is looking a bit twee; a two year peer review is too slow.
  10. IPCC seems stuck in a time bubble, looking at a carbon ‘budget’ approach when in fact carbon is a massive deficit, a carbon bankruptcy, a bankrupt carbon lifestyle that has to be fundamentally altered (which I doubt we can).
  11. Same old song, IPCC is deficient in abolishing fossil fuels.
  12. Tax or fees needed on polluters. Note the worlds obsession with cheap air travel, polluting gas guzzlers, car based lifestyle (of which I too am some way guilty). In my opinion even electric vehicles are suspect and not as green as we’d like to think.

 

Okay, enumerated rant over. As stated previously, I keep things brief here at this new blog of mine. Human nature being what it is, hubris, the desire for status-objects and lifestyle, recreational air travel, a meat diet … all are near insurmountable obstacles.  There would have to be unwavering catastrophe before affluent western populations realise changes must occur and of course global warming and climate change being what it is ie a cumulative self re-inforcing feedback all change would be too late.

There are three embedded vids at the bottom of Sam Caranas blog, lets listen to the first briefer version of Prof Peter Wadhams wise words (a practical Scientist, a lifelong specialist in sea ice) and pretend not to notice the tedious drawn out intro …

  • IPCC non-alarmist, soft pedalling on feedback machanisms.
  • IPCC pays no attention to potential run-away warming.
  • IPCC by not mentioning a major contributor/s its as if it doesn’t exist !
  • More of the same little sticking plasters or feelgood initiatives are no longer any good.
  • Note that even if we stopped all emmisions ie 100% … its already not sufficient to avert us to catastrophe.
  • World expert on sea ice Prof Wadhams tells us that what the IPCC says on sea ice is ‘daft’. Listen to this crap from the IPCC “An ice free summer once every hundred years”  !!!
  • To approximately quote Prof Wadhams “One would have thought that by now the IPCC would be so embarrassed by its out-dated modelling to have withdrawn that type of approach”. “Pretending the situation isn’t the way it is”.
  • Not a single well-known sea-ice researchers name on the author list from the IPCC.

Lets not forget thawing permafrost and the East Siberian iceshelf.

I’ve thought for years that a condensed print onto paper resume of such talkie vids would save time, get the point across quicker. You can name the app after me …..

It vexes me at the increasing and needless number of ever bigger SUVs and even more expensive cars that my neighbours buy; quite needless as we can hardly assume they are involved in ‘light haulage’! I assume they a) feel they need them and b) are drawn into such a value system. I’ve a neighbour that eats nothing but meat and most others that value a meal at its meat content or its closeness to an oversized burger. Others that thrill at their endless air travel, even a weekend break involves the airport or the insanity of a weekend home a thousand miles away. I’m no angel, far from it but strive to somehow do better, to keep things simple, a lighter carbon footprint and have done for years; at least my work is nearby and I’ve no need to venture more than a few miles.

 

Lets look at chemtrails ….

Its 0900 here, northern UK, too overcast and drizzly to see if chemtrails are being created today; though Sat, Sun and Thursdays seem likely days if there is any pattern to it.  Last couple of weeks its been ‘weak’ activity at most, several days with an obscured overcast sky but say one third of the time intermittent occasional trails staying up and hazing, also noted some way after sundown. And some days bright blue with no observable aircraft overhead, which makes the chemtrail days all the more obvious. Note its the drifting and hazing of what should be a clear bright sky that draws my attention, I never proffer conjecture or conclusions other than lets notice whats going on …  ie the creation of an artificial sky in turmoil due to chemtrails.

What drives me on this are those occasional days (say three since Feb) when the quantity of chemtrail is so great that the resultant churn and turmoil needs to be seen to be believed.

Heres a vid that helps shed some light on the chemtrail problem ….

Ward Hunt Ice Shelf.

I’m no genius. I try to include links and hope people revisit the sites over time so as to see whatever is latest. Therefore a link followed from here can update itself and be a regular port of call providing lots of material to mine into. Heres one from the very useful site neven1 that I posted recently and takes us to … a link to material published in 2004 and still certainly is worthwhile reading ie ….. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/wardhunt

I need to try to seek out more of the microbial/ algal activity of the deposits mentioned, but I know fine well such microscopic imagery will hardly exist, so seldom is it shown to the wider public and I don’t know why, are there journalistic filters that are blind or ignorant to this ???  I don’t think David Attenborough has any interest in this either. This baffles and annoys me, yes we can take the sight of a diatom without wretching.

 

diatoms
diatoms anyone can see through a simple microscope.

 

The algal/ protozoan aspect of this fascinates me and looms large in my approach to nature. You can’t see it but it is very important and on a global scale utterly essential for life on this planet. Its a bit like my curiosity for chemtrails, as with algae it is not direct and in your face but it most certainly is important. It must have been mighty difficult or near impossible centuries ago to get people to realise theres important and essential ‘worlds’ all around us that cannot even be seen! I could imagine rustic types tekkin excitedly o de ‘atoms’ theh chessed oot ont fields yisterdeh, lowped ower’t wall, but deyn’t worry, he nos where deh nestin  ….

Heres another updated version first link … https://earthdata.nasa.gov/user-resources/sensing-our-planet/breakup-of-the-ward-hunt-ice-shelf

I can’t help but notice a certain reticence in the second newer article.